Message boards :
Number crunching :
Waiting for Validation
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Astro Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
> Remember that count was out by around 150k to start with. I think it's found > those "missing" WUs. A few hours ago, it looked like it was going very slowly > yet I was getting credit at a phenominal rate. ;) > Yesterday the count hovered around 140K, 143K, 144K, for most the day. so you think that's some "Baseline"(for some reason), and then that would be the theoretical zero? Todays climb by 70K would be some normal fluctuation? I think Paul's closer to the truth, and that the DB is undergoing some kind of internal function, and that the 70K is the inbound returns not being validated. What do you think? anyone? |
Neil Walker Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 288 Credit: 18,101,056 RAC: 0
|
Remember that count was out by around 150k to start with. I think it's found those "missing" WUs. A few hours ago, it looked like it was going very slowly yet I was getting credit at a phenominal rate. ;) Be lucky Neil |
Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 19 Jul 00 Posts: 3898 Credit: 1,158,042 RAC: 0
|
> I agree, the validator IS working, but I have no idea why the number keeps > growing. The most likely reason is what Paul told. I have no other > explanation. Of course, maybe now the new server is spinning on the "garbage" collection spindle ... |
Roks Send message Joined: 20 Dec 02 Posts: 55 Credit: 137,776 RAC: 0
|
I agree, the validator IS working, but I have no idea why the number keeps growing. The most likely reason is what Paul told. I have no other explanation. <img src="http://www.boincstats.com/stats/banner.php?cpid=d2319b8f0ad14565556d0ba45b64e779"> |
Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 19 Jul 00 Posts: 3898 Credit: 1,158,042 RAC: 0
|
In theory, the average number of WU and Results should be the same each day. But, with the connect every "x" being set differently, and people like me that "flush" our results daily, these numbers are not likely to ever be in balance. So, minor fluctuations in results returned add turbulence to the process flow and may add to our troubles. |
Dunc Send message Joined: 3 Jul 02 Posts: 129 Credit: 2,166,460 RAC: 0
|
The validator is still working. This Is a good barometer of what is happening :) Dunc
|
|
Astro Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
another 48k and we're right back to where we started after the migration. Hope this upward trend does not continue. Ready to send 1,275,094 In progress 706,226 Waiting for validation 210,906 |
|
Dave Mickey Send message Joined: 19 Oct 99 Posts: 178 Credit: 11,122,965 RAC: 0
|
Well, what ever it is continues to happen at a good clip. Last hour on the stat pages shows that the Q grew by another 15,000. I think that's much faster growth than what was occuring when the old machine was trying (but not able) to keep up. So either the Q is getting much more input, or having much less validation done, than was happening before the change over. Dave |
|
Antjest Send message Joined: 27 Oct 99 Posts: 27 Credit: 19,796,139 RAC: 0
|
They probably remove WU's on the older server when queue got extremly large and are now inserting them back. |
|
Dave Mickey Send message Joined: 19 Oct 99 Posts: 178 Credit: 11,122,965 RAC: 0
|
Yes, a very clear reversal of fortunes for the Validation Q - it seems to have spent the last 10 or 12 hours adding several thousand results per hour instead of clearing at that rate as it had been since Friday. :( Possible that an early-Sunday a.m. (CA time) cron job backup or some such kicked in and took away resources from the DB or or the validator? hmmm. Dave |
|
Saimek Send message Joined: 25 Jan 00 Posts: 121 Credit: 454,423 RAC: 0
|
Yeah i noticed that today also =) strange... :/ |
|
Astro Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
Yesterday the number stuck around 143K give or take some, then this morning I see Ready to send 1,279,362 In progress 1,713,462 Waiting for validation 199,788 Given that the new server was reducing this number by 6k/hr it should be down to zero (relative to new incoming units). Hope nothings broke. tony |
©2020 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.