Waiting for Validation

Message boards : Number crunching : Waiting for Validation
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

AuthorMessage
Astro
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 79064 - Posted: 13 Feb 2005, 15:40:11 UTC - in response to Message 79059.  

> Remember that count was out by around 150k to start with. I think it's found
> those "missing" WUs. A few hours ago, it looked like it was going very slowly
> yet I was getting credit at a phenominal rate. ;)
>
Yesterday the count hovered around 140K, 143K, 144K, for most the day. so you think that's some "Baseline"(for some reason), and then that would be the theoretical zero? Todays climb by 70K would be some normal fluctuation?

I think Paul's closer to the truth, and that the DB is undergoing some kind of internal function, and that the 70K is the inbound returns not being validated.

What do you think? anyone?
ID: 79064 · Report as offensive
Profile Neil Walker
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 May 99
Posts: 288
Credit: 18,101,056
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 79059 - Posted: 13 Feb 2005, 15:30:25 UTC

Remember that count was out by around 150k to start with. I think it's found those "missing" WUs. A few hours ago, it looked like it was going very slowly yet I was getting credit at a phenominal rate. ;)


Be lucky

Neil



ID: 79059 · Report as offensive
Profile Paul D. Buck
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 00
Posts: 3898
Credit: 1,158,042
RAC: 0
United States
Message 79057 - Posted: 13 Feb 2005, 15:24:25 UTC - in response to Message 79054.  

> I agree, the validator IS working, but I have no idea why the number keeps
> growing. The most likely reason is what Paul told. I have no other
> explanation.

Of course, maybe now the new server is spinning on the "garbage" collection spindle ...

ID: 79057 · Report as offensive
Profile Roks

Send message
Joined: 20 Dec 02
Posts: 55
Credit: 137,776
RAC: 0
Slovenia
Message 79054 - Posted: 13 Feb 2005, 15:15:43 UTC

I agree, the validator IS working, but I have no idea why the number keeps growing. The most likely reason is what Paul told. I have no other explanation.
<img src="http://www.boincstats.com/stats/banner.php?cpid=d2319b8f0ad14565556d0ba45b64e779">
ID: 79054 · Report as offensive
Profile Paul D. Buck
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 00
Posts: 3898
Credit: 1,158,042
RAC: 0
United States
Message 79049 - Posted: 13 Feb 2005, 15:07:13 UTC

In theory, the average number of WU and Results should be the same each day. But, with the connect every "x" being set differently, and people like me that "flush" our results daily, these numbers are not likely to ever be in balance.

So, minor fluctuations in results returned add turbulence to the process flow and may add to our troubles.
ID: 79049 · Report as offensive
Profile Dunc
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Jul 02
Posts: 129
Credit: 2,166,460
RAC: 0
United States
Message 79044 - Posted: 13 Feb 2005, 14:59:41 UTC
Last modified: 13 Feb 2005, 15:01:48 UTC

The validator is still working.

This



Is a good barometer of what is happening :)

Dunc

ID: 79044 · Report as offensive
Astro
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 79041 - Posted: 13 Feb 2005, 14:50:45 UTC

another 48k and we're right back to where we started after the migration. Hope this upward trend does not continue.

Ready to send 1,275,094
In progress 706,226
Waiting for validation 210,906
ID: 79041 · Report as offensive
Dave Mickey

Send message
Joined: 19 Oct 99
Posts: 178
Credit: 11,122,965
RAC: 0
United States
Message 79038 - Posted: 13 Feb 2005, 14:40:02 UTC


Well, what ever it is continues to happen at a good clip.

Last hour on the stat pages shows that the Q grew by
another 15,000. I think that's much faster growth
than what was occuring when the old machine was
trying (but not able) to keep up. So either the Q is
getting much more input, or having much less validation
done, than was happening before the change over.

Dave
ID: 79038 · Report as offensive
Antjest
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 27 Oct 99
Posts: 27
Credit: 19,796,139
RAC: 0
Slovenia
Message 79033 - Posted: 13 Feb 2005, 14:00:33 UTC

They probably remove WU's on the older server when queue got extremly large and are now inserting them back.
ID: 79033 · Report as offensive
Dave Mickey

Send message
Joined: 19 Oct 99
Posts: 178
Credit: 11,122,965
RAC: 0
United States
Message 79032 - Posted: 13 Feb 2005, 13:58:09 UTC


Yes, a very clear reversal of fortunes for the Validation Q -
it seems to have spent the last 10 or 12 hours adding several
thousand results per hour instead of clearing at that rate
as it had been since Friday. :(

Possible that an early-Sunday a.m. (CA time) cron job backup
or some such kicked in and took away resources from the DB or
or the validator? hmmm.

Dave
ID: 79032 · Report as offensive
Saimek

Send message
Joined: 25 Jan 00
Posts: 121
Credit: 454,423
RAC: 0
Poland
Message 79029 - Posted: 13 Feb 2005, 13:49:29 UTC

Yeah i noticed that today also =) strange... :/
ID: 79029 · Report as offensive
Astro
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Apr 02
Posts: 8026
Credit: 600,015
RAC: 0
Message 79028 - Posted: 13 Feb 2005, 13:46:06 UTC

Yesterday the number stuck around 143K give or take some, then this morning I see

Ready to send 1,279,362
In progress 1,713,462
Waiting for validation 199,788

Given that the new server was reducing this number by 6k/hr it should be down to zero (relative to new incoming units).

Hope nothings broke.

tony

ID: 79028 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

Message boards : Number crunching : Waiting for Validation


 
©2020 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.