21)
Message boards :
Politics :
'Ordinary people'?
(Message 1541195)
Posted 13 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post: Life starts at conception. Potential is the female egg and male sperm. After they meet we have unique DNA of a human life. A human life, with all laws of the land applying to this human being. If this human has committed a crime worthy of taking his/her life then make the charge and let the law have it's way with them. If not, if you don't make the charge then you are just a guilty as the mother of the crime of murder, by accomplice. The unique DNA is more reliable then a fingerprint, so make the charge upon this person and state your reasons for wanting the death penalty applied to him/her. |
22)
Message boards :
Politics :
More on how Neo-Darwinism has it wrong again...
(Message 1541022)
Posted 13 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post: More fallacy! Well done you two! You lost the argument when you embraced fallacy... |
23)
Message boards :
Politics :
'Ordinary people'?
(Message 1541018)
Posted 13 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post: More fallacy, once again this time it's called killing the messenger. You do so in order to not address the topic. In person this works better then print. In print it looks just like what I have pointed out, you have address the messenger not the topic. I have not used the Bible in this argument---at all, nor have any of you used it correctly. LMAO! Life starts at conception. Potential is the female egg and male sperm. After they meet we have unique DNA of a human life. Please insert your science here, not opinion, or fallacy, or any stupid and ignorant jokes. Thank you for your time in this matter... |
24)
Message boards :
Politics :
More on how Neo-Darwinism has it wrong again...
(Message 1540968)
Posted 13 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post: More fallacy! Well done you two! Now address the topic not the messenger, thank you. |
25)
Message boards :
Politics :
'Ordinary people'?
(Message 1540965)
Posted 13 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post:
You have based your argument on a rhetorical fallacy. That is why and how I have kicked your a$$. I understand and use the proper tactic. You need to understand and change your tactic to match or better my tactic. Wars are won and lost in much the same way.... You have lost, get better... Human life starts at conception. |
26)
Message boards :
Politics :
More on how Neo-Darwinism has it wrong again...
(Message 1540949)
Posted 13 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post:
Thank you for your logical fallacy; I will add this to your vary long list. You have not had enough time to review the links, so you have not done the background work to make the baseless claim you have made here. Thank you for doing that, it makes you look very bad and I didn't have to do it myself. Just because you disagree with the findings does not make it wrong. And the second link does link other scientists with similar views, had you bothered before opening up your big mouth..., ... but I wouldn't be able to jab you in the ribs if you hadn't of been yourself..., ...thank you. |
27)
Message boards :
Politics :
'Ordinary people'?
(Message 1540941)
Posted 13 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post:
It's because you have based your "shakey" findings on a logical fallacy. Thank you... |
28)
Message boards :
Politics :
Corporations are people?
(Message 1540936)
Posted 13 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post: Wait till the Sisters (Catholic) case gets to SCOTUS, your head will spontaneously blow up! LOL! |
29)
Message boards :
Politics :
'Ordinary people'?
(Message 1540930)
Posted 13 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post: Clyde left a great Mark Twain quote for you. Get a good look at it did you? |
30)
Message boards :
Politics :
More on how Neo-Darwinism has it wrong again...
(Message 1540927)
Posted 13 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post: The cambrian "explosion" represents the time period during which complex body organization arose. However, it is important to note that multi-cell organisms existed before the cambrian expansion (fact), that the "explosion" covered 30-40 millions years and was not instantaneous (fact), and that this was the time period in which hard skeletons/shells evolved, which are much more likely to be preserved in the fossil record (fact). Our knowledge of organisms occurring before this period is therefore limited by the available fossil record. This period is also associated with major changes in the environment and increased oxygen levels, which may have contributed to rapid changes in environmental niches that favored (hypothesis). Its a fascinating area of scientific research which will continue to yield important clues to species diversification. To date, no record of a designer or biology labs or spaceships or foot prints etc has been found in the cambrian shale. Should we find such evidence, we scientists will be very excited to share it with you. Why Intelligent Design Describes the Cambrian Explosion 10 minutes... Darwin's Dilemma 1 hour and 13 minutes... The Privileged Planet 1 hour and 30 minutes.... Real scientist's, peer reviewed and in respected publications. |
31)
Message boards :
Politics :
Climate Change, 'Greenhouse' effects: DENIAL (#3)
(Message 1540916)
Posted 13 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post: [url]Comet's, Jellystone National Park with Yogi, all better odds then global warming killing us...[/url] Are you going to come to a point? It would be nice. Odds of being killed by a 10 mile comet or Jellystone blowing up are still better then being killed by global warming. Hands down, this is a fact... LOL! |
32)
Message boards :
Politics :
'Ordinary people'?
(Message 1540915)
Posted 13 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post: ...all of them--really that stupid. |
33)
Message boards :
Politics :
'Ordinary people'?
(Message 1540914)
Posted 13 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post:
a hardy---+1! |
34)
Message boards :
Politics :
Corporations are people?
(Message 1540911)
Posted 13 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." translation... Congress, shall not establish a Faith at the federal level, or disallow a state to have theirs, the federal government shall not disallow any individual the right to speak and address congress and the same applies to the press, the people have the right to join together in any form they seem to want or need, and the one as well as a whole state can fully address the federal government to make or remove laws as seen fit by the people. |
35)
Message boards :
Politics :
Climate Change, 'Greenhouse' effects: DENIAL (#3)
(Message 1540564)
Posted 12 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post: Comet's, Jellystone National Park with Yogi, all better odds then global warming killing us... |
36)
Message boards :
Politics :
'Ordinary people'?
(Message 1540561)
Posted 12 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post: The last 4 people who have posted here are quite ignorant of a thing called a fact... |
37)
Message boards :
Politics :
'Ordinary people'?
(Message 1540560)
Posted 12 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2013/jun/18/do-rapes-result-fewer-pregnancies-consensual-inter/ |
38)
Message boards :
Politics :
'Ordinary people'?
(Message 1540558)
Posted 12 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post: All told, there were 315 rape victims of reproductive age in this sample, resulting in 20 rape-related pregnancies. In an interview, Dean. G. Kilpatrick, one of the researchers and director of the National Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center at the Medical University of South Carolina, acknowledged that, given the sample size, it might have been appropriate to provide a confidence interval. Still, he added, “most people who have looked at the methodology were pretty satisfied that this is a reasonable way to go about it.†The study concluded that in one year, this rate would result in more than 32,000 rape-related pregnancies, which Kilpatrick said would be about 50,000 a year when adjusted to today’s population. RAINN, using the same incidence rate, calculates about 3,200 pregnancies. Though the study is nearly two decades old, it has not been updated. The 5 percent figure is a little higher than a separate study that estimates the chance of getting pregnant from a single act of unprotected sex was 3.1 percent; a European study pegged the chances of getting pregnant as 25 percent at two days before ovulation but a 5 percent average over the rest of the cycle, though the possibilities rapidly dwindled within days of ovulation. Indeed, a 2002 study speculated that the incidence of pregnancy from rape could be even higher — 6.4 percent — in part because women have no choice in refusing sex, whereas in consensual sex a woman may refuse if she thinks the chances of pregnancy are higher. |
39)
Message boards :
Politics :
'Ordinary people'?
(Message 1540557)
Posted 12 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post: 1996 by the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, which determined a national rape-related pregnancy rate of 5.0 percent per rape among victims between the ages of 12 and 45. The study was based on a survey of 4008 adult women, over a three-year period, which covered a range of questions on drug and alcohol abuse but also included questions intended to draw out information on sexual assaults. |
40)
Message boards :
Politics :
'Ordinary people'?
(Message 1540556)
Posted 12 Jul 2014 by Intelligent Design Post: The last three post were by ignorant/stupid people... |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.