Posts by Bob DeWoody

1) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : How soon will planet 9 be found? (Message 1856964)
Posted 3 days ago by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
According to the science channel astronomers have already narrowed down the area to be searched for planet 9. But is still a big patch of space.
2) Message boards : SETI@home Science : Why do we keep listening to an "illegal" frequency? (Message 1853457)
Posted 18 days ago by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
Why would aliens consider it an illegal frequency?
3) Message boards : SETI@home Science : Why do we keep listening to an "illegal" frequency? (Message 1853394)
Posted 18 days ago by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
Huh ??

+1
4) Message boards : Cafe SETI : Diabetes: Anything You Want to Discuss or Post (Message 1852292)
Posted 21 days ago by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
I was "pre-diabetic" for many years based maining on my blood sugar levels. I have been treated now for about 6 years as having type 2 diabetes and again the major symptom has been high blood sugar. I really think what they call it should be broken up into at least three separate diseases. I hate cook book medicine where a diagnosis is based on some numbers that come back from a blood test without any visual or physical back up symptoms. Isn't it possible that some of us can have higher than "normal" levels of blood sugar without being diabetic. But once you are listed in the system as having this disease there is nothing you can do to refute it unless you want to risk loosing the rest of your medicare benefits.
5) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : SpaceX ready to launch again. (Message 1850763)
Posted 29 days ago by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
I understand now how they are able to boost a payload to orbital velocity and then return the first stage back to earth and land it. Small payloads that don't require much more than half the rocket's capability therefore leaving enough fuel for a controlled landing. Two tonnes is a pretty small load.
6) Message boards : SETI@home Science : Planet Hunters Report Record-Breaking Discovery, Search for other habitable planets (Message 1850689)
Posted 29 days ago by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
Here's a NASA link to the Trappist system. https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-telescope-reveals-largest-batch-of-earth-size-habitable-zone-planets-around
7) Message boards : SETI@home Science : Exchange Credit to Gridcoin (Message 1850250)
Posted 20 Feb 2017 by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
People contribute their computer time to these projects without expectation of any monetary reward, rather for the satisfaction of knowing they contributed to the achievement of the greatest quest in the scientific world.
8) Message boards : Cafe SETI : SyFy series "The Expanse" (Message 1845951)
Posted 2 Feb 2017 by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
Season 2 of this series started Wed., Feb 1st. It is set about 200 years in the future. Mars is being colonized as well as several of the larger asteroids. The plot deals with political conflict between the several colonies and earth. All the space hardware has been carefully thought out and spaceflight is handled in a plausible authentic way. The program is gaining popularity as it is presented like a big budget theatrical movie.
9) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Dark matter/Dark Energy (Message 1845714)
Posted 1 Feb 2017 by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
New programming in "How the Universe Works" was aired Tuesday evening regarding Dark Matter. It was basically an hour of speculation concerning the nature of and possible effects of whatever it is. No new revelations of discoveries. I think it really bugs the scientific world that they have almost no clue about the nature of what they believe constitutes 86% of the matter in the universe.
10) Message boards : Politics : US Elections 2016 (Message 1843911)
Posted 23 Jan 2017 by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
Like always, people's point of view is colored by their politics.
11) Message boards : Politics : US Elections 2016 (Message 1843882)
Posted 23 Jan 2017 by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
I watched a documentary on the History Channel yesterday about Donald Trump and his path to the White House. If that had been aired before the election I might have voted for him. It's amazing how many of his old elitist friends turned their backs on him.
12) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : British Antarctic suvey to be pulled out (Message 1842731)
Posted 17 Jan 2017 by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
From what I read it is only a temporary measure until the stability of the ice shelf is restored.
13) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : How soon will planet 9 be found? (Message 1841985)
Posted 13 Jan 2017 by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
Last year, scientists spotted signs which offered a hint that there is a huge, unseen world lurking at the edge of our solar system – ‘Planet Nine’.

The giant, hidden planet is thought to be 10 times more massive than Earth – and on an orbit which takes 10,000 or 20,000 years to go round the sun.

But the story of Planet 9 might be even odder than first believed – as scientists say it may once have been a ‘rogue’, free-roaming planet which was captured by our solar system.
It's all conjecture, no proof at all. Why are people so wanting it to be true???

+1 Yes the wild speculation that goes on about planet 9 in particular and exoplanets in general amazes me.
14) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Possible way to find new Kuiper Belt objects. (Message 1841623)
Posted 12 Jan 2017 by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
So, it wasn't a bad idea, just not a new one. It seems to me then that, assuming it's there, planet nine should be spotted using this method sooner or later.
15) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Possible way to find new Kuiper Belt objects. (Message 1841587)
Posted 12 Jan 2017 by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
The traditional way to find new objects orbiting the sun is by looking at images of the same small region of space and finding faint objects that are moving across the star field and ultimately determining the objects orbital path. I'm thinking that maybe some larger objects that are too faint to be seen might momentarily block the light from background stars that they pass in front of and create a pattern that can be used to calculate the object's orbit. Is this a silly idea. and could this method be used to determine the size of the object?
16) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : New star predicted to ignite in Cygnus Constellation in 2022 (Message 1841243)
Posted 10 Jan 2017 by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
The "Boom" star as it is called will form from the collision of two small stars that are not currently visible to the naked eye. At 1,800LY distance it is predicted that for a time it will be the second brightest object in the night sky.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2017/01/06/spectacular-collision-suns-will-create-new-star-night-sky-2022/
17) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : The Voyagers’ (Message 1841031)
Posted 9 Jan 2017 by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
I wasn't thinking of optical detection. I'm just wondering how long the radio telescopes will be able to pick out the Voyager's radio transmissions from the static.
18) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : The Voyagers’ (Message 1840889)
Posted 8 Jan 2017 by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
Any estimate on when the Voyager signals will get too weak to be picked out of the background noise? It amazes me that they can be detected even now.
19) Message boards : SETI@home Science : Do you think aliens use radio waves to communicate with each other? (Message 1840610)
Posted 7 Jan 2017 by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
A lot of these new propulsion ideas sound great until they get to the end of the description where they mention in passing that it would need to harness the energy of a star to make it go anywhere. No time soon I presume.
20) Message boards : SETI@home Science : Do you think aliens use radio waves to communicate with each other? (Message 1839825)
Posted 3 Jan 2017 by Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
I already suggested that Bob! Message 1839568

I have to say that I am very sceptical about flying saucers. If they were as prolific as people suggest some time in the last 100 years one would have crashed somewhere (not Roswell!!) and been reverse engineered making mankind a lot further advanced than we are now.

For instance, look at what it takes to put a man on the moon, and bring him back. Look what it takes to make a trip to the ISS and back. We are many years away from something like the Enterprise orbiting Earth and their shuttle craft popping up and down. For this exercise I'll discount their transporter system.

My thinking behind this is that if a UFO is real, then it by default doesn't come from earth. Therefore Is it based in our Solar system even on a planet we haven't found yet? Or is it based in another star system somewhere, the nearest one being 4 LY away. Either way whoever or whatever controls them must have technology that we can only dream of, and are surprisingly a bit haphazard to say the least in exposing themselves then zapping off to avoid getting caught. Their technology would know that earthbound radars and satellites could track their performance as indeed they do.

I think that if UFO's exist they are likely to be remote controlled drones of some kind, I doubt their makers are inside them. A drone is expendable, a "person" isn't. In which case where is the mother ship?

I have no real answer to anal probes and cattle mutilations, other than to say that if they have interplanetary travel nailed down and even interstellar travel, then they would not need to be so crude to find out more about us. They would use whole body MRI scanners or more likely Bones diagnostic couches in Enterprise sick bay, maybe even what the Doctor used as a handheld in USS Voyager.

At the end of the day there is no conclusive evidence for any ET really is there, just a lot of anomalies and occurrences that we simply cannot explain. Plus of course the pseudo sci fi press that encourage it all to make a living. The possibilities are

There is no-one there
We are looking in the wrong place
We are using the wrong search tools
They don't want to be found.

Given the vastness of interstellar space it is likely that there are others out there somewhere, but so far away that neither of us will ever know that the other exists. Earth is 4.5 Billion years old, at best guess we believe the observable universe that we can detect is about 13.8 billion years old. WE are the teenagers on the block. It would be like putting a fish in the Atlantic at England and one at New York, and hoping that one day they might meet up!!

OK, I see now that you touched on the idea briefly. Sometimes it is hard in a thread like this one that has become full of off topic chatter and ramblings that have nothing to do with the original subject.


Next 20


 
©2017 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.