Posts by Skywalker66 @ Berlin


log in
1) Message boards : Number crunching : Anonyme Plattform ??? (Message 1375935)
Posted 474 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
I see many Users run with app_info and optimised clients. On this accounts there show not anonyme plattform ... there show the complete version

Can anyone give me the right tip to switch my app_info to show the right version

Thanks

2) Questions and Answers : GPU applications : NVidia GTX 460 (Message 1293193)
Posted 711 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
When you have problems with your overclock. I think your GPu-Clock is to high !!!

my 460 goes correctly only to 758 MHZ stable. higher gets offen crashes

greetings
3) Message boards : Number crunching : HE connection problems thread (Message 1129453)
Posted 1160 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
I JUST got the rest of my work uploaded through a very slow PROXY. I hope they find an answer this problem Soon.


The problem is since over one month ... it seems nobody work on the problem. it have only a little bit of user the connect-problem who want to connect Berkeley. that is not to heavy ..... [that is ironic]
4) Message boards : Number crunching : HE connection problems thread (Message 1122187)
Posted 1181 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
tracert 208.68.240.13

Routenverfolgung zu boinc2.ssl.berkeley.edu [208.68.240.13] über maximal 30 Abs
chnitte:

1 21 ms 18 ms 17 ms lo1.br08.ber.de.hansenet.net [xxx.xxx.xx.xx]
2 17 ms 17 ms 19 ms ae1-102.cr02.ber.de.hansenet.net [62.109.108.126
]
3 34 ms 38 ms 34 ms so-0-2-0-0.cr01.fra.de.hansenet.net [213.191.87.
189]
4 37 ms 36 ms 43 ms ae1-0.xd01.fra.de.hansenet.net [62.109.69.6]
5 38 ms 37 ms 35 ms ae0-0.pr03.decix.de.hansenet.net [213.191.66.138
]
6 43 ms 36 ms 38 ms 20gigabitethernet4-3.core1.fra1.he.net [80.81.19
2.172]
7 58 ms 55 ms 55 ms 10gigabitethernet1-2.core1.par1.he.net [72.52.92
.89]
8 55 ms 55 ms 56 ms 10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.par2.he.net [184.105.
213.90]
9 129 ms 128 ms 142 ms 10gigabitethernet7-1.core1.ash1.he.net [184.105.
213.93]
10 211 ms 199 ms 203 ms 10gigabitethernet7-4.core1.pao1.he.net [184.105.
213.177]
11 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
12 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
13 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
14 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
15 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
16 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
17 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.


nslookup 208.68.240.13
Server: dnsp03.hansenet.de
Address: 213.191.74.12

Name: boinc2.ssl.berkeley.edu
Address: 208.68.240.13


Location : Germany
ISP : Alice / O2
Start: 15.06.2011
no adress can pinged or tracert
5) Message boards : Number crunching : to the Seti staff (Message 1121007)
Posted 1184 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
I just called my ISP and they are not blocking anything also they have no plans to go with IPv6 in the near future.
They also tried tracing and pinging all of the URL#s and got the same thing that I did and said the problem seems to be with the Hurricane routing.

Jim

Jim...
Hang in there a bit.
I have contacted Eric and asked if somebody had time to check into it from their end with Hurricane. No promises, but I made the inquiry.



that is wonderfull

many, many thanks for your work from me to you and i think from all non-connectors too


6) Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (49) Server problems? (Message 1120996)
Posted 1184 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
Maybe the internet connection/hardware/ISP of S@h don't support IPv6?


- Best regards! - Sutaru Tsureku, team seti.international founder. - Optimize your PC for higher RAC. - SETI@home needs your help. -

Only since 15 June?


ups... bad humor attack ! lol
this were very heavy
7) Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (49) Server problems? (Message 1120968)
Posted 1184 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
You both don't have IPv6 enabled in the OS, or? ;-)

---------------------------------------

What is if you test all the URLs from here in 'message 1120872', in your browser?



- Best regards! - Sutaru Tsureku, team seti.international founder. - Optimize your PC for higher RAC. - SETI@home needs your help. -


no it is deinstalled, on Xp make ipV6 in the aktuall time surfing so slow, without speed is double so high...
8) Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (49) Server problems? (Message 1120853)
Posted 1184 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
Can u please also test it with:
ping -l 1500 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu
(after the dash, this is a small L :-) )

At least the German ping version needs the -f flag in conjunction with the -l flag:
ping -a -l 1448 -f 208.68.240.20
Ping setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu [208.68.240.20] mit 1448 Bytes Daten:
Antwort von 208.68.240.20: Bytes=1448 Zeit=245ms TTL=53

With -l 1449, I get
Paket müsste fragmentiert werden, DF-Flag ist jedoch gesetzt.

Gruß,
Gundolf


ping -a -l 1448 -f 208.68.240.20

Ping setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu [208.68.240.20] mit 1448 Bytes Daten:

Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.
Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.

Ping-Statistik für 208.68.240.20:
Pakete: Gesendet = 4, Empfangen = 0, Verloren = 4 (100% Verlust),


and i have contact my provider, there no changes or test in the last time, have spoken with a technican ... so i make easy on this time the question when IPv6 starts ;-)
9) Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (49) Server problems? (Message 1120803)
Posted 1185 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
Can u please also test it with:
ping -l 1500 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu
(after the dash, this is a small L :-) )


Highlander,
you bring me to a new idea to test, like the Server is to heavy busy....


ping -w 103000 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu


Ping setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu [208.68.240.20] mit 32 Bytes Daten:
Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung.


this is not the right thing
10) Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (49) Server problems? (Message 1120798)
Posted 1185 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
Can u please also test it with:
ping -l 1500 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu
(after the dash, this is a small L :-) )



ping -l 1500 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu

Ping setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu [208.68.240.20] mit 1500 Bytes Daten:

Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung. /timeoverflow
Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung. /timeoverflow
Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung. /timeoverflow
Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung. /timeoverflow

Ping-Statistik für 208.68.240.20:
Pakete: Gesendet = 4, Empfangen = 0, Verloren = 4 (100% Verlust/Lost),
11) Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (49) Server problems? (Message 1120766)
Posted 1185 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
Command prompt commands,
ipconfig/flushdns did nothing.
tracert to berkeley stopped about 3 hops short. (208.68.240.20)
Ping timed out 5 times in a row. (208.68.240.20)
I would hate to detach/Reattach and lose all of the work on my boxes.
I don't want to reset S@H.
All of my equiptment checked out.
My ISP and or firewalls aren't the problem.(Called my ISP)
And ALL of my other projects are having a Blast.
I don't know what to do...I'm Stumped. :((

Only a guess, but could it be the old problem with DNS not resolving properly?

Try entering these lines in the HOSTS file:

208.68.240.16 setiboincdata.ssl.berkeley.edu
208.68.240.20 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu
208.68.240.13 boinc2.ssl.berkeley.edu

And restart Boinc.


i have make it and it did not clean the problem
12) Message boards : Number crunching : to the Seti staff (Message 1120751)
Posted 1185 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
2 te1-4.dsr01.hstntx1.networklayer.com (207.218.223.5) 0.365 ms 0.440 ms 0.343 ms
3 po16.dsr02.hstntx2.networklayer.com (70.87.253.105) 0.648 ms po15.dsr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (70.87.253.109) 0.806 ms po16.dsr02.hstntx2.networklayer.com (70.87.253.105) 0.807 ms
4 e5-4.ibr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (74.55.252.37) 0.760 ms e5-2.ibr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (74.55.252.33) 0.509 ms e5-4.ibr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (74.55.252.37) 0.511 ms
5 e5-4.ibr03.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.253.49) 6.525 ms 6.562 ms 6.329 ms
6 te2-2.dsr01.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.255.26) 7.579 ms te3-5.dsr01.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.253.86) 10.335 ms te9-1.dsr02.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.253.22) 6.582 ms
7 e4-3.ibr04.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.255.37) 6.534 ms e6-1.ibr04.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.255.45) 6.346 ms e4-4.ibr04.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.255.41) 6.638 ms
8 10gigabitethernet3-1.core1.dal1.he.net (206.223.118.37) 6.524 ms 14.360 ms 6.442 ms
9 10gigabitethernet1-2.core1.phx1.he.net (72.52.92.253) 27.409 ms 27.596 ms 27.417 ms
10 10gigabitethernet2-2.core1.lax1.he.net (72.52.92.249) 36.911 ms 36.856 ms 37.656 ms
11 10gigabitethernet1-3.core1.pao1.he.net (72.52.92.21) 54.404 ms 45.356 ms 45.403 ms
12 64.71.140.42 (64.71.140.42) 45.631 ms 45.844 ms 45.382 ms
13 208.68.243.254 (208.68.243.254) 79.877 ms 84.566 ms 76.888 ms
14 * * *
15 * * *

i have win 7 and xp , both not connecting
and i have tested, all version 6.10.60 and 6.12.26 with a new fresh and clean installation will not connecting. she downloads the Master File from server and then nothing
13) Message boards : Number crunching : to the Seti staff (Message 1120554)
Posted 1185 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
I think the point being made is that if some users can connect, then the problem cannot be SETI's as your first post requests them to fix the issue.

If some users can connect and others cannot, then the problem must exist somewhere in between those who cannot connect and Berkeley.


this answer is to easy for me. it must be mysterious that with the server damage on 27.5.2011 and with the new start. At this exact time point, any providers begin to start to change anything on her cables and configuration ? And then not omly one Provider ? Never .......

on my sytem were no great changes go and my system was running fine with Berkeley in the last years. only to 15.06.2011

the change by me is only Boinc 6.12.26 !!!! And it work no downgrade on 6.10.60 like before. only a fresh installation and lost many datas
14) Message boards : Number crunching : to the Seti staff (Message 1120494)
Posted 1185 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
that what i say, many users can connect.... any no go. Do you think i go from my free will over a proxy? in the last 10 years i go always direct.

i am grey hairy while to many test come to kill the connect problem ;-) ;-)
are any users like me blacklisted on the server ? ;-) lol
15) Message boards : Number crunching : to the Seti staff (Message 1120467)
Posted 1185 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
funny...I realize that it's not working for everyone, I have two win7 boxes
that aren't working myself.

here's info from this linux box...


laptop@laptop-laptop:~$ traceroute 208.68.240.20
traceroute to 208.68.240.20 (208.68.240.20), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 10.141.70.1 (10.141.70.1) 1.459 ms 2.449 ms 3.200 ms
2 134.163.4.193 (134.163.4.193) 14.921 ms 15.155 ms 15.363 ms
3 134.163.136.10 (134.163.136.10) 15.644 ms 15.787 ms 15.948 ms
4 icapl250.shellus.com (134.163.253.250) 16.209 ms 16.427 ms 16.580 ms
5 12.119.213.117 (12.119.213.117) 16.905 ms 17.121 ms 17.548 ms
6 cr2.hs1tx.ip.att.net (12.123.212.198) 25.399 ms 21.568 ms 26.122 ms
7 cr1.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.122.28.157) 22.785 ms 24.318 ms 22.947 ms
8 dlstx01jt.ip.att.net (12.122.80.41) 29.475 ms 31.002 ms 31.223 ms
9 192.205.32.190 (192.205.32.190) 26.120 ms 27.988 ms 192.205.34.82 (192.205.34.82) 28.243 ms
10 Hurrican-Electric-LLC.Port-channel100.ar3.SJC2.gblx.net (64.214.174.246) 76.400 ms 76.206 ms 76.527 ms
11 10gigabitethernet3-2.core1.pao1.he.net (72.52.92.69) 79.053 ms 73.272 ms 79.158 ms
12 64.71.140.42 (64.71.140.42) 65.281 ms 64.939 ms 64.903 ms
13 208.68.243.254 (208.68.243.254) 93.221 ms 93.790 ms 93.927 ms
14 * * *
15 * * *
16 * * *
17 * * *
18 * * *


followed by:


Thu 23 Jun 2011 09:39:30 AM CDT Running CPU benchmarks
Thu 23 Jun 2011 09:39:30 AM CDT Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
Thu 23 Jun 2011 09:40:01 AM CDT Benchmark results:
Thu 23 Jun 2011 09:40:01 AM CDT Number of CPUs: 2
Thu 23 Jun 2011 09:40:01 AM CDT 1550 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
Thu 23 Jun 2011 09:40:01 AM CDT 3819 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Thu 23 Jun 2011 09:40:03 AM CDT Resuming computation
Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:34:47 AM CDT SETI@home Computation for task 12ap11ab.12159.8403.12.10.207_0 finished
Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:34:47 AM CDT SETI@home Starting 13dc10ab.10471.4727.11.10.182_1
Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:34:47 AM CDT SETI@home Starting task 13dc10ab.10471.4727.11.10.182_1 using setiathome_enhanced version 603
Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:34:49 AM CDT SETI@home Started upload of 12ap11ab.12159.8403.12.10.207_0_0
Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:34:52 AM CDT SETI@home Finished upload of 12ap11ab.12159.8403.12.10.207_0_0
Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:51:34 AM CDT SETI@home update requested by user
Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:51:38 AM CDT SETI@home Sending scheduler request: Requested by user.
Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:51:38 AM CDT SETI@home Reporting 2 completed tasks, not requesting new tasks
Thu 23 Jun 2011 10:51:41 AM CDT SETI@home Scheduler request completed

and the 2 tasks were uploaded.

the *** is not an error. The routers are simply programmed to not respond
to ping requests....ie no DOS ability

Kevin


hello Kevin
it want to show that any People tests for this problem ( like Threat http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=64523) from differen providers and Computers[/url]

and not at all the test picture site of the server are working and shown.

for a few days i have a pc from my farm here, here is it not connecting, he go at home, plug in his modem and can connecting... no differns in the configuration were changed ......... ???????????

greetings
Thomas

16) Message boards : Number crunching : to the Seti staff (Message 1120447)
Posted 1185 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
Please check your Network, it is not working for all people that helps you for the project.....

since many days the scheduler and up and download server can´t connecting for all people. It is no error by the users. a user from here means, this must be a bad routing table map in seti server !!! ??????

here a official test by external site by traceroute.org to the seti server (208.68.240.20):

2 te1-4.dsr01.hstntx1.networklayer.com (207.218.223.5) 0.348 ms 0.396 ms 0.366 ms
3 po15.dsr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (70.87.253.109) 0.936 ms po16.dsr02.hstntx2.networklayer.com (70.87.253.105) 0.785 ms po15.dsr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (70.87.253.109) 0.971 ms
4 e5-2.ibr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (74.55.252.33) 0.724 ms e5-4.ibr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (74.55.252.37) 0.740 ms e5-2.ibr01.hstntx2.networklayer.com (74.55.252.33) 0.703 ms
5 e5-4.ibr03.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.253.49) 6.502 ms 6.289 ms 6.820 ms
6 te9-1.dsr02.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.253.22) 6.318 ms te9-1.dsr01.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.253.6) 6.566 ms te2-2.dsr01.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.255.26) 6.311 ms
7 e4-3.ibr04.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.255.37) 6.536 ms e4-4.ibr04.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.255.41) 6.271 ms e4-3.ibr04.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.255.37) 6.500 ms
8 10gigabitethernet3-1.core1.dal1.he.net (206.223.118.37) 7.480 ms 14.341 ms 6.438 ms
9 10gigabitethernet1-2.core1.phx1.he.net (72.52.92.253) 37.671 ms 27.363 ms 27.398 ms
10 10gigabitethernet2-2.core1.lax1.he.net (72.52.92.249) 40.910 ms 37.371 ms 37.127 ms
11 10gigabitethernet1-3.core1.pao1.he.net (72.52.92.21) 47.414 ms 52.799 ms 50.149 ms
12 64.71.140.42 (64.71.140.42) 45.697 ms 45.592 ms 45.638 ms
13 208.68.243.254 (208.68.243.254) 80.634 ms 77.827 ms 76.837 ms
14 * * *
15 * * *

* * * = error

my option for the time is, i use a free proxy port from sites or people. This is heavy dangerous, also it works. Only the most free proxys close after a day or i must actual the ip. that is no funny. and not all do work with RPC

greetings



PS: a official answer were wonderful
17) Message boards : Number crunching : Can't report or get new tasks (Message 1119450)
Posted 1188 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
I know this machine runs Linux, have you tried a reboot? Works many times for Windows machines.

A project reset is also an option but you would lose the work already on board and completed. Berkeley should resend the work after the reset but you would have to crunch it again. Last but best option in my view. After 6 days of non communication you have to do something!


I have considered it. But since this is a database server, I have to find time to do so.

About the other last replies:

The problem machine, and all the other machines are located on different internal LANs connected to a firewall which again is connected to Internet through a ADSL router. Rebooting the router will not help, since all other traffic seem to work quite well (both BOINC and non-BOINC communication).

If there has been anyhting wrong with the machines network connection, the database traffic would also suffer from this error. Downloading new WUs did not seem to be any problem a few days ago. Uploading them seem to work from time to time, but reporting them is not possible.

Also, BOINC on this machine is currently reporting "Retrieved header from server: 500 Internal server error". This tell me (based on several years experience with web-design and -programming using PHP, MySQL and Apache web server) that the server (in this case NOT my machine, but the server in the other end) has a problem.

But since no other seem to report this error, it can be caused by invalid data sent from my machine.

And again... thanks for all replies :)



Have you tried flushing the DNS cache on the machine in question?

Edit: you may have corrupt, or outdated DNS entries for the project.



self with flushing no connecting to the projekt, i go again over a proxy, that works :-(
18) Message boards : Number crunching : Can't report or get new tasks (Message 1119156)
Posted 1189 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
Still the same problem - the computer (id 5256434) will not report any tasks. According to http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/hosts_user.php?userid=7992989 this machine last reported June 14th while the other machines have reported completed works since then.

The other machine (id 5306094) is very similar and seem to work OK. Since I'm not able to find any solution to this, I'm about to give up this machine.... :(

Somebody in another thread found that using a proxy was a workaround for a similar situation. You might try something like Privoxy (with the filtering disabled).
Joe


That was i ;-)
greetz
19) Message boards : Number crunching : one of five won't connect at all (Message 1118676)
Posted 1190 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
mystery: after i set a proxy server in, i could connect scheduler and up / download Wu´s.... i was complete empty at this point

when i kill the proxy, no connection will done again
20) Message boards : Number crunching : one of five won't connect at all (Message 1118627)
Posted 1191 days ago by Profile Skywalker66 @ Berlin
i have the same

2 te1-4.dsr01.hstntx1.networklayer.com (207.218.223.5) 0.571 ms 1.199 ms 0.544 ms
3 e4-1.ibr02.hstntx1.networklayer.com (207.218.245.25) 0.579 ms 0.522 ms 0.898 ms
4 e3-4.ibr04.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.253.53) 5.355 ms 5.299 ms 5.355 ms
5 * * *
6 10gigabitethernet1-2.core1.phx1.he.net (72.52.92.253) 26.776 ms 26.932 ms 26.854 ms
7 10gigabitethernet2-2.core1.lax1.he.net (72.52.92.249) 36.630 ms 36.344 ms 36.929 ms
8 10gigabitethernet1-3.core1.pao1.he.net (72.52.92.21) 44.851 ms 53.818 ms 49.617 ms
9 64.71.140.42 (64.71.140.42) 44.904 ms 45.092 ms 45.368 ms
10 208.68.243.254 (208.68.243.254) 87.858 ms 87.330 ms 85.854 ms
11 * * *
12 * * *
13 * * *


Next 20

Copyright © 2014 University of California