Posts by paul

21) Message boards : Cafe SETI : Is is possible to have the seti folks trace the IP address of one of my machines? (Message 499114)
Posted 7 Jan 2007 by Profile paul
Post:
I'm following this too. We had a team member a couple of years back that got his laptop back the same way, with the cops tracing the IP returned by his SETI client running hidden as a service.

Edit: Same member got a client's PC back the same way with BOINC after an employee "misplaced" it.

Also, in both instances, Scott had given the information to the investigating officers, who quickly used the IP address to track down the suspect. Just give your investigating officer a call, they'll be thrilled to solve one so easily.
22) Message boards : Number crunching : Post Dual Core RAC's (Message 499092)
Posted 7 Jan 2007 by Profile paul
Post:
Hi John,

Joe Segur, along with Ben Herndon, Alex Kan and Eric Korpela (though Eric has a very busy schedule) are active at http://lunatics.at.

The new apps will undergo further testing and be released in the space of the next few weeks.

Right now, access to them is restricted to members of the pre-release testing and development group, but you won't have to wait too long :o)

Regards,
Simon.

Anxiously awaiting the new clients here! You and the coding crew's work is very much appreciated!

My dual core clients, all desktops substantially overclocked with good memory, using Simon's app across the board.-

(2) E6600's @ 3300 mhz one is at 2180 RAC, the other 1800, should rise to the same level
(1) E6400 @3300 mhz 1940 RAC
(1) E6300 @3300 mhz 2000 RAC, has had weird hdd issues lately, and has dropped off, but on the way back up
(2) 920/30D's @4000 mhz 1300/1400 RAC
(1) Core Duo 2.0Ghz laptop, 1000 RAC, has dropped a bit due to the occasional Pirates work received
23) Message boards : Team Recruitment Center : Introducing Team Starfire World BOINC (Message 498991)
Posted 7 Jan 2007 by Profile paul
Post:



Best wishes for the holiday season to TSWB!!


Same to you, Sarge, I hope you and yours have a great New year!

Happy Holidays from TSWB!

Xaak
Our Forums
irc://irc.teamstarfire.net:6667/team_starfire - IRC Channel
Live Chat




Check out some of our many projects below!

24) Message boards : Number crunching : BoincView 1.4 released (Message 497178)
Posted 4 Jan 2007 by Profile paul
Post:
When you use BOINCView to attach your hosts to a project - it brings up a list of projects to make the attaching process easier. Unfortunately, it was only current at the time when BOINCView was released (and it hasn't been updated in ver 1.4).

Thanks to Webmaster Yoda, you can download and install an updated list of projects to attach to.

The list is available as a zip file at http://www.boinc-australia.net/downloads/BV-Projects.zip

Instructions on its use are available here


Interesting TD, Thanks. :)

Indeed, now that is a useful feature, thanks!
25) Message boards : Number crunching : Uh-oh.......can't upload completed results? (Message 495530)
Posted 1 Jan 2007 by Profile paul
Post:
During this refusal by the U/L servers (or whatever) to accept returned results, the concensus seems to agree to "suspend network activity" using the drop downs in BOIN C Manager!

Done this and the /Messages Tab/ seems to report the command is being ignored.

To test this I shutdown BOINC, with the "suspend network activity" ON, and restarted after about 15 seconds, to cover residuals. The /Messages Tab/ reported the network activity resumed immediately after WU crunching was resumed.

If the network activity was then resuspended the /Messages Tab/ suggests this is being ignored still! This is from the reports in both the /Messages tab/ and the activity in the /Transfers Tab/ where the "trying to U/L WUs" just carry on with their countdown and retry!

Anyone else getting this problem, when I am trying to ease my demand on the server

I'm seeing the same thing on a Conroe running Crunch3r's 5.7.5.32 32bit client, but not on the standard 5.4.11 client.
26) Message boards : Number crunching : Chicken is user of the day (Message 495502)
Posted 1 Jan 2007 by Profile paul
Post:
Excellent, enjoy your 24 hours of stardom!
27) Message boards : Number crunching : No work from project? (Message 494500)
Posted 31 Dec 2006 by Profile paul
Post:
Just got a couple blades back on line, had to restart a switch after putting the old Zywall 2 back in service. Work had backed up, I received a handful of wu's, then it stopped, no work from project.
28) Message boards : Number crunching : dec 24 (Message 489895)
Posted 25 Dec 2006 by Profile paul
Post:
Merry Christmas to all!

borrowed from a friend-

Its coming on christmas
They're cutting down trees
They're putting up reindeer
And singing songs of joy and peace....
29) Message boards : Cafe SETI : SETI Chat (Message 489881)
Posted 25 Dec 2006 by Profile paul
Post:
Good seeing some familiar faces, and some new ones too, on this pleasant Christmas Eve. Thanks for stopping by, Sir Ulli, John Keck, frost, Janko, and whoever else may stop in later.

Merry Christmas to all!

[5:02pm] <@dapoohda> Its coming on christmas
[5:02pm] <@dapoohda> They're cutting down trees
[5:02pm] <@dapoohda> They're putting up reindeer
[5:03pm] <@dapoohda> And singing songs of joy and peace...

Paul
30) Message boards : Number crunching : T2500 or T5500 (Message 483090)
Posted 15 Dec 2006 by Profile paul
Post:
Hi. I tried to find this information, but i'm totally lack of time.
I'm going to buy a laptop (of course it will crunch BOINC). And now question: witch one will be better? (i mean higher RAC and/or lower power consumpion)
T2500-core duo 2000MHz or T5500-core 2 duo 1660MHz?
Or maybe one of Turion CPU's?


I checked with some people on our team running Conroe desktops @ 2Ghz to see wether or not I should replace my T2500 with a T7500, came to the conclusion that there was not going to be a huge difference in RAC between the 2 versions. Here's my laptop - Inspron E1705 with T2500

Of the cpu's you list, the T2500 would have the better RAC, IMO.

Paul
31) Message boards : Number crunching : best cruncher for under 500? (Message 482778)
Posted 15 Dec 2006 by Profile paul
Post:
How about a mobo with 965G chipset, like Asus P5PE-VM or Gigabyte GA-8I865GME-775, with inbuilt graphics and forget the graphics card.
Don't know US $ prices but they are both under £35 here, that should be less that $70 at present exchange rate.
edit] I just built cheapish system for friend on Tuesday and paid £89, thats approx $170 for 2*512 DDR2-800 corsair twinX (their cheapest) so going by that US prices are still cheaper. [/edit

Avoid the "G" version if possible. The memory bandwidth will be used (even if only a small amount) on graphics. You can get a really cheap graphics card instead.

The 945/65G boards I've seen do not have a PCI lock on them. So OC will be limited to 340fsb or so, and even then, your pci bus will be running pretty high. In my experience, not a good thing for a dedicated cruncher.

I'd also stay away from the 63, since the multi is low, you'll need some really fast ram to get a decent OC. Now, I'm not sure how far you'd like to go with the OC, a lot will depend on this. All my Conroes are running 3200-3350 Mhz. They start needing a bit more vcore at that point, which I'm hesitant to do for a 24/7 cruncher. The 63 needed some good binned fatbody d9's to run 470 Mhz to get there, the 64 , 420, the pair of 66's 370fsb. I'm running them all on Gigabyte's 965P S3's or DS3's, both boards perform the same for me.

Getting away from the 500 price tag a bit, but there is a lot of potential in the Conroe's, quite a few of our team members wish they would have spent a bit more on cpu and ram once it's all said and done....
32) Message boards : Cafe SETI : ***CLOSED*** (Message 463155)
Posted 22 Nov 2006 by Profile paul
Post:
Maverick, it seems that this Cafe@home is turning out to be
a great success!!

Yes John, thanks for saying so.

Cafe@Home has been going for just 11 days now, has 52 registered users and has made over two and a half thousand posts. We sure do chat!

I'm busy promoting this fantastic Cafe@Home forum. There are so many projects that could use Cafe@Home as their favorite cafe forum.

We are taking registrations right now - all are welcome to visit us just for a look :)




. . . thank You Paul (No. 52)




. . . thank You Paul (No. 52) Team Starfire World Boinc rock!

(I was team member of Team Starfire World Boinc just for one day, but now am one of their forum members for life :)

(or until they ask me for money for subscription or such :)

You see, Paul can belong to a team, and also to Cafe@Home. Everybody can! Not just Nobody:)


hey, my ears are buzzing..... glad to join your forum, here's to a great start!

Paul
33) Message boards : Number crunching : Downloading Problems (Message 457805)
Posted 14 Nov 2006 by Profile paul
Post:
I am going to take this opportunity to move some rigs around and do some upgrades. I hate taking rigs offline so what better time to do it than when I have no work!

Since its launch day I can now talk about the pair of 2.66ghz Quad Core Clovertown X5535 I am about to drop in my main SETI rig :) FAST! Top 20 in the world so far with just the 2.13ghz versions - when I upgrade I hope to get to number 1 (real number 1 - those merged clients dont count!)

Arghh! I'm jealous..... ;-) I'm waiting on the more mainstream Quads to come out....
34) Message boards : Number crunching : Downloading Problems (Message 457322)
Posted 14 Nov 2006 by Profile paul
Post:
I'm getting the same error message and 403 errors across the network....
35) Message boards : Team Recruitment Center : Introducing Team Starfire World BOINC (Message 429701)
Posted 2 Oct 2006 by Profile paul
Post:
We've just turned 2 months old, and are doing things no other BOINC team has done in such a short time. This is where I've wanted to be for a long time...

Paul
36) Message boards : Cafe SETI : TSWB hacked our Team page here at Berkeley (Message 413995)
Posted 3 Sep 2006 by Profile paul
Post:
As most may know TEAMSTARFIRE had a split and the other members formed a new team TEAMSTARFIRE World Boinc before leaving and transferring team founders they changed the team logo to their server. Knowing this is a long holiday week end they changed the team name and graphics. so that it would be hard to correct the changes they have made. This is an offense that Berkeley should not let pass with out penalties.

A: No, the pic was hosted on our server for quite some time, Hank. It was there long before the DCS actions forced us to form our own true World BOINC team, something we had long fought for.

B: You know what they say about assumptions..... The holiday weekend had nothing to do with it. What happened was a post was deleted where some TSWB members posted about passing their old team, DSLR Starfire, in Seti RAC. After all the recent events, and especially the heavy handed moderation that has been going on over there, the picture was replaced to show their extreme displeasure at the events. While I don't condone the action, I can certainly see how it came about.

Paul
37) Message boards : Number crunching : Strike requests (Message 329341)
Posted 7 Jun 2006 by Profile paul
Post:
I for one appreciate the long hours and tireless dedication to the project, Eric.

Your response echoes many of our opinions at BBR Team Starfire. While Starfire hasn't endorsed the strike, some of our members have switched to other projects until the bugs get worked out, a few in support of the strike, some actually ramped up production because of the it.

We feel the credit system is fair, even to the detriment of Starfire as a ranked team. My personal comparisons to the Rosetta credit on identical rigs shows Seti credit a bit low to it. What more could be asked for is roughly the same credit between BOINC projects?

I thank you for your time, and am sorry you've had to deal with this. I've yet to donate to the project directly, but will soon do just that, I've been inspired....

edited for clarity...

Paul
38) Message boards : Number crunching : A Resolution to the Credit Disagreement (Message 328907)
Posted 6 Jun 2006 by Profile paul
Post:
WinterKnight those numbers are numbers for optimized machines.

Im not sure which machine he was talking about for seti its either
This one or This one
Both of those are Penitum D's @4Ghz, same memory config, also, so either would work as a reference to my Rosestta D, shown here- http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/show_host_detail.php?hostid=226355

WinterKnight, I'll post some info in that thread for you when I have the chance.

Paul
39) Message boards : Number crunching : A Resolution to the Credit Disagreement (Message 328892)
Posted 6 Jun 2006 by Profile paul
Post:
I see absolutely no problem with the new credit system, since everyone else's RAC has dropped just as much. It did bother me a bit at first, until I wondered about the litmus test.....How does Enhanced RAC compare to other projects? Will two equally configured rigs report the same RAC, with each running a different project?

Does BBR know you are posting this? As a memeber of BBR I would think you would be at the Spearhead of the arguement for increasing it seeing how you guys pretty much had a lock down on the #1 spot you guys were out pretty much staying even with SETI.USA and we were all beating S.G by at least 100K a day. You were poised to pass S.G in 800 days and then we were going to pass you in something shy of 1300 days.

Now as it is you are getting completly dominated by S.G and SETI.USA

Im by no means trying to flame but I would think you guys would want to have the credit fixed a little bit in your favor.
Hehehe, I should hope they know I'm posting this. I'm the Starfire moderator. ;-)

We like RAC as much as the next guy. But to want it to favor our team, that's unethical. Here's Daniel's thread he posted at Starfire, hoping for our support- http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16224883

Also a couple other threads at Starfire pertaining to the "strike"-
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16223135
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16233949

Some of us have backed off on Seti this past month or so, until they get the bugs worked out. Some may back off because of the strike. Me, I'm on strike against the strike, and am ramping up Seti production.

Paul
40) Message boards : Number crunching : A Resolution to the Credit Disagreement (Message 328710)
Posted 6 Jun 2006 by Profile paul
Post:
With me not really trying to understand the method behind the old and new credit system, I still don't get why people are upset with the new credit system. Didn't we know back then that we were actually getting inflated credits with 4.1.X?

I had a 21K RAC back then, and have dropped to 9K. I also had the fastest Intel dual core in the world running Seti for a while. I adopted Enhanced as soon as it came out, even though I lost the crown immediately. I say this, because I am one of those who build large fleets with my own money, and tweak them as fast as I can. Given the power users arguments, I should be on their side

I see absolutely no problem with the new credit system, since everyone else's RAC has dropped just as much. It did bother me a bit at first, until I wondered about the litmus test.....How does Enhanced RAC compare to other projects? Will two equally configured rigs report the same RAC, with each running a different project?

I setup my D @4Ghz running Seti Enhanced, and the wife's D @4Ghz running Rosetta. Same fast ddr2 memory, same timings and speed. Gave them both several weeks to equalize a bit, the Seti rig kept dropping, but has leveled off, the Rosetta rig kept rising, has leveled off. Results? My Seti D is claiming 1545 RAC, wife's Rosetta D is claiming 1612.

This is how it should be, in my book. The playing field has been leveled.

Paul


Previous 20 · Next 20


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.