Posts by Francesco Forti |
![]() |
| log in |
|
41)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
I tricked seti to give me work.
(Message 1005312)
Posted 1073 days ago by Francesco Forti
I just managed to get some WUs by sitting back and doing nothing for the last few hours. I too. In m ost of the hosts this is working. In this one (http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1852935) I have received 14 tasks in the last 24 hours (and more) but the log is telling me that I have received my quota (104). Or that there is no job from the project. In this window: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/host_app_versions.php?hostid=1852935 I see "Number of tasks today" but if it means "Number of tasks sent today" it is wrong. I hope that tomorrow I receive some task. As told here: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=60388 on this Host I have a lot of lost results (results sent and reported but Berkeley doesn't knows it) so I think that the sistem is waiting for them, before sending me new job. Isn't it? I don't want to trick but SETI shouldn't loose work. FF |
|
42)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Quota and credit calculations. Not bad, not bad at all.
(Message 1005306)
Posted 1073 days ago by Francesco Forti
Even the autokill function should't penalize us. Because now SETI knows the application we use (CPU or GPU) and must be able not to send VLAR to GPU. So we have not to kill them. Who can agree? FF |
|
43)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Lost Results
(Message 1005181)
Posted 1073 days ago by Francesco Forti
Same for host http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1852935 In this moment I have no job to do in this host. Alla my cache is empty. Only 3 hours of job during last 24 hours. But if I look at "In progress Tasks: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=1852935&offset=0&show_names=0&state=1 I see 228 (!!) tasks from 4 to 13 Jun 2010. I have already uploaded and reported them. FF |
|
44)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Lost Results
(Message 1005162)
Posted 1073 days ago by Francesco Forti
I have an Host here computer 5381180 with 930 CPU and 260 Nvidia GPU. It's a new host (22 Apr 2010 11:16:10 UTC) and recently was out of work, for the problems of these days. Now is getting work again but I have seen that in the "In Progress Task" list I have a lot (about 40) of result, crunched, uploaded and reported, that are still "in progress". So it is as SETI didn't received my work. All received in the date 25 May 2010 12:12:06 UTC One is http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=616463467 I repeat: I am absolutely sure that the task was sent and reported to berkeley. If it's not only a problem of mine, I understand the growing pending. Franz More info: in that host I use optimized apps and reschedule |
|
45)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Reporting starts working
(Message 1004764)
Posted 1073 days ago by Francesco Forti
Here (CH) ... (by the way "Great Swiss performance aganist Spain ... Hop Swiss!!") I see upload OK and DL also working in same host without any task to do. But I see that in the host without job (as 1852935) I have a lot of tasks "in progress". This is not correct. In that host I have uploaded and sent all results. I see that the replica db is "running" and so this shouldn't be an error from it. What's the matter, again? FF |
|
46)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Message from server: (reached daily quota of 100 tasks)
(Message 1004540)
Posted 1074 days ago by Francesco Forti
The quota code has changed dramatically. Thanks for the info. I ask what happens 1) if a task is killed by autokill 2) if a task sent to the CPU is rescheduled to GPU (or viceversa) by reschedule Bye, FF |
|
47)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Message from server: (reached daily quota of 100 tasks)
(Message 1004398)
Posted 1075 days ago by Francesco Forti
I have finished all the job on http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=2693912 More info: 15.06.2010 07:57:06 SETI@home Message from server: No work sent 15.06.2010 07:57:06 SETI@home Message from server: No work is available for Astropulse v5 15.06.2010 07:57:06 SETI@home Message from server: Your app_info.xml file doesn't have a usable version of SETI@home Enhanced. 15.06.2010 07:57:06 SETI@home Message from server: (reached daily quota of 100 tasks) 15.06.2010 07:59:21 SETI@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 15.06.2010 07:59:21 SETI@home Requesting new tasks for GPU 15.06.2010 07:59:24 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 15.06.2010 07:59:24 SETI@home Message from server: Project has no jobs available 15.06.2010 07:59:39 SETI@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 15.06.2010 07:59:39 SETI@home Requesting new tasks for CPU 15.06.2010 07:59:41 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 15.06.2010 07:59:41 SETI@home Message from server: Project has no jobs available Sometimes I have a wrong app_info.xml, sometimes there is no job for me. I see that in the server status page SETI has "Results ready to send 324,302" and I see traffic in the newcricket/grapher so I think that SETI is not sending work to the optimized apps. Am I wrong? FF |
|
48)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Message from server: (reached daily quota of 100 tasks)
(Message 1004343)
Posted 1075 days ago by Francesco Forti
I have finished all the job on http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=2693912 So I have done "reset" and also detach ad attach. Results? 15.06.2010 07:56:47 SETI@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 15.06.2010 07:56:47 SETI@home Requesting new tasks for GPU 15.06.2010 07:56:49 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 15.06.2010 07:56:49 SETI@home Message from server: Project has no jobs available 15.06.2010 07:57:04 SETI@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 15.06.2010 07:57:04 SETI@home Requesting new tasks for CPU 15.06.2010 07:57:06 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 15.06.2010 07:57:06 SETI@home Message from server: No work sent 15.06.2010 07:57:06 SETI@home Message from server: No work is available for Astropulse v5 15.06.2010 07:57:06 SETI@home Message from server: Your app_info.xml file doesn't have a usable version of SETI@home Enhanced. 15.06.2010 07:57:06 SETI@home Message from server: (reached daily quota of 100 tasks) 15.06.2010 07:59:21 SETI@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 15.06.2010 07:59:21 SETI@home Requesting new tasks for GPU 15.06.2010 07:59:24 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 15.06.2010 07:59:24 SETI@home Message from server: Project has no jobs available 15.06.2010 07:59:39 SETI@home Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 15.06.2010 07:59:39 SETI@home Requesting new tasks for CPU 15.06.2010 07:59:41 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 15.06.2010 07:59:41 SETI@home Message from server: Project has no jobs available Bye, FF |
|
49)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
(Message 1003961)
Posted 1076 days ago by Francesco Forti
0.36 (newer) versus Lunatics_Win32v0.2_AP505r168_AKv8b_CudaV12.exe (older) Bye, FF |
|
50)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
(Message 1003941)
Posted 1076 days ago by Francesco Forti
On both hosts (one near the other) two days ago I have installed the newer Lunatics optimized application. One host (the quad core one) was without work but when the tasks arrived in the evening I have see this problem. I have seen that also in the other host (the 930 CPU) the same error, e lot of time in one hour. So after having written my message, I have reinstalled the previous version of Lunatics. Non more problem in the last 12 hours. I have also seen a lot of problem, in both computer, in LAN communication. Also this problem is now solved. FF |
|
51)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
(Message 1003752)
Posted 1076 days ago by Francesco Forti
New errors: 13.06.2010 20:49:03 SETI@home Task 23mr10ad.3506.14965.13.10.241_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 13.06.2010 20:49:03 SETI@home If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. It's not really new (I've seen it a lot of months ago) but in two hosts of mine I see it now. Hosts are http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1852935 http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=5381180 |
|
52)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
How to reschedule VLARs?
(Message 1003556)
Posted 1078 days ago by Francesco Forti
So I revert to the previuos Lunatic app. I must correct myself. The message apears (after a while) on the older lunatic app too. But not in all host. It is random. I will follow the other threads to understand why FF |
|
53)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
How to reschedule VLARs?
(Message 1003522)
Posted 1078 days ago by Francesco Forti
It was http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=1852935 Sorry, I say "it was" because before reading your post I have seen that there is a new lunatic's version so I have installed it. I was using Lunatics_Win32v0.2_AP505r168_AKv8b_CudaV12 and now I have installed Lunatics_Win32v0.36_AP505r409_AKv8b_Cuda When I have restard BOINC ... I haver lost all 528 and got this message: Your app_info.xml file doesn't have a usable version of SETI@home Enhanced No work for CPU and no work for GPU: Message from server: (reached daily quota of 100 tasks) So I revert to the previuos Lunatic app. The message about app_info disappered but I'm still without job (Message from server: Project has no jobs available) All other Hosts use 603 and 608 and I can run task and reschedule without problems. I get the 100 tasks message but I have a 8 days cache. So I can crunch for days. Bye, FF |
|
54)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
How to reschedule VLARs?
(Message 1002848)
Posted 1079 days ago by Francesco Forti
Reschedule works fine with 6.03 (CPU) and 6.08 (GPU) but can't handle 5.28 In one Host I have them and I have recently installed a CUDA device. If I run Reschedule, I see 0 CPU task, even if I have more than 500. How can get 603 instead of 528 without loosing cache? FF |
|
55)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Message from server: (reached daily quota of 100 tasks)
(Message 1002844)
Posted 1079 days ago by Francesco Forti
Previously was "Anonymous platform" Then "Not in DB" Now I see 1) Anonymous platform - NVIDIA GPU 2) Anonymous platform - CPU Bye FF |
|
56)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Pending units
(Message 999285)
Posted 1093 days ago by Francesco Forti
I see first signals of decrease in the pending. RAC is growing UP. Bye, Franz |
|
57)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Pending units
(Message 998404)
Posted 1097 days ago by Francesco Forti
Yeah, I forgot about all those "This looks interesting, I think I install this" types. Not only. There are a lot af partecipants leaving the project, week after week. http://www.teamocuk.co.uk/cprojectpart2.php?p=SAH Global RAC is not growing and leaving of partecipants grows in the same days of tecnical problems. http://www.teamocuk.co.uk/cprojectcred2.php?p=SAH But it's very strange that the same workunit meets 3 times users leaving the project. FF |
|
58)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Pending units
(Message 998250)
Posted 1098 days ago by Francesco Forti
Here is my oldest "pending". http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=550560883 As you can see, it is a GPU task. I have completed it the same day (2 Jan 2010) Other cruncers give 1 Error while computing and 2 Timed out - no response An other one in in progress, since 18 april and I suppose a new Time Out in 3 days. Same story for second oldest http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=551136063 I think that the problem can be investigated starting from the situation of the other cruncher in the same workunit. FF |
|
59)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Pending units
(Message 997131)
Posted 1102 days ago by Francesco Forti
By the way: I see Update: Results out in the field 6,086,264 Results returned and awaiting validation 6,824,424 --- So ... Out in the field now are less (now 6,086,264 was 6,284,723) and Returned and waiting are more (now 6,824,424 was 6,043,837) My "production" (let us call it so) is alwasy the same but pending is growing. Bye Franz |
|
60)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Pending units
(Message 996190)
Posted 1107 days ago by Francesco Forti
Ok, I have seen now that you are right. After 1 hour the task was reassigned to a new user. http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=610657396
Ok, clear! But why it's so high? Weeks ago it wasn't so. Francesco |
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |