Posts by Kenn Hutchins |
![]() |
| log in |
|
1)
Message boards :
Technical News :
from now (Oct 28, 2010) until "new server time"
(Message 1046050)
Posted 927 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
Surprise surprise, forgive me Jim Nabors! Downloading workunits as I type. |
|
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
This computer has reached a limit on tasks in progress??
(Message 1011369)
Posted 1051 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
A question and change of subject (not a sanctioned diversion) ;-) I have just noticed the following on my account and wonder what the problem may be in downloading this element. Sat Jul 3 09:48:52 2010 SETI@home Backing off 3 hr 18 min 37 sec on download of astropulse_5.05_i686-apple-darwin My client has been trying to download this for some time, and I have not pursuing the issue due to the work limit issue that is preoccupying us. Any ideas? |
|
3)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Staycation (Jul 01 2010)
(Message 1011008)
Posted 1052 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
I as well have only two days of work available. Fri Jul 2 14:23:40 2010 SETI@home Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks Fri Jul 2 14:23:40 2010 SETI@home Message from server: No work sent Fri Jul 2 14:23:40 2010 SETI@home Message from server: This computer has reached a limit on tasks in progress This is the message sent on reboot. So my question is: If this is going to be the case, that only two days of tasks can be downloaded, then there will be less work done, as the computer serving SETI will have days where there is no work available, due to a limit set by the server as copied above. This especially so, when there are three days or more of SETI server shut down. I understand the need for more maintenance time (with a later deadline to do the work). But, if work available limits disables SETI work for three days a week, there will be far less work done for the project. I do believe the object is not to lessen the work done for SETI, but rather, to ease the workload deadline for the Berkley staff (Matt, Jeff et al). So limiting the work available for download to each SETI client detracts from the overall efficiency for the SETI project, thus negating some of the effect of longer server shutdown for maintenance. I do appreciate the work done at Berkley by Matt, Jeff et al. |
|
4)
Message boards :
Team Recruitment Center :
NEW TEAM ACTIVATED- L'ESTRIE, EASTERN TOWNSHIPS
(Message 991444)
Posted 1122 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
Hello, Bonjour. Il y a maintenant une équipe pour ceux de nous qui habitent ou ont habité dans l'Estrie du Québec - bienvenue à bord. There is now a team for those of us who live or have lived in the EasternTownships of Quebec - Welcome Aboard. |
|
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
iMac 21.5 with ATI Radeon HD 4670 GPU
(Message 950677)
Posted 1268 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
I am getting a message that no usable GPU found. Is there going to be an upgrade so that Mac ATI GPUs can crunch? Thanks |
|
6)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Mac Knifed (Jul 22 2008)
(Message 796892)
Posted 1741 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
I´ve been unable to get new workunits. (2008-08-12) The problem is universal due to the server problems this past weekend. Work units will be slowly created to ease loads, until the deluge of delayed work units that are being currently uploaded are validated. So one has to be patient. Kenn |
|
7)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Calm a Llama Down (Feb 13 2008)
(Message 712768)
Posted 1921 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
Message 712612 The above URL explains the probable cause of my problems. Kenn |
|
8)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Calm a Llama Down (Feb 13 2008)
(Message 712589)
Posted 1921 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
I am now running properly. I uninstalled and reinstalled (after having tried reset unsuccessfully). Everything seems to be operating properly now. I had an update for my operating system, and that is the only thing that I can think of that may have fubarred the works. That update, though, did not affect any other programmes. Kenn |
|
9)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Calm a Llama Down (Feb 13 2008)
(Message 712334)
Posted 1922 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
SETI@home Wed 13 Feb 1943:09 2008 Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 283755 seconds of work, reporting 98 completed tasks SETI@home Wed 13 Feb 19:43:14 2008 Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks SETI@home Wed 13 Feb 19:43:14 2008 Message from server: No work sent SETI@home Wed 13 Feb 19:43:14 2008 Message from server: (reached daily quota of 2 results) What does that mean? I have my boinc manager set to retain three days of work. Kenn |
|
10)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Un Chien D'espace (Nov 15 2007)
(Message 681254)
Posted 2008 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
The french noun 'espace' is feminine as in space - the cosmos. In these references the noun 'espace' retains its gender no matter the gender of the noun preceding 'espace'. In the following case the noun 'espace' is masculine: I need more space -> je manque d'espace. Even here the inherent difference of language is shown -> the literal translation from the french je manque d'espace is I miss the space, although to a francophone that would not be the case. As is the case with many languages nouns that act as adjectives retain their properties or in some cases the words are combined into longer singular words, thus eliminating the original intent of the definitions. The literal translation of un chien de l'espace would be a dog of the space. If one wanted a definite article as per: the space dog -> le chien de l'espace would be the translation. Kenn [/quote] Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't "chien" and "chaton" both male nouns? So "a space dog" would be "un chien d'espace" and "space cats" would be "chatons d'espace"?[/quote] |
|
11)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Un Chien D'espace (Nov 15 2007)
(Message 680924)
Posted 2009 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
In fact "un chien d'espace" should read "un chien de l'espace". Kenn What would French be for space kitties? |
|
12)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Weekend server problems (Oct 1, 2007)
(Message 652752)
Posted 2057 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
I have two MacIntosh SE machines (with hard drives). I just plugged them in and they booted up. Bound to be better then a Microsoft Server (dontcha think?). Kenn There’s got to be time for humour!!!!!!! PS I really do have two operational MacIntosh Se machines. With all these troubles, would switching to Microsoft Server help any? |
|
13)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Ups and Downs (Sep 04 2007)
(Message 634627)
Posted 2083 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
A thank you for all those who responded. Kenn aka The Reinman There is a variable called "duration correction factor" that keeps track of the predicted vs. actual processing time on work units. |
|
14)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Ups and Downs (Sep 04 2007)
(Message 634187)
Posted 2083 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
I have getting Work Units all along (lucky I guess), but I have noticed that when downloaded they have overly long 'to completion' times. It has varied from 35 hours up to 65 hours. Although in most cases the work is done is less then ten percent of that listed to completion time. One can see the time to completion tick off much more quickly then the CPU running time for that particular work unit (ratio of a minute to three seconds of CPU time) . This obviously reduces the number of work units downloaded when a cache of work is requested in preferences to 'maintain enough work for an additional' time. So my question is fourfold. Is this done intentionally to reduce the stress on the servers? Is this an error created by the server thus fooling it into not producing as many work units? Is this something that has slipped by the staff and can be corrected, thus making the servers more efficient and to stop the unwarranted blathering of some few volunteer computer owners? Is this unique to my computer or my type of my computer? I am using the latest application, and am in possession of iMac Core 2 Duo. Kenn |
|
15)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Into the Long Weekend (Aug 31 2007)
(Message 633795)
Posted 2084 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
Ned: Nor did I run out of work either over the past long weekend. My pending credit also shrank today by a considerable margin. Kenn
|
|
16)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Into the Long Weekend (Aug 31 2007)
(Message 633254)
Posted 2085 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
Both computers are using the lastest apps. The ever increasing pending credit is on the newest computer - Core 2 Duo. The G4 is happily munching away, albeit at a slower rate. KENN Has anyone else had there pending credit increase dramatically. |
|
17)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Into the Long Weekend (Aug 31 2007)
(Message 632688)
Posted 2086 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
Has anyone else had there pending credit increase dramatically. Mine used to hover around 1800 to 2100. I am now at 7200 pending credits. It never has been so high a value. Kenn |
|
18)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Subversion (Aug 30 2007)
(Message 630304)
Posted 2088 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
Thanks for your efforts with the resources that you have available to you Matt. Kenn Here we go again! Another long week end and again NO WORK FROM SETI. So again I have 2 computers left of sucking up electric and wearing out hard drives and fans for nothing.... Hey SETI what's up with no work for my system to crunch??? |
|
19)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
v5.27 (MB) live on main.
(Message 624521)
Posted 2097 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
Here are the new Alex Kan Seti Apple (Mac) Enhanced nographics versions 7.2. I take it that the mb in the version name means multibeam? I do not know if they process multibeam or not but these were made available the 21 and 22 of August 2007, as indicated at Alex's download site. Anybody else know. At a quick glance when I installed it and reinstalled Boinc 5.10.7 it appeared that Seti resent the 'lost results' which I believe were multibeam. http://tbp.berkeley.edu/~alexkan/set...nographics.zip core duo http://tbp.berkeley.edu/~alexkan/set...nographics.zip core 2 http://tbp.berkeley.edu/~alexkan/set...nographics.zip G4 http://tbp.berkeley.edu/~alexkan/set...nographics.zip G5 Kenn |
|
20)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Hooray? (Aug 08 2007)
(Message 617476)
Posted 2110 days ago by Kenn Hutchins
Grazie, obrigado, danke, tak, merçi, thanks. Kenn So, and this is perhaps a question to which I should know the answer. |
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |