21)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc officially DOS'd my network
(Message 225537)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: I like normal mode and error mode. Please answer relevant question and not continue off topic. People at boinc don't like the truth. If the truth offends somebody let's call it something else. So How do you cause only one computer to communicate with main servers and not cause DOS? |
22)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc officially DOS'd my network
(Message 225532)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: An apology would be nice. Maybe a little help would be even nicer. I guess no one is adult enough to apologize and I guess no one is expert enough to help with minor Boinc settings. |
23)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Earliest Deadline First
(Message 225529)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: OK, one more time. So let's just pick any old algorithm and who cares if what it says is correct or not. It is bad style to not be able to work in a standard operating mode. Everything that Boinc is supposed to aid is broken because everyone has to be held to a little rule you made up for dial up. There should be a cache setting. There should be a connect rate. WHEN MY COMPUTER IS NOT OVERCOMMITTED IT SHOULDN'T SAY SO. I WANT THREE DAYS OR WHATEVER I SET WORTH OF WORK ON COMPUTER ANd ONLY THAT AMOUNT. I DON'T WANT A RANDOM SET OF WORK UNITS AT ANY GIVEN TIME. I SHOULD KNOW OR PREDICT WHAT THE SCHEDULER IS GOING TO DO FOR ANY DATE IN FUTURE. |
24)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc officially DOS'd my network
(Message 225519)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: An apology would be nice. Maybe a little help would be even nicer. |
25)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc officially DOS'd my network
(Message 225514)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: Can any of these hatefull people focus on the correct thing and not attack from weeks or months ago. |
26)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc officially DOS'd my network
(Message 225508)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post:
I like normal mode and error mode. but that is not what this thread is for. Do you know how I can make it so only one computer caches work units for other computers and then that one computer returns the results. I guess the other question is why Boinc is not working correctly when trying to upload all the results at once. It goes only two deep the first two upload and go past 100% and then the next one starts while the other ones are still going. |
27)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc officially DOS'd my network
(Message 225506)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: Oh I guess it might be broke. You want me to send you a jpg of an entire list of workunits uploading at once. They still are there when I had to suspend network access. Who is the troll around here. You can't say anything constructive. I already said I have a US Robotic 8514. It has 4 hardwire 100Mbit connections and the wireless can connect at 125Mbit/s. All the results were connecting at once. DSL connects at 1.5Mb. It is also supposed to stop at 100% upload too I suppose. All of them were uploading else it wouldn't have had the result. Talk about people who make things fit their own world. |
28)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Is it time for Seti Enhanced?
(Message 225498)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: is there any free C/C++ compiler that can compile the source code? I don't think setienhanced will stave off user overload too long. Computers are still getting faster and they did this a little bit before. They added more calculations. |
29)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc officially DOS'd my network
(Message 225494)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: All it would take is a couple lines of code in short run to fix things. If(dialup_connection) Oh I guess it might be broke. You want me to send you a jpg of an entire list of workunits uploading at once. They still are there when I had to suspend network access. Who is the troll around here. You can't say anything constructive. I already said I have a US Robotic 8514. It has 4 hardwire 100Mbit connections and the wireless can connect at 125Mbit/s. All the results were connecting at once. DSL connects at 1.5Mb. |
30)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc officially DOS'd my network
(Message 225483)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: yada...yada...yada...You are too happy to support substandard program. yada...yada....yada.... Short term fix put switch for dial up user. If not dial up don't do twice connect rate. Hey I bet you $50 that there won't be an overcommitted warning or need for EDF. Whoops that internet gambling thing. Probably contributing to the deliquency of minor. Maybe you want to continue this in correct thread. Causing a DOS condition isn't the sign of a very robust program. |
31)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Earliest Deadline First
(Message 225476)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: I see that somewhere between Dec 10th and Dec 13th you switched your Pentium M to crunch3rs stuff. you should have by now done enough so that the DCF would be close to accurate. This should have allowed you to download more work than you were accustomed to. I have in the past "suspended" a project that had work, and the next project then refilled my cache, and then I unsuspended my original project. I was then all set with 2x my cache. I got them done but it was close. did this sort of thing happen? So Boinc doesn't like Pentium M's? |
32)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc officially DOS'd my network
(Message 225471)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: All it would take is a couple lines of code in short run to fix things. If(dialup_connection) I didnt break anything. What part of attaching to project was incorrect? What part of Boinc managers not being able to connect on same network is my fault. What did I do wrong when I just connected and let the manager run until I could no longer access internet. What part of anything you said has anything to do with saying anything usefull. I have been running boinc for a couple years. You are too happy to support substandard program. All I have been doing is install connect and let it run. |
33)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Earliest Deadline First
(Message 225461)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: Why does General Motor put a "check engine" light indicator on the dash, by golly, they should put one light for each condition "check PFE sensor", "check oil pressure", "check air filter", "EGR valve not opening", etc etc I hate to tell you, but The Ford Windstar warnings are check oil, Time to replace filter. Its funny even with my Chevy Astro you can get the people at Autozone to hook up a little device and it tells you exactly where it is failing. There has been less oxygen sensor errors recently in newer cars because the computer automatically adjust the carberator so there is no excess oxygen for sensor to activate on. |
34)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Earliest Deadline First
(Message 225456)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: Yes, the proper use of terms is important. So let's make sure EVERYONE quits using the term "work unit" when it's really "result". If they are results why are we working on them, we already have results. results are work answered. |
35)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Earliest Deadline First
(Message 225448)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: ksnash, how about just rereading the thread P@H has taken over my machine, or Can we please have control of what runs and when in which we already determined that the scheduler was doing what you set in your preferences. According to "Boincstats" you have done 56.2% CPDN, 22.8% Einstein and 20.9% seti. Everything you said is useless. You keep saying it works correctly. When what it says is wrong. It is so nice you like to support substandard software. |
36)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc officially DOS'd my network
(Message 225446)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: ksnash, how about just rereading the thread P@H has taken over my machine, or Can we please have control of what runs and when in which we already determined that the scheduler was doing what you set in your preferences. According to "Boincstats" you have done 56.2% CPDN, 22.8% Einstein and 20.9% seti. Ths thread has nothing to do with that subject. I just connected to setiathome on my other computers and I can't seem to upload correctly. The communication stayed in upload mode and Boinc software caused me to lose the ability to communicate out of my network. I had to turn off network access so My dsl connection was open again. It seems to bea problem with server side. |
37)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc officially DOS'd my network
(Message 225441)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: All it would take is a couple lines of code in short run to fix things. If(dialup_connection) { twice connect code } |
38)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc officially DOS'd my network
(Message 225439)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: ksnash, how about just rereading the thread P@H has taken over my machine, or Can we please have control of what runs and when in which we already determined that the scheduler was doing what you set in your preferences. According to "Boincstats" you have done 56.2% CPDN, 22.8% Einstein and 20.9% seti. Does it or does it not say something that is WRONG. The computer is overcommitted. It is not. How about if UPS or FedEX uses your logic. They can just use a bat to move your packages. Your packages get to where they are going. Who cares there is a correct way that could be implemented, Your packages go to their destination. |
39)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc officially DOS'd my network
(Message 225427)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post: I had to dump two weeks of wu's and was losing my network recently because I just let the Boinc manager run. |
40)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Boinc officially DOS'd my network
(Message 225426)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by ksnash Post:
What occurrs in my statistics is not because of the scheduler, it is in spite of it. This is an open source project and people are supposed to mention what is incorrect. Your only response is it is too difficut to have a decent scheduler. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.