Posts by SciManStev


log in
1) Message boards : Number crunching : definition: radiator (Message 1583206)
Posted 18 days ago by Profile SciManStevProject donor
I use two of these radiators. One for each GPU.

http://www.frozencpu.com/products/23919/ex-rad-707/Black_Ice_Nemesis_GTX_560_Radiator_-_Black.html?tl=c95s1148b215

I use an aquarium chiller for my CPU.
Liquid all the way!

Steve
2) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : NASA confirms ‘impossible’ thruster actually works, could revolutionize space travel (Message 1582202)
Posted 20 days ago by Profile SciManStevProject donor
I don't know if this has been mentioned in another thread, but I stumbled onto it, and found it interesting.

http://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/nasa-confirms-impossible-space-drive-actually-works-revolutionize-space-travel/?utm_source=o1&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=o1

Steve
3) Message boards : Number crunching : Win7 ate 9 & spit out 10! (Message 1580470)
Posted 24 days ago by Profile SciManStevProject donor
What I just heard, is that the reason they are using Windows 10, instead of Windows 9, is that older programs that were Windows 95, 98 compatible looked for Windows 9x, and if they saw it, they would install. They had to jump numbers to prevent that from happening.

Steve

That would be a weird installer. Most use the OS version to determine the OS for installation. With Windows 7 being v6.1 & Windows ME being v4.90.

I could be wrong. The IT pro at my company told me that.

Steve
4) Message boards : Number crunching : Win7 ate 9 & spit out 10! (Message 1580464)
Posted 24 days ago by Profile SciManStevProject donor
What I just heard, is that the reason they are using Windows 10, instead of Windows 9, is that older programs that were Windows 95, 98 compatible looked for Windows 9x, and if they saw it, they would install. They had to jump numbers to prevent that from happening.

Steve
5) Message boards : Cafe SETI : is it a hoax? (Message 1577020)
Posted 24 Sep 2014 by Profile SciManStevProject donor
She should have had the extra breast installed on her back.
Yeah, it would look funny but she'd be fun to dance with.

I read this at work, and burst out laughing!
People were wondering what was so funny.

Steve
6) Message boards : Cafe SETI : Scenery (Message 1571888)
Posted 14 Sep 2014 by Profile SciManStevProject donor
From the top of Mount Washington, New Hampshire.



Steve
7) Message boards : Cafe SETI : Scenery (Message 1571109)
Posted 12 Sep 2014 by Profile SciManStevProject donor
From the top of Cannon mountain, after riding the tram with Bernie during his visit last year.



Steve
8) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Time Travel (Message 1568718)
Posted 7 Sep 2014 by Profile SciManStevProject donor
The way I see it, you need time to describe the position of an object. You can move the object through a Cartesian plane, and it changes coordinates. The thing is that by changing the coordinates of an object, it is still where it was, at a specified time. Time moves in one direction, but is still required to determine exactly where an object is in space.

An example is that the dinosaurs existed 65 million years ago, and they still exist at that time. If you had a big enough telescope, and could travel 65 million light years away, you could theoretically observe the dinosaurs going about their daily lives.

Steve
9) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Time Travel (Message 1567329)
Posted 5 Sep 2014 by Profile SciManStevProject donor
Time travel in the forward direction is possible and most likely inevitable for long distance high speed space travellers. But I doubt that anyone will ever invent a machine that you can step into, push a button, and seconds later step out into a different time, either forward or backward.

I totally agree!

Steve
10) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Time Travel (Message 1566993)
Posted 4 Sep 2014 by Profile SciManStevProject donor
I understand your skepticism, and I share it.
Here is the embedded link explaining a little bit.
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/140619/ncomms5145/full/ncomms5145.html

Nature Communications owns Scientific American, so this is a bit more reputable source.

All they did is use current knowledge of quantum mechanics to work some equations.
Mathematical evidence is certainly not conclusive, but it is more than there was. I personally don't think we will ever have a mechanism to travel back in time, even for an elementary particle, but I will look at evidence. If they can back it up with experimental proof, then I would be more open to the idea, once I understand the mechanism. Without experimental proof, it is just numbers.

Steve
11) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Time Travel (Message 1566950)
Posted 4 Sep 2014 by Profile SciManStevProject donor
In the article, there is no need for faster than light travel, and they have only theorized about it at the photon level. I am quite skeptical, but am willing to look at evidence whether it agrees with my current understanding or not.

After learning that something actually lived on the surface of the space station for some time, caused me to re-think my position on life traveling on comets or asteroids, instead of just the building blocks. I still think it is more likely the building blocks could be transported over millions of years, rather than life itself, but now I think there might be a possibility that some form of life could survive millions of years in a space environment.

As to time travel, the math is working at a very small scale, but like M-theory, nothing experimental has been done to confirm it.

Steve
12) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Time Travel (Message 1566936)
Posted 4 Sep 2014 by Profile SciManStevProject donor
I am not sure what to make of this, but it is interesting.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/03/grandfather-paradox-resolved-simulation_n_5758148.html?ir=Science

Steve
13) Message boards : Number crunching : AMD and PSU's (Message 1562177)
Posted 25 Aug 2014 by Profile SciManStevProject donor
FalconFly i agree the PSU's i have been using should be enough but there simply not and i can't understand why this is happening even if they only produce 60% of there power it should be enough but it's not .

I have always used Intel and i tell you what if the next PSU fails within a month i'm going to trash this piece of crap and go back to intel and never never use AMD again

The fact that the same PSU used in a Intel q8400 shows the 12 volt at 12.55 at idle and the AMD says 12.3 tells me there is no PSU that will work with this chip at full load and nobody has explained why the voltage is different i suspect it's using a higher voltage to start off with and there is the main problem unless you can explain the difference i can see me trashing this chip and board .

I have ask AMD the same question in a email i just sent to them if they say what your saying i'm gona get real peed off with them

Was the old PSU a single rail?
Wattage is really a secondary consideration, as I have seen 1250 watt PSU, that had multiple 12 Volt rails. The problem with that, is that a CPU or GPU combination can use up all the current for a given rail, while being no where near the wattage limit for the supply.

I use a Corsair AX1200 supply with a single 100.4 amp rail, and ran a heavy load of 975 watts on it for years. It may be getting tired now, but the key was single rail. they have a new Corsair AX1500i that has a single 125 Amp rail.

Wattage is important, but make sure you have all the needed current on your rail, and it won't matter if the CPU is Intel or AMD. If GPU's are loading down the PSU, the CPU will sense it quickly, and possibly crash. A single rail system makes that very unlikely.

Steve
14) Message boards : Number crunching : AMD and PSU's (Message 1562024)
Posted 25 Aug 2014 by Profile SciManStevProject donor
Just stick to 1 that only has one beefy 12V rail in it, leave the dual/multi-rail 1's alone.

Cheers.

This is very good advice. Single rail PSU's are the way to go.

Steve
15) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Stardust Team Reports Discovery of First Potential Interstellar Space Particles (Message 1557062)
Posted 14 Aug 2014 by Profile SciManStevProject donor
Very cool Lynn! That was very interesting.
Thank you for posting that.

Steve
16) Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Black Holes part 2 (Message 1556175)
Posted 13 Aug 2014 by Profile SciManStevProject donor
http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/12/tech/black-hole-nasa-nustar/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

Steve
17) Message boards : SETI@home Science : Wildfires In Northern California Threaten The Search For Alien Life (Message 1552649)
Posted 5 Aug 2014 by Profile SciManStevProject donor
http://www.popsci.com/article/science/wildfires-northern-california-threaten-search-alien-life?src=SOC&dom=fb

Steve
18) Message boards : Politics : First Scientific Proof Of God Found (Message 1546519)
Posted 23 Jul 2014 by Profile SciManStevProject donor
OK. Let me be a bit more direct. By understanding how the Bible got here and why, what it says, and how it contradicts itself, it makes decoding human DNA from such a questionable source, impossible except in your own mind.

Steve
19) Message boards : Politics : First Scientific Proof Of God Found (Message 1546505)
Posted 23 Jul 2014 by Profile SciManStevProject donor
you need one of the hand-written originals


As I pointed out by linking you to Bart Ehrman's research, there are no original texts. Only copies of copies, and they were changing constantly.

I know you only looked at two minutes of each video, so you didn't get the evidence. This is true for both the old and new testaments. Bart looked at the oldest texts in existence, then the newer ones to develop a time line of what was added and when. Many times he can even explain why.

The Old Testament had at least 40 different authors, and was written over 1600 years. The new testament had thousands of authors, and evolved as church leaders tried to explain the inconsistencies and differences. It didn't even become a Bible until about 300 years after the time Jesus was alive.

There was so much evidence you passed up, because you only saw two minutes of each video, and decided you didn't like what you heard.

Steve
20) Message boards : Politics : First Scientific Proof Of God Found (Message 1545063)
Posted 20 Jul 2014 by Profile SciManStevProject donor
I have my money on Bart Ehrman. He has done the research, and isn't teaching theology, but history.

What you claim as your research is the biggest pile of nonsense I have ever read.

That is my opinion.

Steve


Next 20

Copyright © 2014 University of California