Posts by Gary Charpentier

IMV, before governments chase up business's & individuals for tax evasion/avoidance, they should first clean up their own departments....

Embarrassment for the Government

I think that is an unfair view, although albeit a correct one. It isn't the Government departments that need "cleaning up" per se, they aren't avoiding taxes, it is their contractors. What needs tightening up is the procedures for vetting contractors. From first hand knowledge I know the depth of the financial checks made on Government contractors to ensure financial viability during the course of any contract, therefore I am surprised that this slipped through the net.

Are you on a retainer from Fox?

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

my machine logged a dozen attempts from an IP in China to log on.

90% of the worlds hacking comes from there. That country is more of a threat to the Western world than Russia ever was duing[sic] the cold war.

Now just Why did he go to Hong Kong?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/06/14/china-newspaper-says-snowden-could-be-useful-to-china/
I think I smell a wumpus.

Really?

Gary your cynicism is showing. I tend to be more open minded, occasionally I learn new things.

Never presuppose what I am going to do in the next 24 hours.

Hmmmmm. I was sure that someone would comment about why people always want what someone else has even if it is the exact same thing. I guess I was wrong.

I also have a feeling that supporters of such theories tend to only use data that supports the theory they are trying to simulate.

Haven't seen anyone in here lately say the government needs to spend more.

I recall the girls playing beach volleyball in your Olympic Stadium

Really, well done. Seeing as it was in Horseguards Parade in central London.

2012 Beach Volleyball

... just random words that are links to who knows what...

So indeed, you are just playing word games and trolling with no interest in reality.

Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.

You seem to repeat this maxim ad nauseum.
Almost like Nancy Reagan's "Just say no".

You proffer a so called superior understanding yet offer nothing of substance other than pedantry.

All unnecessary. We have the numbers in that we are directly measuring what is in the atmosphere and by the beauty or radio-isotope analysis, we can directly measure where the CO2 in the atmosphere has come from.

How clearer can you get?:

... the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is going up by 15 billion tons a year, and humans are emitting 30 billion tons a year. So nature's net balance must be an absorption of 15 billion tons a year from the air...