Dedicated Computer

Questions and Answers : Windows : Dedicated Computer
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Profile jmadden_98

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 01
Posts: 1
Credit: 536,248
RAC: 1,609
United States
Message 1913236 - Posted: 15 Jan 2018, 19:38:37 UTC

If we have a computer with it's sole purpose to run Seti is the Boinc program the best one? Years ago I remember they had different programs that would run in the background (sans screensaver) and were a lot faster.
So if I don't care about the screensaver what is the best way to use my computer?
ID: 1913236 · Report as offensive
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 17023
Credit: 370,930,118
RAC: 289,272
United Kingdom
Message 1913243 - Posted: 15 Jan 2018, 20:06:15 UTC
Last modified: 15 Jan 2018, 20:06:24 UTC

It all depends on what the computer has for brains.
A basic CPU only installation will run quite well, just turn off the screensaver and it will be better.
If you've got a "half decent" GPU then that will be far better than the CPU on its own.
The next step up is to run the "optimised" applications - these days there is a user friendly "installer" that will do most of the hard work of installing and basic configuring for you.
From there on its join us "nutters" in "Number Crunching" and tune the optimised installation to get to some quite heady heights.

I would do one step at a time, get it working on the "stock" applications, just turning off the screen saver, then move on one step at a time - that way if anything goes wrong you only have to look back one step not stand there trying to work out where what and when is mass of confusion....
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 1913243 · Report as offensive

Questions and Answers : Windows : Dedicated Computer

©2019 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.