Until they become a positive force and not an hysterical accusing mob. They will not be considered an alternative to Trump.

So you are agreeing that there is no viable alternative until 2020 at least & maybe 2024, that's if the numpty in the White House hasn't started WWIII.

So I'll repeat what already has been said, what a sad state of affairs. Doesn't say much for the greatest country on the Earth does it.

I see that Trump is still carrying on like a 5yr old who's had his lollipop taken away for being bad boy over that book. ROFLMFAO!!!

If he's the best that yous can come up with then there's no hope for the U.S. of A.

Cheers.

So you are agreeing that there is no viable alternative until 2020 at least & maybe 2024, that's if the numpty in the White House hasn't started WWIII.

.....until 2020? Are you seriously suggesting impeachment or insurrection? Those are the alternatives and neither have been successfully achieved since we rejected King George.

And talk of invoking the 25th Amendment is laughable.

As to Michael Wolff's imaginative tome, it will be discredited (and is already being so by none other than 'Sloppy Steve Bannon', one of the 'alleged' contributors), and relegated to it's appropriate place in history right along side 'Wot Hoppend?'(by Hill-LIARy)......now that's something to ROTFALYAO over........revisionist history is extremely entertaining.

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

So you are agreeing that there is no viable alternative until 2020 at least & maybe 2024, that's if the numpty in the White House hasn't started WWIII.

.....until 2020? Are you seriously suggesting impeachment or insurrection? Those are the alternatives and neither have been successfully achieved since we rejected King George.

Don't know where you came up with that one. 2020 is the next presidential election is it not?

So you are agreeing that there is no viable alternative until 2020 at least & maybe 2024, that's if the numpty in the White House hasn't started WWIII.

.....until 2020? Are you seriously suggesting impeachment or insurrection? Those are the alternatives and neither have been successfully achieved since we rejected King George.

Don't know where you came up with that one. 2020 is the next presidential election is it not?

And your post of there being a possible....

viable alternative until 2020 at least & maybe 2024

....would seem to mean there is an 'alternative' other than the next Presidential Election cycle.

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

Is there actually a "Radical Left" of any significant size in the US?

Is there actually a "Radical Left" of any significant size in the US?

Yes in Clyde's mind.

---

The disconnect is occurring because you equate progressive with radical left. Methinks not, they are spelled differently. Nowhere have I found them to be synonyms.

---

Why is there any need to to ask about the "Radical Right" in the US, when they have been found all over the place for over 100 years.

They include those supporting any of the following groups, just to mention a few. They probably think the Tea Party is left wing.

Alt-Right
KKK
John Birch Society
McCarthyism

Do you need more help?

I asked about the US, not what has happened in the rest of the world.

Show me these "Radical Left" groups in the US, past or present, and their crimes against humanity.
Something like what the "Radical Right" KKK has done.

There is quite a difference between The Weather Underground and Bernie Sanders yet you equate them.
Weather Underground = radical left.
Bernie Sanders = very progressive

---

I seem to remember a person who asked "Are those Republicans or Democrats on the field" right before shooting Steve Scalese and others. I would say he was pretty extreme left.............and obviously just a 'non-violent' protestor in the mold of Antifa...............

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

I seem to remember a person who asked "Are those Republicans or Democrats on the field" right before shooting Steve Scalese and others. I would say he was pretty extreme left.............and obviously just a 'non-violent' protestor in the mold of Antifa...............

Hardly a movement.

---

So you are agreeing that there is no viable alternative until 2020 at least & maybe 2024, that's if the numpty in the White House hasn't started WWIII.

.....until 2020? Are you seriously suggesting impeachment or insurrection? Those are the alternatives and neither have been successfully achieved since we rejected King George.

Don't know where you came up with that one. 2020 is the next presidential election is it not?

And your post of there being a possible....

viable alternative until 2020 at least & maybe 2024

....would seem to mean there is an 'alternative' other than the next Presidential Election cycle.

Doing a Clyde special are we? Those comments were in reply to this which suggest to me at least, which Is why I wrote it:

Until they become a positive force and not an hysterical accusing mob. They will not be considered an alternative to Trump.

, that there is no alternative to Trump until one sees the candidate opposing him in 2020. The 2024 was mentioned as Clyde has already stated several times that there is a possiblity that Trump could win then as well.

I trust that clarifies my remarks clearly enough for you.

..........and obviously just a 'non-violent' protestor in the mold of Antifa...............

Missing a "not"? :^) I certainly don't agree with Antifa's methods but I don't know of them ever using firearms, or causing any deaths.

The Symbionese Liberation Army comes to mind as a violent radical U.S. left-wing movement that caused a few deaths and used firearms.

---

..........and obviously just a 'non-violent' protestor in the mold of Antifa...............

Missing a "not"? :^) I certainly don't agree with Antifa's methods but I don't know of them ever using firearms, or causing any deaths.

The Symbionese Liberation Army comes to mind as a violent radical U.S. left-wing movement that caused a few deaths and used firearms.

I hardly think a criminal gang with about 20 'members' could be considered as a significant political group.

I hardly think a criminal gang with about 20 'members' could be considered as a significant political group.

I hardly do either, but it's all we have. :^p

Contrast that with the Klan: "in 18 months ending in June 1867, there were 197 murders and 548 cases of aggravated assault."

Oh, I forgot the Black Panthers. They self-identified as "socialist", had a murder or two, and promoted firearm use. Still small potatoes.

---

ClydeNotClyde aka Mr. Dangerous said:

The Radical Left is even more psychopathic and evil than the Radical Right.

So TRUE. NO NEED to CITE or PROVE to WELL EDUCATED and EXPERIENCED Americans as Mr. Dangerous and I.

WE HAVE LIVED IT.

See ALL EVIL Hear ALL EVIL Listened to THEM Spake ALL EVIL Yap

---

May we All have a METAMORPHOSIS. REASON. GOoD JUDGEMENT and LOVE and ORDER!!!!!

So TRUE. NO NEED to CITE or PROVE...

Good summary right there.

---

Re: KKK

The continuation of their Political Power in the USA, until the 1960's. Was aided and abetted by the Democrat Party and FDR's New Deal Coalition.

Then in 64 they quit the democrats and backed Wallace. Over the next couple of decades they drifted into the Republican party where today they elected their man to POTUS.