The Universe

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : The Universe
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 4 · 5 · 6 · 7

Profile betreger Project Donor

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 7839
Credit: 18,729,566
RAC: 9,364
United States
Message 1921049 - Posted: 25 Feb 2018, 16:36:43 UTC - in response to Message 1920933.  

ID: 1921049 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2692
Credit: 1,939,788
RAC: 0
Message 1925764 - Posted: 22 Mar 2018, 10:49:59 UTC

Which next means that it becomes a summary, for that of a conclusion.
ID: 1925764 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 1995
Credit: 908,438
RAC: 450
Message 1931115 - Posted: 21 Apr 2018, 0:03:22 UTC

Wohoo, lost a better one here.
ID: 1931115 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile AndrewMarcio

Send message
Joined: 9 Oct 17
Posts: 501
Credit: 16,859
RAC: 32
Message 1932316 - Posted: 27 Apr 2018, 14:17:49 UTC

ID: 1932316 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2692
Credit: 1,939,788
RAC: 0
Message 1932516 - Posted: 28 Apr 2018, 15:16:10 UTC - in response to Message 1932316.  
Last modified: 28 Apr 2018, 15:16:58 UTC

Nice, Andrew!

With my large monitor, I am able to see the pixelation for that of resolution into individual stars here.

Valid word above, and next not sure, but it should at least be interpreted.

But that is next 1.7 billion out of somewhere between 100 and 200 billion in all, only for that of our home galaxy, the Milky Way.

Remember Cinderella and the seven dwarfs, and next perhaps not Barnard's star either, but making it different populations for both mass and age,
meaning stellar mass, and we have just such a distribution of both stars, and also star clusters, among other things.

If rather making it numbers from that of an Equation, also that the Drake equation could be a "Probabilistic equation", or argument, for that of estimating the number of
stars in the galaxy which could possess life.

But still the philosopher within myself as well, which could also be thinking in a different way, for that of also making other conclusions at times.

It could be shown that 0, zero, or perhaps nil, could be of no value or meaning at all, but next perhaps still a number.

Backtracking in such a way, you should not be able to make it just ourselves as humans, only because there also could be still stars, as well as also the single cell around.

Make it Religion, for next also a bit of science as well, and always the difference, but here again, that of sometimes making a couple of philosophical thoughts,
in order for the possible expectation of an answer.
ID: 1932516 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Peter Tanhks

Send message
Joined: 27 Aug 13
Posts: 1
Credit: 4,439
RAC: 1
Message 1935386 - Posted: 12 May 2018, 18:32:10 UTC - in response to Message 1898902.  

The Big Bang theory is wrong ! The expanding Universe theory is wrong.
This is my thought about the Universe:
The microwave background are photons that have been traveled in space billions and billions of years, many of the photons were absorbed by cold matter and re-radiate away many times, it became photons in much lower frequency.
Just like matter particles (example protons) travel high speed in space will radiate away part of its' energy and slow down a bit. Photons too while travel in space will radiate away part of its' energy and red-shifted. Photons always travel at light speed, it lost a bit energy by red-shift. The amount of energy radiated away is very small, but if accumulate over billions and billions of years it become observe-able as red shift of the photons. Many of the photons have been traveled in space for so long that it red-shifted to microwave frequency.

The space of our Universe is full of photons travel in light speed in all direction. You have all type of wave from radio wave(of lowest frequency) to gamma ray(of highest frequency). Photon regardless of which direction they are traveling, will finally (soon or later) travel toward a blackhole, because blackhole curve space and bend light beams.
Universe is infinite, some photons could travel in space for 10 billion years, 100 billion years or event 1000 billion years, some photons will be absorbed by cold matter in space and than re-radiated as photons in other frequency, but soon or later it will encounter a blackhole in it's path and directly toward a giant blackkhole.

When photons traveling toward a giant blackhole (located at the center of galaxy), the photons will gain energy but photons are always travel at light speed (am talking about vacuum space). The photons increase energy by blue shifted. A photon in microwave frequency could blue shifted to gamma ray frequency in this way. There is a limit on how high frequency it can increase. When the frequency of the photons is too high, energy reached a maximum value, (near blackhole's event horizon), Quantum fluctuation created pair of matter particles and antimatter particles according to Einstein equation E=MC^2, here E=energy of the photon, M=Mass of the matter created. The antimatter particles will fall into blackhole, while the matter particles will be slingshotted at very high speed and fill the interstellar space of the galaxy. All matter in the galaxies' spiral arms come into existent through this way.
An example of matter being slingshot from the spinning center is "Spinning fireworks". When you light-up this firework, it will produce a pattern similar to spiral galaxy.
But, off course, for spinning fireworks, all matter being slingshotted located at the center at the beginning. It die-out when all the the matter finish.
But for galaxies, the matter being slingshotted are continuously being created from energy (photons) according to Einstein equation E=MC^2. As long as there is energy(photons) supply to the center of galaxies, the matter will continuously being created and slingshotted.

Those slingshotted matter particles moving at very high speed and fill the interstellar space of the galaxies...over time will become protons and electrons and than hydrogen atoms, As time move on, hydrogen atoms attracted by gravitational force among themself will accumulate and form new Stars.
New Stars will go on their evolution.... supernovas spread the heavier elements into space, than planets forming from heavier elements.

Stars convert matter to energy (photons), Blackholes convert energy (photons) to matter. The famous Einstein equation E=MC^2 already stated that not only matter can be converted to energy, energy can also be converted back to matter. The particle accelerators experiment already show that energy can be converted back to matter. The particle accelerators can create a condition that mimic the condition of Blackholes event horizon. Scientists have observed that under this condition, matters are being created from energy.

Universe always exited. Universe is infinite. An infinite universe will not contract (or collapse) by gravity force and thus there is no need to has a "cosmological constant".
ID: 1935386 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2692
Credit: 1,939,788
RAC: 0
Message 1935442 - Posted: 13 May 2018, 0:17:38 UTC
Last modified: 13 May 2018, 1:12:51 UTC

Trying again.

Your personal perspective, perhaps.

Oh, it ain't working for that of a given understanding, including the Laws of nature.

Or perhaps "Fundamental Laws of nature" for such a thing.

Let us keep up with the discussion, rather than hiding in the shadows, for what we actually know.

God said, and next also God made, for that of Creation, next also being possible.

So, infinity is perhaps a concept, if not any Construct either.

Hah, still a heaven filled with stars, except for no such thing as any Saints either.

Read my lips here, if not anyone else, and you next could think that there could be someone else around, only because of "Idiocy".

Oh, Bernie, those numbers you perhaps love, if perhaps not any users you could also well hate.

We always could know, if perhaps not tell that there could be "Nobody's Fools", for also that of horses,
and you next could make it a scientific debate, for perhaps also "Proof" as well.

Look, a Heaven filled with stars, at least for me, and I could be still looking at Creation as the subject.

But perhaps not any "belief" itself, or on its own either, because perhaps not any Religious belief either.

Shallow angle, if perhaps not any display either, because I am giving a thought of that of being delivered all the possibilities,
except for no such thing as going down the drain either.

Look, perhaps still in the Beginning, of sorts.

Is it not true that you could be picking up the pieces, both when that of Religion is concerned, and next also making it science?

Make it still science, and next also Religion for the "crooked".
ID: 1935442 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2692
Credit: 1,939,788
RAC: 0
Message 1935458 - Posted: 13 May 2018, 1:19:46 UTC
Last modified: 13 May 2018, 1:25:54 UTC

What if,

perhaps your regular day at work, and next also business scheme.

Here I am running BOINC, and next also 15 years with Seti@home.


Could I for that of bactracking, or backtracking purposes..

Serene, but but perhaps not God asking either.

Don't tell me about the "Laws" of nature, because next this is also supposed to be physical Laws. related, or perhaps pertaining, to the Universe.
ID: 1935458 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 4 · 5 · 6 · 7

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : The Universe

©2018 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.