Message boards :
Number crunching :
Broke 300,000 Credits/Day!!
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
elec999 Send message Joined: 24 Nov 02 Posts: 375 Credit: 416,969,548 RAC: 141 |
I feel so proud of myself! Finally broke 300,000 a milestone for me. |
Bill G Send message Joined: 1 Jun 01 Posts: 1282 Credit: 187,688,550 RAC: 182 |
Nice SETI@home classic workunits 4,019 SETI@home classic CPU time 34,348 hours |
Zalster Send message Joined: 27 May 99 Posts: 5517 Credit: 528,817,460 RAC: 242 |
Congratulations |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
That's a pretty significant achievement and puts you into the league of "heavy hitters" Congrats. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
Jim_S Send message Joined: 23 Feb 00 Posts: 4705 Credit: 64,560,357 RAC: 31 |
Congratulations!!! I Desire Peace and Justice, Jim Scott (Mod-Ret.) |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13736 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
Your E3-1230 with the GTX 1070. If you set the SBS value to 1024 you would almost double the output of the video card. Instead of 16min per BLC24 task, it would be closer to 7min 30s (check the run times of my GTX 1070s). -sbs 1024 Grant Darwin NT |
elec999 Send message Joined: 24 Nov 02 Posts: 375 Credit: 416,969,548 RAC: 141 |
Your E3-1230 with the GTX 1070. Do you mind to give me the complete line. Do my other GPUs looks good. Especially my 690s. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13736 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
Your E3-1230 with the GTX 1070. You only need to add it to your existing line, or replace the existing SBS value with 1024. Do my other GPUs looks good. Especially my 690s. Your 690's appear to be running without any command line values. If it's not you general use computer, use the same command line values as for the GTX 1070s (with the SBS 1024 value) and see how crunching times turn out. Since that system is running stock, the command line file has a different name. mb_cmdline-8.22_windows_intel__opencl_nvidia_SoG.txt is the stock application command line file in the Setiathome project data folder. Similar values for your GTX 980s would produce more work, if it's a dedicated cruncher. And your GTX 560Ti would produce a lot more work if you ran CUDA50 instead of 3.2. Even so, running SoG would probably result in even better output from it, particularly when processing GBT (Green Bank Telescope) work. EDIT- you also have some Xeon servers that support AVX. One probably has Lunatics installed on it, but not the AVX application. Another is running stock. If both of those were to run the AVX application, you could expect around a 30% or more boost in output. You'd just need to make sure you're installing the AVX application on the systems that can handle it as you have an older Xeon system there that doesn't support AVX. Grant Darwin NT |
elec999 Send message Joined: 24 Nov 02 Posts: 375 Credit: 416,969,548 RAC: 141 |
Does anyone have a full example of the mb_cmdline-8.22_windows_intel__opencl_nvidia_SoG.txt, do I simply add -sbs 1024 -spike_fft_thresh 4096 -tune 1 64 1 4 -oclfft_tune_gr 256 -oclfft_tune_lr 16 -oclfft_tune_wg 256 -oclfft_tune_ls 512 -oclfft_tune_bn 64 -oclfft_tune_cw 64 nothing else? |
Fox-Mulder71 Send message Joined: 16 Nov 12 Posts: 14 Credit: 2,740,999 RAC: 0 |
Hello, how many pc do you have running? |
tullio Send message Joined: 9 Apr 04 Posts: 8797 Credit: 2,930,782 RAC: 1 |
Three, a SUN WS of 2008 Vintage, running SuSE Linux Leap 42.2, a 2012 HP Laptop running Leap 42.3 and a HP Desktop from 2014 running Windows 10. All have AMD CPUs. The WS has a GTX 750 Ti GPU board, and the Windows PC a GTX 1050 Ti board. All run some BOINC projects 24/7. The LHC@home programs need VirtualBox 5.2.0. Tullio |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13736 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
Does anyone have a full example of the mb_cmdline-8.22_windows_intel__opencl_nvidia_SoG.txt, do I simply add -sbs 1024 -spike_fft_thresh 4096 -tune 1 64 1 4 -oclfft_tune_gr 256 -oclfft_tune_lr 16 -oclfft_tune_wg 256 -oclfft_tune_ls 512 -oclfft_tune_bn 64 -oclfft_tune_cw 64 Easiest to use the same values as for your GTX 1070s On my system I use -tt 1500 -hp -period_iterations_num 1 -high_perf -sbs 1024 -spike_fft_thresh 4096 -tune 1 64 1 4 -oclfft_tune_gr 256 -oclfft_tune_lr 16 -oclfft_tune_wg 256 -oclfft_tune_ls 512 -oclfft_tune_bn 64 -oclfft_tune_cw 64 which results in a level of lag I can live with. For a dedicated cruncher it wouldn't be an issue at all. If the lag is too much for your general use computer, bump up the value of -period_iterations_num to 3, 5, 7 10 etc till it works as you would like it to. Or reduce the value of tt to 1,000 or 750 or 500 till things work the way you want them to. Or use a combination of both. Grant Darwin NT |
elec999 Send message Joined: 24 Nov 02 Posts: 375 Credit: 416,969,548 RAC: 141 |
Thank you all for the feedback, I think I got most of it right. |
badaz907 Send message Joined: 8 Dec 03 Posts: 41 Credit: 873,780 RAC: 15 |
congradulations |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.