Now what!
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/925860866767163393

CHAIN MIGRATION must end now! Some people come in, and they bring their whole family with them, who can be truly evil. NOT ACCEPTABLE!

So now even families to a terrorist are also terrorists in the US according to Trump!

Likely to the third generation just like Kim.

What generation is 45?

Likely to the third generation just like Kim.

To the third generation?
Then Trump is in deep s**t!

Yes he is. Vile [potential] terrorist immigrants like him must be sent back to the country where they came from PDQ. MAGA!
Hey and once he is sent back all his spawn go too! 'Cause now daddy is gone they are generation 1! Wonderful! MAGA!

See to have a great Amerika only people whose ancestors were in the USA before 1776 can be allowed to remain! MAGA!

WOW, with this program fully operational we will throw out all the [insert racial slur(s)]! Not a single one left! MAGA!

Now if tRump implements this, Amerika will be great again!

Another one bites the dust.
Sam Clovis withdraws his nomination for USDA’s top scientist post after being linked to Russia probe

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s chief scientist nominee, Sam Clovis withdrew his name from consideration Wednesday amid revelations that he was among top officials on the Trump campaign who was aware of efforts by foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos to broker a relationship between the campaign and Russian officials.

Court documents unsealed Monday revealed that Papadopoulos pleaded guilty in early October to making false statement to FBI investigators about his contacts with foreigners claiming to have high-level Russian connections. In August 2016, Clovis encouraged Papadopoulos to organize an “off the record” meeting with Russian officials, according to court documents. “I would encourage you” and another foreign policy adviser to the campaign to “make the trip, if it is feasible,” Clovis wrote. The meeting did not ultimately take place.

In a letter to the president Wednesday, Clovis explained that he did not think he could get a fair consideration from the Senate, which was slated to hold a hearing on his appointment on Nov. 9.

He had no scientific qualifications anyway, so will no be missed.

Is this what America wants?

"Her views are reaching a wider public, too, thanks to American alt-right leaders such as Richard Spencer and Steve Bannon, former Trump chief strategist and chair of Breitbart News, who have taken up her account of history as a cyclical battle between good and evil."

Is this what America wants?

"Her views are reaching a wider public, too, thanks to American alt-right leaders such as Richard Spencer and Steve Bannon, former Trump chief strategist and chair of Breitbart News, who have taken up her account of history as a cyclical battle between good and evil."

That's what the xenophobic part wants.

---

Maybe but what is scary is that one got into the inner circle of power & if one can do it, so can others.

No doubt 45 is going to say this is "Fake News" if it is brought to his attention.
Washington Post-ABC poll: Most Americans approve of Trump-Russia probe, and nearly half think Trump committed a crime

aristocratic man = Anyone DEM/Lib/Progressive et al>>>Mirabeau = MADamme SCREECH-YOGA>>worm = Deplorables aka 45ers>>>enemy = Christian

Man O LIve, if Nietzsche could See His 'Superior' People Now. What dA HELL Happened Friedrich?!!!

**********************************************************************
When the resentment of the aristocratic man manifests itself, it fulfils and exhausts itself in an immediate reaction, and consequently instills no venom: on the other hand, it never manifests itself at all in countless instances, when in the case of the feeble and weak it would be inevitable. An inability to take seriously for any length of time their enemies, their disasters, their misdeeds— that is the sign of the full strong natures who possess a superfluity of moulding plastic force, that heals completely and produces forgetfulness: a good example of this in the modern world is Mirabeau, who had no memory for any insults and meannesses which were practised on him, and who was only incapable of forgiving because he forgot. Such a man indeed shakes off with a shrug many a worm which would have buried itself in another; it is only in characters like these that we see the possibility (supposing, of course, that there is such a possibility in the world) of the real "love of one's enemies." What respect for his enemies is found, forsooth, in an aristocratic man— and such a reverence is already a bridge to love! He insists on having his enemy to himself as his distinction. He tolerates no other enemy but a man in whose character there is nothing to despise and much to honour! On the other hand, imagine the "enemy" as the resentful man conceives him— and it is here exactly that we see his work, his creativeness; he has conceived "the evil enemy," the "evil one," and indeed that is the root idea from which he now evolves as a contrasting and corresponding figure a "good one," himself— his very self!

Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche. The Genealogy of Morals
***********************************************************************

A Bridge to Lovin' Yap

---

May we All have a METAMORPHOSIS. REASON. GOoD JUDGEMENT and LOVE and ORDER!!!!!

Can Trump restore the balance?

Interesting report

BUSTED: Evidence mounts that Jeff Sessions perjured himself under Al Franken questioning

Attorney General Jeff Sessions is suddenly facing an active dilemma.

A guilty plea signed last month by one of his former Trump campaign underlings revealed this week shows he likely perjured himself during his confirmation hearing — and he doesn’t have a good option to wriggle out of it.

Sessions told Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) at the January hearing that he was “not aware” of evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government during the campaign, according to the New Republic.

He walked back those claims last month during another Senate hearing, telling Franken he “conducted no improper discussions with Russians at any time regarding the campaign or any other item facing this country.”

But court filings, and a new CNN report, show he was aware of evidence that at least one campaign associate was in contact with Russia.

The witch hunt continues and the witches are closing in.
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/11/busted-evidence-mounts-that-jeff-sessions-perjured-himself-under-al-franken-questioning/

---

Now we know why Comey got canned, he had or would quickly have had the dirt.

And the 'hunters' will be burned with their own fires...........

In excerpts from "Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns that Put Donald Trump in the White House," published in Politico, Brazile writes the DNC was rigged in Clinton's favor because her campaign was largely financing the party early on in the presidential election.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/02/politics/donna-brazile-dnc-book/index.html So the Election WAS rigged, by the Dims, against one of their OWN candidates............only the Hilliary ill gotten gains kept the Dim party from Bankruptcy..........

This from the person who 'spoon fed' questions to Hilliary in a debate that she had revealed to her in advance.

Crib sheet 101.

I don't blame Bernie, with friends like the Dims no wonder he's an 'Independent'(yeah, like I believe that, just another 'Snake Oil Salesman').

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

Eye, everyone on the planet, except dyed in the wool 'pugnants, has known that the DEM primary was rigged*. How the hell do you think the election turned out as it did when 3/4 of the USA is democrat? The candidate they wanted wasn't running, most stayed home and didn't vote**. Wait and see what happens when a candidate they want is running. Oh wait, you have, FDR.


*They accept it; it is SOP.
**what was the turnout %?

Eye, everyone on the planet, except dyed in the wool 'pugnants, has known that the DEM primary was rigged*. How the hell do you think the election turned out as it did when 3/4 of the USA is democrat? The candidate they wanted wasn't running, most stayed home and didn't vote**. Wait and see what happens when a candidate they want is running. Oh wait, you have, FDR.


*They accept it; it is SOP.
**what was the turnout %?

Gary,

I think that both you and I are in agreement on at least one point... Trump is... well... doubleplusungood.

Yes, the Democrat party primaries are rigged. So are the Republican party primaries, though to a much lesser extent. The Democrats have their 'superdelegates' (the Republicans have something similar although much fewer).

After the 1968 Democratic National Convention, at which pro-Vietnam War liberal Hubert Humphrey was nominated for the presidency despite not running in a single primary election, the Democratic Party made changes in its delegate selection process to correct what was seen as "illusory" control of the nomination process by primary voters.[12] A commission headed by South Dakota Senator George McGovern and Minnesota Representative Donald M. Fraser met in 1969 and 1970 to make the composition of the Democratic Party's nominating convention less subject to control by party leaders and more responsive to the votes cast in primary elections.

The rules implemented by the McGovern-Fraser Commission shifted the balance of power to primary elections and caucuses, mandating that all delegates be chosen via mechanisms open to all party members.[12] As a result of this change the number of primaries more than doubled over the next three presidential election cycles, from 17 in 1968 to 35 in 1980.[12] Despite the radically increased level of primary participation, with 32 million voters taking part in the selection process by 1980, the Democrats proved largely unsuccessful at the ballot box, with the 1972 presidential campaign of McGovern and the 1980 re-election campaign of Jimmy Carter resulting in landslide defeats.[12] Democratic Party affiliation skidded from 41 percent of the electorate at the time of the McGovern-Fraser Commission report to just 31 percent in the aftermath of the 1980 electoral debacle.[12]

Further soul-searching took place among party leaders, who argued that the pendulum had swung too far in the direction of primary elections over insider decision-making, with one May 1981 California white paper declaring that the Democratic Party had "lost its leadership, collective vision and ties with the past," resulting in the nomination of unelectable candidates.[13] A new 70-member commission headed by Governor of North Carolina Jim Hunt was appointed to further refine the Democratic Party's nomination process, attempting to balance the wishes of rank-and-file Democrats with the collective wisdom of party leaders and to thereby avoid the nomination of insurgent candidates exemplified by the liberal McGovern or the anti-Washington conservative Carter and lessening the potential influence of single-issue politics in the selection process.[13]

Following a series of meetings held from August 1981 to February 1982, the Hunt Commission issued a report which recommended the set aside of unelected and unpledged delegate slots for Democratic members of Congress and for state party chairs and vice chairs (so-called "superdelegates").[13] With the original Hunt plan, superdelegates were to represent 30% of all delegates to the national convention, but when it was finally implemented by the Democratic National Committee for the 1984 election, the number of superdelegates was set 14%. Over time this percentage has gradually increased, until by 2008 the percentage stands at approximately 20% of total delegates to the Democratic Party nominating convention.[14]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdelegate

THIS is how the Democratic party primary elections are rigged. The Democratic party leadership just did not want to give up their 'cigar smoke filled back rooms' and let the people decide.

A Democrat needed 2382 delegated to win.

In the Democrat primaries, Clinton got 2271 and Sanders got 1820. Neither one 'got enough' to win the nomination outright.

Enter the Superdelegates. THEY (the Democrat party leadership) decided the nomination... NOT 'the People' in the Democratic Party. If they went to Sanders, Sanders would have been the nominee. If they went to Clinton, Clinton would have been the nominee. They went Clinton.

What does this matter? Here is why.

In July 2016, Ms. Schultz (chairperson from May 2011 to July 2016) resigned from the DNC over the leaked emails showing DNC bias against Sanders (little surprise there... she was on Clinton's campaign back in 2008). Ms. Brazile took over the DNC as interim chairperson. She promised Sanders, according to her memoirs, she would investigate the bias against him. Again, per her memoirs, she did so and found out it was true and actual... and worse.

Per Ms. Brazile, the DNC was deep in money trouble in the run up to this campaign, and Clinton bailed them out and grabbed control well before she was even the nominee, also gaining control over all the State Democratic parties as well. This control meant that Clinton had control of which candidate got what money all up and down the ticket. Ms. Brazile used the phrase 'money laundering' describing the situation.

Clinton had the nomination bought and paid for well before the nomination process really began.

The Democrats and the Republicans faced much the same difficulty before their conventions. The People in the USA had really... tired of both Parties' establishments. As Anti-Establishment candidates, Sanders was very popular on the Democrat's side, and Trump was the same on the Republican's side.

The Republican party establishment choked down their own vomit and let Trump have the Republican nomination, seeing a win for the R's on the way.

The Democrat party establishment did every thing they could to stop Sanders, and they did, so that their 'owner' Clinton could have the nomination.

Yes, the Republicans put 'good of party' ahead of 'good of country'. S.S.D.D. (for both parties).
This time, the Democrats didn't even do that. They let Clinton put 'good of self' ahead of 'good of party'.

At the end of the process, after the States had conducted their individual elections, and chosen their electors to the E.C., the E.C. had voted... Well, the nation got Trump, and Clinton got a resounding "eff off". Things could have been greatly different if Clinton had not had the nomination for the Democratic Party 'fixed' in her favor. Remember, it was apparent to the Sanders supporters that it was fixed, even without any 'proof' coming out.

It was Clinton and her monomaniacal desire to be President that put Trump in the White House. Without her 'fix', she might have had to, you know, be diplomatic with Sanders about things. Perhaps putting him as her VP. Nope. Sanders was screwed coming out of the starting gate. Enough of Sander's supporters knew it and stayed home and didn't vote so that it gave the election to Trump.

Note: I am sure that everyone knows Trump is having... difficulty with Kim and the DPRK... involving nuclear weapons. Remember who said that if Clinton won there would be nuclear war between the USA and their nation?

Putin.

---

https://youtu.be/iY57ErBkFFE

#Texit

Don't blame me, I voted for Johnson(L) in 2016.

Truth is dangerous... especially when it challenges those in power.

---

...

IMHO I don't think anybody will disagree that probably as long ago as 2008, or before, that the Dems decided that if Obama won the 2008 nomination, Clinton would get the nomination for 2016 and vice versa.

P.S. Isn't talk, specifically of Dems only, in this thread 'off topic'

IMHO I don't think anybody will disagree that probably as long ago as 2008, or before, that the Dems decided that if Obama won the 2008 nomination, Clinton would get the nomination for 2016 and vice versa.

P.S. Isn't talk, specifically of Dems only, in this thread 'off topic'

Agree with your first statement, Yes everyone agrees and that is the problem with what American Politics has become. The common citizen has no say in whom EACH party chooses as candidates, it's decided by how much $$$$$ each candidate can bring to the party coffers. No difference on either side and it's a dilemma the founding fathers tried to avoid and warned future citizens against.

AND no it is not off topic to discuss possible reasons Trump became the elected President of the USA which includes failed Dim ideas and policies.

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

Wilber Ross, a tRumper has dealings with Russians on the sanctions list. Interesting. Wonder how long before there are some more charges ...

Paradise Papers

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nx5GwULPU90

---

Now Flynn and son, haven't even gotten into the Paradise Papers yet!
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-mueller/special-counsel-mueller-has-enough-evidence-to-charge-flynn-son-nbc-idUSKBN1D50VE

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Special Counsel Robert Mueller has collected sufficient evidence to charge Michael Flynn, U.S. President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser, and his son, NBC News reported on Sunday, citing multiple sources familiar with the investigation.

Yep, the witch hunt continues and it looks like Flynn will be caught by them. The witches will catch many.

---