Computation Errors for Blc WU

Message boards : Number crunching : Computation Errors for Blc WU
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Graeme J

Send message
Joined: 12 Apr 01
Posts: 15
Credit: 50,821,397
RAC: 6
Australia
Message 1870172 - Posted: 29 May 2017, 21:03:08 UTC

I have two computers one running a Xeon 1230 and an Nvidia GTX 1050 Ti, the other an i5 7600 with a GTX 750 Ti. The Xeon machine will not process Blc WU while the other one does. I have reloaded Boinc on the Xeon machine but nothing happened. Any help greatly appreciated as this is just wasting time for the project . TIA.
ID: 1870172 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 34744
Credit: 261,360,520
RAC: 489
Australia
Message 1870173 - Posted: 29 May 2017, 21:16:38 UTC

error -7 Garbled encoded workunit


I'd do a memory test with MemTest86+ first to see if that is causing the data to be garbled.

Another thing I noticed on both of your rigs is that you are allowing Win10 to choose your video drivers (no OpenCL component with them), download the latest drivers from Nvidia.

Cheers.
ID: 1870173 · Report as offensive
Profile Graeme J

Send message
Joined: 12 Apr 01
Posts: 15
Credit: 50,821,397
RAC: 6
Australia
Message 1870753 - Posted: 2 Jun 2017, 22:55:31 UTC - in response to Message 1870173.  

Thanks Wiggo,
Still no luck. Have checked memory and downloaded latest Nvidia driver on the Xeon machine. Still will not process Blc WU on GPU or CPU. The other machine runs Blc on both CPU and GPU. The app_info file I use is the same for both.
Any other thoughts??
TIA
ID: 1870753 · Report as offensive
Profile Bill G Special Project $75 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Jun 01
Posts: 1282
Credit: 187,688,550
RAC: 182
United States
Message 1870755 - Posted: 2 Jun 2017, 23:00:14 UTC - in response to Message 1870753.  

Did you do a clean install, not just an update?
Just a thought.

SETI@home classic workunits 4,019
SETI@home classic CPU time 34,348 hours
ID: 1870755 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 34744
Credit: 261,360,520
RAC: 489
Australia
Message 1870758 - Posted: 2 Jun 2017, 23:09:20 UTC

The only other things that I can think of is,

1/ Test the hard drive with the manufacturer's diagnostic software.

2/ Overheating?

3/ Is your antivirus interfering?

Other than that I'm out of ideas.

Cheers.
ID: 1870758 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13727
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 1870759 - Posted: 2 Jun 2017, 23:09:58 UTC - in response to Message 1870753.  
Last modified: 2 Jun 2017, 23:11:51 UTC

SETI@home error -7 Garbled encoded workunit
There is a problem with those WUs.

And the ones that run are marked invalid.
You're also running CUDA50, SoG is faster. But still, CUDA shouldn't result in errors and it certainly won't affect CPU work.

I'd suggest running chkdsk and make sure there are no issues with the file system or HDD.
What AV programme are you running? I'd set it to leave the BOINC Data directory untouched.

If they all check OK, I'd suggest detaching from the project, uninstall BOINC, make sure any directories are removed. Reinstall BOINC, reattach to the projects.
Let it run the stock applications for a while. If all is good, rerun Lunatics (i'd suggest the Beta6 installer and make use of the AVX & SoG applications) and see if things stay good.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1870759 · Report as offensive
TBar
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 22 May 99
Posts: 5204
Credit: 840,779,836
RAC: 2,768
United States
Message 1870761 - Posted: 2 Jun 2017, 23:14:51 UTC - in response to Message 1870753.  

Thanks Wiggo,
Still no luck. Have checked memory and downloaded latest Nvidia driver on the Xeon machine. Still will not process Blc WU on GPU or CPU. The other machine runs Blc on both CPU and GPU. The app_info file I use is the same for both.
Any other thoughts??
TIA
Somehow you have installed the Older Version 7 Applications on the one machine;
Application version: SETI@home v8
Windows optimized S@H v7 application
https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=5780137994
Application version SETI@home v8
setiathome enhanced x41zc, Cuda 5.00 - Detected setiathome_enhanced_v7 task
https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=5780206699

You'd probably have better success using Version 8 Applications with Version 8 tasks.
ID: 1870761 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 34744
Credit: 261,360,520
RAC: 489
Australia
Message 1870765 - Posted: 2 Jun 2017, 23:22:15 UTC
Last modified: 2 Jun 2017, 23:22:58 UTC

Somehow you have installed the Older Version 7 Applications on the one machine;
Application version: SETI@home v8
Windows optimized S@H v7 application
https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=5780137994
Application version SETI@home v8
setiathome enhanced x41zc, Cuda 5.00 - Detected setiathome_enhanced_v7 task
https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=5780206699

You'd probably have better success using Version 8 Applications with Version 8 tasks.

Bingo!

I should've read further down those further into those result outputs.

Your using a very old Lunatics installer there and you can get the latest version (Lunatics 0.45 Beta 6) from here.

Cheers.
ID: 1870765 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13727
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 1870783 - Posted: 2 Jun 2017, 23:59:11 UTC - in response to Message 1870761.  

Somehow you have installed the Older Version 7 Applications on the one machine;

Well spotted.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1870783 · Report as offensive
Profile Graeme J

Send message
Joined: 12 Apr 01
Posts: 15
Credit: 50,821,397
RAC: 6
Australia
Message 1870790 - Posted: 3 Jun 2017, 0:32:31 UTC - in response to Message 1870783.  

Thanks for your assistance everyone, greatly appreciated.
Have downloaded latest Lunatics and will see how that goes.
Thanks again.
ID: 1870790 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13727
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 1870798 - Posted: 3 Jun 2017, 0:43:42 UTC - in response to Message 1870790.  

Thanks for your assistance everyone, greatly appreciated.
Have downloaded latest Lunatics and will see how that goes.
Thanks again.

I'd suggest AVX for the CPU and SoG for the GPU, with a few optimized values. Checkout Wiggos run times for examples of how it performs on hardware similar to your GTX 1050.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1870798 · Report as offensive
Profile Graeme J

Send message
Joined: 12 Apr 01
Posts: 15
Credit: 50,821,397
RAC: 6
Australia
Message 1870857 - Posted: 3 Jun 2017, 8:50:26 UTC - in response to Message 1870798.  

Thanks again everyone. The Xeon machine is now processing Blc... WUs.
ID: 1870857 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13727
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 1870858 - Posted: 3 Jun 2017, 9:24:48 UTC - in response to Message 1870857.  
Last modified: 3 Jun 2017, 9:32:57 UTC

I see you've opted for the SoG application, it'll do quite a bit more work than the older CUDA application was able to.

There are tweaks you can use to get still more work out of it, but it depends on whether it's a dedicated cruncher or your system for general use as to what values to use.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1870858 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Computation Errors for Blc WU


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.