What is the lower powered/Fastest GPU? I already have a GTX 750 Ti

Message boards : Number crunching : What is the lower powered/Fastest GPU? I already have a GTX 750 Ti
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Tom M
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 28 Nov 02
Posts: 5124
Credit: 276,046,078
RAC: 462
Message 1869314 - Posted: 25 May 2017, 12:15:46 UTC

What I am working around is an HP Z400 power supply (475 watts).

It will successfully run two GTX 750 Ti's at once. So I think I can run a single faster card if the power requirements are "low" enough. It looks like a GeForce GTX 1060 (upto 120 watts) may have a low enough power draw to work on my Xeon box.

Are there any better candidates? I am presuming that all the GPU cards that draw (upto) 175 watts are completely out of my league. eg: GTX 1080 etc.

No, I can't upgrade the PS within any reasonable budget (its a proprietary Motherboard/PS setup). It would be less trouble to switch out the whole box (probably more expensive though).

Thank you for your thoughts on this.

Tom Milller
A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association).
ID: 1869314 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 34744
Credit: 261,360,520
RAC: 489
Australia
Message 1869316 - Posted: 25 May 2017, 12:21:50 UTC

The other option then are the 1050Ti's, the modern equivalent of the old 750Ti's.

Cheers.
ID: 1869316 · Report as offensive
Profile Brent Norman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 99
Posts: 2786
Credit: 685,657,289
RAC: 835
Canada
Message 1869332 - Posted: 25 May 2017, 14:04:44 UTC - in response to Message 1869314.  
Last modified: 25 May 2017, 14:11:33 UTC

I can tell you that my 1070 runs 120-125W under Linux which pushes the cards really hard. So one 1070 would be around the 100-120W load under Windows meeting that requirement.

Here's a 750Ti vs 1070 comparison in Linux:
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 375.39                 Driver Version: 375.39                    |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
|   0  GeForce GTX 750 Ti  On   | 0000:03:00.0      On |                  N/A |
| 45%   57C    P0    21W /  38W |   1511MiB /  1999MiB |     98%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   1  GeForce GTX 1070    On   | 0000:04:00.0     Off |                  N/A |
| 28%   47C    P2   116W / 151W |   2168MiB /  8114MiB |     94%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
EDIT: And 1080 vs 980:
|===============================+======================+======================|
|   0  GeForce GTX 980     On   | 0000:02:00.0     Off |                  N/A |
| 26%   36C    P2   135W / 180W |   2160MiB /  4038MiB |     86%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   1  GeForce GTX 1080    On   | 0000:03:00.0      On |                  N/A |
| 31%   48C    P2   127W / 180W |   2735MiB /  8112MiB |     92%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   2  GeForce GTX 1080    On   | 0000:04:00.0     Off |                  N/A |
| 29%   46C    P2   135W / 180W |   2504MiB /  8114MiB |     96%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
Steven should be able to give you an actual power draw with 1060's.

The 1080 draw is not as high as one might think, my peaks would be at 150W, but 130 is more normal and may work for you as well.
ID: 1869332 · Report as offensive
Stephen "Heretic" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 12
Posts: 5557
Credit: 192,787,363
RAC: 628
Australia
Message 1869450 - Posted: 25 May 2017, 23:44:00 UTC - in response to Message 1869316.  

The other option then are the 1050Ti's, the modern equivalent of the old 750Ti's.

Cheers.


. . Although probably lower in individual productivity than Tom was hoping for, a pair of them would probably come close to matching the output of one 1060. Not sure there is any benefit in output/power consumed though. For perspective my HP box only has a 240W PSU and is happily running my GTX1050ti, so his 400W plus PSU should cope easily with two of them. But my 1050ti is drawing about 60W at full crunch and my 1060s are only drawing about 90W also at full crunch. So I would expect he could probably run a brace of 1060s with his PSU if he has 2 suitable PCIe slots. That would give him some serious crunching power.

. . As a baseline my HP has a total power draw of about 110W to 120W with one 1050ti. My clunky old Pentium D with 2 x 1060s has a total draw of a little over 300W. So I feel his setup could support that at a pinch. But again, if he has enough PCIe connectors on his PSU maybe a single 1070 would draw less total power. But I still think 2 x 1060s might give better overall bang for your buck.

Stephen

:)
ID: 1869450 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13736
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 1869485 - Posted: 26 May 2017, 6:51:20 UTC - in response to Message 1869332.  

So one 1070 would be around the 100-120W load under Windows meeting that requirement.

Yep.
My GTX 1070s generally sit at around 15-110W, and around 110-120W or so with Arecibo WUs.

Keep in mind that with the release and use of a more optimized application their power usage would increase significantly.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1869485 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : What is the lower powered/Fastest GPU? I already have a GTX 750 Ti


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.