Setting up Linux to crunch CUDA90 and above for Windows users

Message boards : Number crunching : Setting up Linux to crunch CUDA90 and above for Windows users
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 81 · 82 · 83 · 84 · 85 · 86 · 87 . . . 162 · Next

AuthorMessage
Stephen "Heretic" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 12
Posts: 5557
Credit: 192,787,363
RAC: 628
Australia
Message 1958322 - Posted: 4 Oct 2018, 1:34:30 UTC - in response to Message 1958264.  
Last modified: 4 Oct 2018, 1:37:28 UTC

which version of the app are you running? the standard zi3v? or one of the newer variants?

for now, i am looking only at the inconclusives on my 2 older linux hosts (im not including the newest one since i just brought it online last night and it has not reached "steady state" with regard to stats.

of these 2 hosts, one of them is running 2x 1050tis and is NOT overclocked, but does exibit a current inconclusive rate of about 4.68%. i could be mistaken, but i thought it was lower in the past. i have not made any changes to this system for several months, so that's why i thought the increase in inconclusives was because of newer WUs.

the other system has 2x 1060s and is overclocked a bit (but i dont remember how much, it's nothing crazy). it's seeing a current inconclusive rate of about 3.9%, and has actually dropped since i looked last night where it was closer to 5%.

both of these hosts are more or less identical from a software standpoint.

maybe it's just crappy wingmen.

EDIT
even my windows machines on SoG seem to be seeing higher than normal inconclives. the best one is sitting at 2.8% and the worst one at 3.9% (but its a low producer). something else is going on here. ironically, among my systems, the more heavily overclocked ones are showing better inconclusive rates xD. probably just coincidence, but still interesting.


. . Both Linux boxes are running 0.97 from before the "Bananas in Pyjamas" versions (read B1 and B2 :) ), I think it has been called the multiverse release. I have stayed with this because the 'B' releases do not support the -pfl or -pfe parameters. And if Zi3v ever did support them I was unaware of it. With Zi3v the rates were lower but I wasn't crunching the current batches of units with that (at least not that I have recorded). I am curious that the GBT tasks we are getting now seem to have reverted (based on run times) to the original format, before they did whatever they did that got them to run much quicker. But even with these slower versions it seems to not be all of them having the rise in inconclusives, it seems to be different 'batches' or tapes maybe where they go up.

. . Computers will often confound you. It amuses me that the overclocked rigs show better results ... :)

. . While 5% has been proposed as the 'acceptable' limit for inconclusives I like to keep it below 2% if possible. And that is about where mine are ... most of the time. The main thing, and this tends to support the wingman effect, is that I have Zero (0) invalids. The only thing that bothers me is that the rig with the 970s tends to hit the 4% plus level most often so I am wondering if I should drop it back to -pfl 256 as well, though even with that setting it still had the occasional 4% peak just as the box with the 1050ti still does.

. . Oh, and another factor that points the finger at the WU batches is the way in which inconclusives are often higher with CPU crunched tasks than with the Cuda90 results.

Stephen

. .
ID: 1958322 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Keith Myers Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 01
Posts: 13164
Credit: 1,160,866,277
RAC: 1,873
United States
Message 1958334 - Posted: 4 Oct 2018, 2:58:17 UTC

I'd have to agree with your assessment of the zi3v app versus any flavor of the 0.97 apps including the "b" versions with pfb defaults and loss of pfe parameter. The "b" versions seem to have stabilized at about 4.6% Inconclusive rate on my hosts.
Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)
ID: 1958334 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
JohnDK Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 May 00
Posts: 1222
Credit: 451,243,443
RAC: 1,127
Denmark
Message 1959135 - Posted: 7 Oct 2018, 21:45:23 UTC
Last modified: 7 Oct 2018, 21:49:05 UTC

Fine with me. But, don't be surprised after the next system update to find a repository version of boinc back in var/lib with a new system ID and loads of tasks.

For the rest of you, the first thing to do would be to backup the boinc-client folder. Then open Synaptic Package Manager and Remove, Including Configuration Files, anything installed pertaining to boinc or seti. Then search the system folder for anything leftover. After that, copy the Boinc All-In-One to Home and populate it with the boinc files from your backed-up boinc-client folder. If you're lucky, all the repository files were removed correctly and the Berkeley BOINC will work fine in your Home folder.

If you are already running the Berkeley version of BOINC from your Home folder, then there isn't any trouble updating, or downgrading, the installed version of BOINC. It's a simple matter of replacing the 5 boinc files in your BOINC folder as mentioned earlier.

I first read your post now, so I didn't delete anything...

But so far it's working by copying all the BOINC config files to the BOINC home folder. Strange though stating boincmgr from home folder startede the repo BOINC but starting it from the krusader program it worked. All backup projects runs now, hope we will get new seti work soon...

Wonder what happens if I uninstall repo BOINC now.
ID: 1959135 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
TBar
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 22 May 99
Posts: 5204
Credit: 840,779,836
RAC: 2,768
United States
Message 1959138 - Posted: 7 Oct 2018, 21:53:41 UTC - in response to Message 1959135.  

If you don't Completely Remove All BOINC Repository files from the System folder, then Very Strange things will happen when trying to run the Berkeley BOINC from your Home folder....Guaranteed.
<nods head>
ID: 1959138 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Stephen "Heretic" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 12
Posts: 5557
Credit: 192,787,363
RAC: 628
Australia
Message 1959586 - Posted: 10 Oct 2018, 21:44:03 UTC

. . OK the problem with the new rig is that Lubuntu seems to have done something to the Windows drive even though it was not active when I shut it down. The machine had been crunching happily under Windows for several weeks, but when I try to restart it I get a grub error. I have disconnected the Linux SSD completely but I still get the same grub error, so it must have put something on the Windows drive. Does anyone know how to remove all trace of Linux from an NTFS windows drive?

Stephen

? ?
ID: 1959586 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Keith Myers Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 01
Posts: 13164
Credit: 1,160,866,277
RAC: 1,873
United States
Message 1959588 - Posted: 10 Oct 2018, 22:04:20 UTC - in response to Message 1959586.  

I would say no it did not put anything on the Windows drive. The grub entries for the Windows drive changed is all. Likely the UUID number for the drive changed.
Run blkid from Terminal and note what the UUID for the Windows drive is. Then examine the grub.cfg file in /boot/grub for the entry identifying the Windows installation and compare the UUID numbers from what blkid showed. Correct the Windows entry if necessary.
Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)
ID: 1959588 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Stephen "Heretic" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 12
Posts: 5557
Credit: 192,787,363
RAC: 628
Australia
Message 1959593 - Posted: 10 Oct 2018, 23:02:06 UTC - in response to Message 1959588.  
Last modified: 10 Oct 2018, 23:59:27 UTC

I would say no it did not put anything on the Windows drive. The grub entries for the Windows drive changed is all. Likely the UUID number for the drive changed.
Run blkid from Terminal and note what the UUID for the Windows drive is. Then examine the grub.cfg file in /boot/grub for the entry identifying the Windows installation and compare the UUID numbers from what blkid showed. Correct the Windows entry if necessary.


. . OK, I just had a feeling of empathy for Penny on the Big Bang Theory. Firstly, I have disconnected the Linux drive so there is only the Windows SSD connected (and a USB drive with the SETI data on it). There must be something from Linux on the Windows drive for it to give a grub error ... ?? Secondly, since I cannot boot into an OS I can't do much, I have booted up from the Lubuntu 'Live' USB disk which boots OK and it can see the Windows drive but can I do what is needed from such a state? I guess I'll suck it and see ...

<edit>
. . OK, I ran the blkid and got a UUID for each of the partitions on the Windows drive (system, main and recovery) but it indicates that I am in the Windows drive, main partition, in folder /media/lubuntu but File manager does not see such a folder even when 'display hidden' is on. Not even a /media folder. I am guessing that the grub.cfg file is secreted somewhere in this partition.

. . On booting the errors are -
no such device <8>-<4>-<4>-<4>-<12> {number of digits}
unknown file system
<Grub rescue> prompt

. . Since I was having trouble with the Lubuntu install I doubt if reconnecting the Linux drive would help ... but who knows ...

Stephen ? ?

:(
ID: 1959593 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Keith Myers Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 01
Posts: 13164
Credit: 1,160,866,277
RAC: 1,873
United States
Message 1959619 - Posted: 11 Oct 2018, 1:36:05 UTC - in response to Message 1959593.  

You need to learn about grub I guess. Maybe read up on it or watch some of the many YT tutorials. I assume you are running a dual-disk system with each OS on its own disk? So either you installed grub into the MBR of the Windows disk or possibly into an EFI partition on either of the disks if UEFI based. You should be able to see either disk if booting off the Live USB stick. The /boot/grub directory is in the main Linux partition. You can see all your partitions on all your disks if you launch the gparted or Disks applications from the Live USB stick. You should be able to maneuver to any disk you can see in those applications if you mount them with Nautilus or the File Manager. Use the Disks application to mount the drives. You need to be root to edit the grub.cfg file.

Grub is the bootloader to allow you to select either the Windows or Linux installation to boot from. The pointer that identified the Windows boot installation got changed somehow. Did you update your BIOS by chance? That will usually reenumerate the USB and drive resources. Or did you install a new drive or plug in another USB drive?

Maybe start with this page Ways To Rescue Or Recover Grub
Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)
ID: 1959619 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
TBar
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 22 May 99
Posts: 5204
Credit: 840,779,836
RAC: 2,768
United States
Message 1959624 - Posted: 11 Oct 2018, 2:04:25 UTC - in response to Message 1959593.  

I think the way I remember Windows boot problems it went something like, Boot to Windows Install media, Go to Repair section, Tell it to FIX MBR & FIX BOOT. I vaguely remember that from somewhere...I could be wrong.

I would say no it did not put anything on the Windows drive. The grub entries for the Windows drive changed is all. Likely the UUID number for the drive changed.
Run blkid from Terminal and note what the UUID for the Windows drive is. Then examine the grub.cfg file in /boot/grub for the entry identifying the Windows installation and compare the UUID numbers from what blkid showed. Correct the Windows entry if necessary.


. . OK, I just had a feeling of empathy for Penny on the Big Bang Theory. Firstly, I have disconnected the Linux drive so there is only the Windows SSD connected (and a USB drive with the SETI data on it). There must be something from Linux on the Windows drive for it to give a grub error ... ?? Secondly, since I cannot boot into an OS I can't do much, I have booted up from the Lubuntu 'Live' USB disk which boots OK and it can see the Windows drive but can I do what is needed from such a state? I guess I'll suck it and see ...

<edit>
. . OK, I ran the blkid and got a UUID for each of the partitions on the Windows drive (system, main and recovery) but it indicates that I am in the Windows drive, main partition, in folder /media/lubuntu but File manager does not see such a folder even when 'display hidden' is on. Not even a /media folder. I am guessing that the grub.cfg file is secreted somewhere in this partition.

. . On booting the errors are -
no such device <8>-<4>-<4>-<4>-<12> {number of digits}
unknown file system
<Grub rescue> prompt

. . Since I was having trouble with the Lubuntu install I doubt if reconnecting the Linux drive would help ... but who knows ...

Stephen ? ?

:(
ID: 1959624 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Keith Myers Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 01
Posts: 13164
Credit: 1,160,866,277
RAC: 1,873
United States
Message 1959625 - Posted: 11 Oct 2018, 2:06:43 UTC - in response to Message 1959624.  

I think the way I remember Windows boot problems it went something like, Boot to Windows Install media, Go to Repair section, Tell it to FIX MBR & FIX BOOT. I vaguely remember that from somewhere...I could be wrong.

That would be the brute force way of getting back into Windows. But you won't be able to get back into Linux that way without re-installing grub2 again.
Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)
ID: 1959625 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Keith Myers Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 01
Posts: 13164
Credit: 1,160,866,277
RAC: 1,873
United States
Message 1959626 - Posted: 11 Oct 2018, 2:11:07 UTC - in response to Message 1959625.  

I avoided issues with grub when I had Linux and Windows on separate drives like you do by not using grub to select the target boot OS. I used, and still do, just use the BIOS to select the drive I want to boot from. Takes grub out of the equation in that respect.
Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)
ID: 1959626 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Stephen "Heretic" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 12
Posts: 5557
Credit: 192,787,363
RAC: 628
Australia
Message 1959639 - Posted: 11 Oct 2018, 3:37:12 UTC - in response to Message 1959619.  
Last modified: 11 Oct 2018, 3:53:49 UTC

You need to learn about grub I guess. Maybe read up on it or watch some of the many YT tutorials. I assume you are running a dual-disk system with each OS on its own disk? So either you installed grub into the MBR of the Windows disk or possibly into an EFI partition on either of the disks if UEFI based. You should be able to see either disk if booting off the Live USB stick. The /boot/grub directory is in the main Linux partition. You can see all your partitions on all your disks if you launch the gparted or Disks applications from the Live USB stick. You should be able to maneuver to any disk you can see in those applications if you mount them with Nautilus or the File Manager. Use the Disks application to mount the drives. You need to be root to edit the grub.cfg file.

Grub is the bootloader to allow you to select either the Windows or Linux installation to boot from. The pointer that identified the Windows boot installation got changed somehow. Did you update your BIOS by chance? That will usually reenumerate the USB and drive resources. Or did you install a new drive or plug in another USB drive?

Maybe start with this page Ways To Rescue Or Recover Grub


. . First, yes dual drive system 250GB SSD for Windows and 120GB SSD for Linux. I had it configured for boot from the 120GB and I would select Windows from the Linux boot menu. This is why when I was getting a Grub error I disconnected the Linux drive and set the BIOS boot priority to the Windows drive. This should have gone straight into the windows bootloader but nope. I didn't install any Linux components on the Windows drive, the whole point was to keep them totally segregated. But clearly something has at some stage done just that. I have not created any Linux partition/s on the Windows drive either. My first instinct was to boot from the windows 10 CD and do a repair of the windows drive. But in my usual well ordered fashion I have misplaced the Windows 10 CD :(

. . I had a look at that link and read through it to try and find the most appropriate method, but too many options only confused me :(

. . The only recent changes were when Microsoft launched one of their 'Windows updates you can't refuse" and as usual trashed my video drivers which I re-installed from the downloaded Nvidia drivers file. It booted successfully when that was complete and I am not aware of any changes since then. I have tried a few Linux OS installs but all that was pointed at the now disconnected drive.

. . I will try the 'Live' disk again and see if I can find out more with gparted. I considered that before but wasn't sure if it was safe in the 'Live' mode.

Stephen

<scratching head>
ID: 1959639 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Stephen "Heretic" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 12
Posts: 5557
Credit: 192,787,363
RAC: 628
Australia
Message 1959643 - Posted: 11 Oct 2018, 3:43:13 UTC - in response to Message 1959624.  
Last modified: 11 Oct 2018, 3:43:29 UTC

I think the way I remember Windows boot problems it went something like, Boot to Windows Install media, Go to Repair section, Tell it to FIX MBR & FIX BOOT. I vaguely remember that from somewhere...I could be wrong.


. . Yep that sounded pretty right to me too, until I couldn't find my Windows 10 install disk :( I think I need a secretary.

. . I am going to try Keith's suggestion and run gparted from the Lubuntu 'live' disk, crossing fingers.

Stephen

<wishing I wasn't bald so I could at least have the satisfaction of pulling my hair out>
ID: 1959643 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Stephen "Heretic" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 12
Posts: 5557
Credit: 192,787,363
RAC: 628
Australia
Message 1959645 - Posted: 11 Oct 2018, 3:47:02 UTC - in response to Message 1959625.  

I think the way I remember Windows boot problems it went something like, Boot to Windows Install media, Go to Repair section, Tell it to FIX MBR & FIX BOOT. I vaguely remember that from somewhere...I could be wrong.

That would be the brute force way of getting back into Windows. But you won't be able to get back into Linux that way without re-installing grub2 again.


. . Yep, but on that machine only the Windows install has been in regular productive use. I expect to re-install the Linux OS anyway so it seemed the best option, if I could only remember where I put that damned disk.

Stephen

:(
ID: 1959645 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Keith Myers Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 01
Posts: 13164
Credit: 1,160,866,277
RAC: 1,873
United States
Message 1959653 - Posted: 11 Oct 2018, 5:26:07 UTC - in response to Message 1959639.  
Last modified: 11 Oct 2018, 5:40:33 UTC

Question is where is the bootloader? The Linux system may be installed on its separate drive but when you installed it and accepted defaults, when the installer saw the other Windows drive it probably installed the grub bootloader in the MBR of the Windows system. So as long as the Windows system is attached to the computer, the grub bootloader is going to be active.

The better method in my opinion is to install the bootloader in an EFI FAT32 partition all on its own keeping the Windows completely untouched by grub and Linux completely untouched by grub. So the grub bootloader simply has the UUID pointers for each disk and lets each individual OS bootstrap itself into running.

If you don't know what is going on and don't want to learn how grub works and just want to get running again, I would just run the standard Windows FIX_MBR and FIX_Boot utilities to enable the Windows MBR to boot the Windows drive normally again. Then I would resize and repartition the Linux or Windows drive and make a small EFI FAT32 partition which is usually just a couple hundred megabytes just to hold the grub bootloader.

[Edit] Thought maybe a picture worth a thousand words. Here is my system. The grub bootloader is the highlighted FAT32 538MB partition between my two operating system partitions. Notice it is mounted at /boot/efi. This is the partition that the BIOS points to first for loading. Then the grub menu is presented to me to choose either the default partition at the beginning of the disk or to boot the OS occupying the partition at the end of the disk

EFI FAT32 Grub bootloader partition
Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)
ID: 1959653 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Tom M
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 28 Nov 02
Posts: 5124
Credit: 276,046,078
RAC: 462
Message 1959703 - Posted: 11 Oct 2018, 11:07:43 UTC - in response to Message 1959586.  
Last modified: 11 Oct 2018, 11:08:17 UTC

. . OK the problem with the new rig is that Lubuntu seems to have done something to the Windows drive even though it was not active when I shut it down. The machine had been crunching happily under Windows for several weeks, but when I try to restart it I get a grub error. I have disconnected the Linux SSD completely but I still get the same grub error, so it must have put something on the Windows drive. Does anyone know how to remove all trace of Linux from an NTFS windows drive?

Stephen

? ?


I think the "windows repair" function will in Win10. If you are running Win7 I have used the command line tool that talks about "fix boot"(track) to get rid of the grub startup.

You can access either by booting from a Windows setup disk and looking for the "repair os" url on I think the 2nd screen right after the first screen.

Tom
A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association).
ID: 1959703 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Tom M
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 28 Nov 02
Posts: 5124
Credit: 276,046,078
RAC: 462
Message 1959883 - Posted: 12 Oct 2018, 12:45:37 UTC

I know we don't use command line parameters (mostly) on the CUDA90/91 app.

    Are we using command line parameters on any of the cpu apps?

    What does your "app_config.xml" file look like?

    Are you doing any "tuning" to your motherboard?

    Are you doing any "tuning" to your gpu/cpu?



Thank you.


A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association).
ID: 1959883 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Stephen "Heretic" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 12
Posts: 5557
Credit: 192,787,363
RAC: 628
Australia
Message 1960908 - Posted: 19 Oct 2018, 11:32:33 UTC - in response to Message 1959653.  

Question is where is the bootloader? The Linux system may be installed on its separate drive but when you installed it and accepted defaults, when the installer saw the other Windows drive it probably installed the grub bootloader in the MBR of the Windows system. So as long as the Windows system is attached to the computer, the grub bootloader is going to be active.

. . That's the thing that bothers me, I never accept the defaults, I always use a custom install and point everything to the 2nd SSD for Linux. And it was working even after the M$ "update you can't refuse" screwed the video drivers again and I had to re-install the Nvidia download. It booted just fine at the end of all that. But after I shut it down manually to avoid lightning damage it refuses to boot and gives a grub error with just the Windows SSD connected. So something, at some time after that, has written some grub component to that drive.

If you don't know what is going on and don't want to learn how grub works and just want to get running again, I would just run the standard Windows FIX_MBR and FIX_Boot utilities to enable the Windows MBR to boot the Windows drive normally again. Then I would resize and repartition the Linux or Windows drive and make a small EFI FAT32 partition which is usually just a couple hundred megabytes just to hold the grub bootloader.

. . Not being able to find my Windows 10 install CD I finally borrowed one from a friend and booted it up to run the boot repair option which failed and declared it could not fix the drive. :(

. . It is very frustrating :(

Stephen

:(
ID: 1960908 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Stephen "Heretic" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 12
Posts: 5557
Credit: 192,787,363
RAC: 628
Australia
Message 1960911 - Posted: 19 Oct 2018, 11:34:42 UTC - in response to Message 1959703.  

I think the "windows repair" function will in Win10. If you are running Win7 I have used the command line tool that talks about "fix boot"(track) to get rid of the grub startup.
You can access either by booting from a Windows setup disk and looking for the "repair os" url on I think the 2nd screen right after the first screen.
Tom


. . Thanks Tom, I gave that a try but it failed saying it could not fix the drive.

Stephen

:(
ID: 1960911 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Stephen "Heretic" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 12
Posts: 5557
Credit: 192,787,363
RAC: 628
Australia
Message 1960915 - Posted: 19 Oct 2018, 11:40:34 UTC - in response to Message 1959883.  

    Are we using command line parameters on any of the cpu apps? NO

    What does your "app_config.xml" file look like? See above

    Are you doing any "tuning" to your motherboard? NO

    Are you doing any "tuning" to your gpu/cpu? Just the ones amply covered by Petri and TBar before the B1/B2 releases; -pfl 256 and -pfe which are now discarded in the aforementioned releases and -nobs.



Stephen

. .

ID: 1960915 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 81 · 82 · 83 · 84 · 85 · 86 · 87 . . . 162 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Setting up Linux to crunch CUDA90 and above for Windows users


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.