Wikipedia: where truth dies online
http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/wikipedia-where-truth-dies-online/14963

A man knocks at your door. You answer and he tells you he is an encyclopedia salesman.
‘I have the largest and most comprehensive encyclopedia the world has ever seen’, he says.
‘Tell me about it!’
‘It has more editors and more entries than any other encyclopedia ever. Most of the contributors are anonymous and no entry is ever finished. It is constantly changing. Any entry may be different each time you go back to it. Celebrities and companies pay PR agencies to edit entries. Controversial topics are often the subject of edit wars that can go on for years and involve scores of editors. Pranksters and jokers may change entries and insert bogus facts. Whole entries about events that never happened may be created. Other entries will disappear without notice. Experts may be banned from editing subjects that they are leading authorities on, because they are cited as primary sources. University academics and teachers warn their students to exercise extreme caution when using it. Nothing in it can be relied on. You will never know whether anything you read in it is true or not. Are you interested?’

LOL:)
But that means you don't trust anybody.
So why giving us links to very well known fake news media!
Soon Fox News will be renamed to Trump News.

Soon Fox News will be renamed to Trump News.

I don't get it... that wasn't a Fox News link. If you're saying Fox is a "fake news" site, it isn't even close. Sure it has a lot of "spin" and they don't try to hide or apologize for that, but all of its stories are verified and properly sourced, and they also make corrections when they are wrong (as in the link I just posted.) If we call any news we disagree with "fake news" it dilutes the term.

Another good example happened after the Montreal mosque massacre. The police initially thought one of the witnesses (a Moroccan) was a suspect due to the confusion, but quickly determined he wasn't. Fox still had the tweet active that they were searching for a Moroccan suspect a day or two later. When the Prime Minister's office notified them of the error, they corrected it within two hours. This is not "fake news" behavior.

In contrast, I have seen what passes for journalism in real "fake news" sites: two guys sitting in basements are chatting on Skype, one pulls a bizarre conspiracy idea out of his posterior with zero evidence or references to anything, the other one agrees with him and says how plausible it is, and now they are a majority of two against any individual who tells them otherwise or asks for references. :^p

---

Soon Fox News will be renamed to Trump News.

I don't get it... that wasn't a Fox News link. If you're saying Fox is a "fake news" site, it isn't even close. Sure it has a lot of "spin" and they don't try to hide or apologize for that, but all of its stories are verified and properly sourced, and they also make corrections when they are wrong (as in the link I just posted.) If we call any news we disagree with "fake news" it dilutes the term.

Another good example happened after the Montreal mosque massacre. The police initially thought one of the witnesses (a Moroccan) was a suspect due to the confusion, but quickly determined he wasn't. Fox still had the tweet active that they were searching for a Moroccan suspect a day or two later. When the Prime Minister's office notified them of the error, they corrected it within two hours. This is not "fake news" behavior.

In contrast, I have seen what passes for journalism in real "fake news" sites: two guys sitting in basements are chatting on Skype, one pulls a bizarre conspiracy idea out of his posterior with zero evidence or references to anything, the other one agrees with him and says how plausible it is, and now they are a majority of two against any individual who tells them otherwise or asks for references. :^p

Get this!
Tucker Carlson speaks out on Trump's 'Sweden' remark
http://video.foxnews.com/v/5329816498001/#sp=show-clips
Simply said Fox News are IGNORANT!

More good news from our new president.

In First 2 Months in Office: Trump Reduced Debt by $100 Billion

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/355719/

If only your link went to a reputable site and not to....

a conservative political blog founded by Jim Hoft after the United States presidential election, 2004.[2][3][4][5] It is allied with Donald Trump and elements of the alt-right and extreme right in American politics.[6][7][8][9] The website is known for publishing falsehoods and spreading hoaxes.[10][11][12][13][14][15][16]

, but it's your alternative reality isn't it?

source

Cheers.

considering https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_in_Media gave the gateway pundit and award ...

---

Tucker Carlson speaks out on Trump's 'Sweden' remark
http://video.foxnews.com/v/5329816498001/#sp=show-clips
Simply said Fox News are IGNORANT!

I don't really count Tucker Carlson as "news" ... he's a commentator on the actual, formal news stories that Fox and other outlets run. However, the mistake was a misinterpretation by Donald Trump (or his speechwriter or fact-gatherer... who knows) of Carlson's show; they even mention this in the clip as well, and they are discussing this openly and not burying it. So I wouldn't call this Fox's issue.

---

Tucker Carlson speaks out on Trump's 'Sweden' remark
http://video.foxnews.com/v/5329816498001/#sp=show-clips
Simply said Fox News are IGNORANT!

I don't really count Tucker Carlson as "news" ... he's a commentator on the actual, formal news stories that Fox and other outlets run. However, the mistake was a misinterpretation by Donald Trump (or his speechwriter or fact-gatherer... who knows) of Carlson's show; they even mention this in the clip as well, and they are discussing this openly and not burying it. So I wouldn't call this Fox's issue.

Well he is an American political news correspondent for Fox News.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tucker_Carlson
Does he know about the term "fact checking"?
Still waiting for Fox that are "discussing this openly and not burying it" to explain it further!

Trump’s claims he was wiretapped by Barack Obama and what ties the Trump team may have to Russia will be heard before Congress
Cheers.

Now live on TV (yes even in Sweden) FBI Director James Comey pressed hard to tell about the alleged interception of President Trump, and Trump employee's contacts with Russia. Now the question marks are straightened out in a hearing in the House of Representatives.
- We are investigating whether Russia has tried to influence the presidential election in 2016. The investigation also includes possible Russian links to Trump Campaign, said James Comey.

Now that's what should happen when you tell lies on the public media channels. LA Times - Fox News pulls Judge Napolitano over his Trump wiretap claims

This action needs to be repeated all the way to the top.
No excuses that Trump was only repeating what he saw or heard somewhere else. Because he also blamed a 3rd party because they, CNN, only reported on a Gallup poll, that's called doing their job. Repeating what he heard on Fox News, without checking, and he does have the biggest checking service in the world at his disposal, makes it unacceptable.

---

Rex Tillerson today confirmed yesterday's data from the Reuters news agency that he planned to skip a meeting in April in Brussels with the foreign ministers of NATO and instead receive a visit from the Chinese President Xi Jinping and then visit Russia.

But his Russian counterpart seem unaware that they are going to meet.

- I have no idea of a visit to Moscow by US Secretary of State, said Ryabkov according to the Interfax news agency.

For heaven's sake. Wake up USA.

For heaven's sake. Wake up USA.

Nothing can be done for 2 years, then the all democratic congress can impeach.

---

Where there is smoke, there is treason.

<ed>More smoke.

---

Nepotism, the job that isn't a job?

Impeachment getting closer?

America's S&P500 and Dow Jones yesterday posted their biggest one day losses since October, falling by more than one per cent amid fears the bottom has fallen out of the so-called 'Trump trade'.

Yep he'll certainly make the U.S. great again,but at what we've yet to see.

Cheers.

Wiggo, ethics never bothered Trump in the past why should they now?

---

Sadly his supporters show the same such attitudes towards them as well Betreger. :-(

Cheers.

The smoke is getting hot and thick.

---

I see that Fox News "experts" are at it again, claiming that London was shut down.

---

I see that Fox News "experts" are at it again, claiming that London was shut down.

T.F.Y media talking out of their "stinkholes" as per usual , bunch of a -holes . From what i saw on the news today thing may not be " normal" but life goes on , stop for those a - wipe terrorists and they have won

---

Life is what you make of it :-)

When i'm good i'm very good , but when i'm bad i'm shi#eloads better ;-) In't I " buttercups " p.m.s.l at authoritie !!;-)

I see that Fox News "experts" are at it again, claiming that London was shut down.

Of course they are. Such "expert news" is aimed directly at the average IQ of their audience.

---

I see that Fox News "experts" are at it again, claiming that London was shut down.

Of course they are. Such "expert news" is aimed directly at the average IQ of their audience.

Remember half of the population has an IQ below 100.

---