Message boards :
Number crunching :
APU load influence on total device throughput, MultiBeam
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3
Author | Message |
---|---|
Raistmer Send message Joined: 16 Jun 01 Posts: 6325 Credit: 106,370,077 RAC: 121 |
. Repeated - same result. With each thread pinned to own CPU (instead of letting Windows chose) full-busy Trinity APU gives best so far results though enabling GPU gives just diminishing improve. W/o affinity management GPU enabling with full-loaded CPU decreased overall throughput. SETI apps news We're not gonna fight them. We're gonna transcend them. |
Raistmer Send message Joined: 16 Jun 01 Posts: 6325 Credit: 106,370,077 RAC: 121 |
Yes, I received first bench results - so far 3 [b]pinned[b] CPU processes and 1 GPU (pinned to another left CPU) provide biggest throughput. Now need to repeat it and check 2 pinnned CPU (PC) + GPU (G) and then 2PC+2G config. Aftr finishing this experiment I post updated picture for Trinity APU. SETI apps news We're not gonna fight them. We're gonna transcend them. |
Raistmer Send message Joined: 16 Jun 01 Posts: 6325 Credit: 106,370,077 RAC: 121 |
Unfortunately, repeated run showed just same throughput as for 4CPU only. Big deviation here.and it's in CPU part. CPU throughput this time was less than just for 2 CPU active. SETI apps news We're not gonna fight them. We're gonna transcend them. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.