You are coming up sorely lacking. It is you that should stand down. BUH BYE!

Let me guess.
After your 3 post tirade against me in another thread,
you sent me a PM, and then to be petulant you placed me on ignore, so i couldn't respond.
I've seen this pattern before from you, as i suspect many others have.

Just because You attempt to teach children, does not mean you have to be one.

You are coming up sorely lacking. It is you that should stand down. BUH BYE!

Let me guess.
After your 3 post tirade against me in another thread,
you sent me a PM, and then to be petulant you placed me on ignore, so i couldn't respond.
I've seen this pattern before from you, as i suspect many others have.

Just because You attempt to teach children, does not mean you have to be one.

You've seen it before? That's an interesting statement from somebody that joined 5 days ago. Makes me wonder why you took such offense at being given a label by another poster.

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

You've seen it before? That's an interesting statement from somebody that joined 5 days ago. Makes me wonder why you took such offense at being given a label by another poster.

The simple answer, as CLYDE has repeatedly said, Social media is not conducive
to a conversation. Much better over a Beer or Latte.
I have abandoned many account. Like quitting anything. Avoid the triggers.
I have a recipe for making any Seti Account Inaccessible by it's owner.
Ozzfan once noticed i'd created a simulacrum of ID's account around Halloween and that account got banished for 25 yrs. :)
You should not believe anything i say!
But it will still be true.

You are coming up sorely lacking. It is you that should stand down. BUH BYE!

Let me guess.
After your 3 post tirade against me in another thread,
you sent me a PM, and then to be petulant you placed me on ignore, so i couldn't respond.
I've seen this pattern before from you, as i suspect many others have.

Just because You attempt to teach children, does not mean you have to be one.

You've seen it before? That's an interesting statement from somebody that joined 5 days ago. Makes me wonder why you took such offense at being given a label by another poster.

Just say buh bye to him.
See the assumptions he's making?
Teach "children"?
He's coming up not huuuge.
Buh bye, Guido.

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

Just say buh bye to him.
See the assumptions he's making?
Teach "children"?
He's coming up not huuuge.
Buh bye, Guido.

YOU have the Most Words, The Best Words, Sarge. Just huuuge.
But really we/all don't have to Fight.

Just Cut The Sarcasm.

Just say buh bye to him.
See the assumptions he's making?
Teach "children"?
He's coming up not huuuge.
Buh bye, Guido.

I will give You, Sarge, a more attractive Option.
Respond to this post with a simple "Yes" and I will never post to any of the Seti Fora again.

Batter Up.

Post something on topic or buh bye!

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

Post something on topic or buh bye!

Is that a "Yes"?

My Bad You weren't actually responding to my challenge/attractive-option.

You could banish me for Life if your petulance so dictated.

Please stop fighting with each other and get back to the topic of the thread.

---

The mind is a weird and mysterious place

Did any of you actually look around the callsafe web site or read what it actually does .....mmmmmmm or are we just knocking it because us Australians have done it again and invented something that will stop RF interference with a Human body !!!!!!

here is what the site says about the tech and how it works .

The Cellsafe® Radi Chip™ ( patent pending ) technology has been developed by an Australian RF engineer. Radi-Chips consist of multiple layers of specially formulated microwave absorbing materials, combined with a specially engineered passive directional RF coupler. The layers absorb the majority of the transmitted RF signal from the mobile phone / iPad antenna/s while the RF coupler controls and disperses the signal towards the back of the phone away from the head (iPad Radi-Chips disperse the signal towards the front of the device and away from the users lap / body). Devices which claim to act as ‘shields’ may significantly interfere with the normal operation of the phone. Reduced or redirected transmission levels caused by such shielding products can interfere with call reception and quality and may also cause calls to drop out. The Radi Chip technology has been scientifically tested and proven not to interfere with the transmission signal or with call reception, unlike these ‘shielding’ devices.

---

How many here believe everything written on the web?

---

How many here believe everything written on the web?

Well if the site is in America .....hehehhe that's a big fat NO

But in Australia we have very strong consumer laws much stronger than in America so if a company makes the claims Callsafe is making and there false or can't be proved niether the Telco's or ACCC would allow it to be used .

The Telco's are selling phones with the Callsafe chip . I only know about it from seeing the chip on many new phones sold now .

---

How many here believe everything written on the web?

Is the Electric Monk one of our readers? I'm not sure anything else could.

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

How many here believe everything written on the web?

Is the Electric Monk one of our readers? I'm not sure anything else could.

Bobby the first part of your post is very naughty of you , bad boy go stand in the corner .

But the second link is well they didn't say the case doesn't work only that you may not need one if it can be proved that Rf does not harm humans so I stick to my other post

If the site is in America That's a big fat NO. hehehehehe

---

How many here believe everything written on the web?

Is the Electric Monk one of our readers? I'm not sure anything else could.

Bobby the first part of your post is very naughty of you , bad boy go stand in the corner .

But the second link is well they didn't say the case doesn't work only that you may not need one if it can be proved that Rf does not harm humans so I stick to my other post

If the site is in America That's a big fat NO. hehehehehe

Well I'm convinced - it's in the Daily Fail so must be true.

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

How many here believe everything written on the web?

Is the Electric Monk one of our readers? I'm not sure anything else could.


Bobby the first part of your post is very naughty of you , bad boy go stand in the corner .

But the second link is well they didn't say the case doesn't work only that you may not need one if it can be proved that Rf does not harm humans so I stick to my other post

If the site is in America That's a big fat NO. hehehehehe
Well I'm convinced - it's in the Daily Fail so must be true.

Umm Bobby ummmmmmm One of them says this

Skin cancer cases increase by 46 per cent in just seven years ..????

More likely that people are not thinking when going outside as there is also a Ozone hole in the Northern hemisphere and I would say that is the reason for higher skin cancer rates as it is the reason Australia has the highest melanoma rates in the world .

And some of the other things that site says ......wow

And it's a dot .com so that would be a American site ......so I refer you to my other post about where the site is located and weather you should listen to what they say on them ....hehehehehe

---

And it's a dot .com so that would be a American site

That might be a mistake, for example philips.com, registered in 1987 for a company head-quartered in old Amsterdam, siemens.com, registered in 1986 for a company head-quartered in Berlin an Munich.

The Daily Fail is a UK publication.

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

Bobby the site you posted is a dot com but the daily mail is yes Australian so the only thing that I saw was wrong is they put the "Skin cancer cases increase by 46 per cent in just seven years " in the wrong group of mobile phones but the story it's self I would say is accurate . melanoma rates have been increasing around the world .

but nice try however the yoke I think is on you ........I also notice the Daily mail site for the actual story is a dot UK not AU so I refer you once again to my post heheheheheeh

---

Bobby the site you posted is a dot com but the daily mail is yes Australian so the only thing that I saw was wrong is they put the "Skin cancer cases increase by 46 per cent in just seven years " in the wrong group of mobile phones but the story it's self I would say is accurate . melanoma rates have been increasing around the world .

but nice try however the yoke I think is on you ........I also notice the Daily mail site for the actual story is a dot UK not AU so I refer you once again to my post heheheheheeh

Glenn, I guess you are fortunate enough to be unaware that the Daily Fail is known for claiming a thing causes cancer, and may very well claim the next day that the same thing is a cure for cancer. For example, on the page I linked (that is a collection of links to various articles in the Fail) the sections on mammograms, measles, melanotan, milk, money, and mouthwash all have "both causes and prevents cancer" articles from the Fail. While it is true that so far the site has only collected "causes" articles for mobile phones from the Fail, it may be that time will change that.

I have no idea what you found objectionable in link to the item on the Electric Monk:

The Electric Monk was a labour-saving device, like a dishwasher or a video recorder. Dishwashers washed tedious dishes for you, thus saving you the bother of washing them yourself, video recorders watched tedious television for you, thus saving you the bother of looking at it yourself; Electric Monks believed things for you, thus saving you what was becoming an increasingly onerous task, that of believing all the things the world expected you to believe.

Mine is certainly useful when dealing with the nonsense that comes from some of the posters to these fora (for instance, .com means a site is US based).

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

I have no idea what you found objectionable in link to the item on the Electric Monk

It's not objectionable I thought you where saying I believe anything I read that's why I said your a naughty boy :-)

Mine is certainly useful when dealing with the nonsense that comes from some of the posters to these fora (for instance, .com means a site is US based).

If it's .com then it's licenced to America and therefore comes under U.S law and the servers are more than likely in the U.S hence the ".com means a site is US based" even if the company that owns it is not .

We can't shutdown a .com but .au can be shutdown and seized very easliy but for a .com we would have to apply to the U.S to get it seized or shutdown

---