Monitoring inconclusive GBT validations and harvesting data for testing

Message boards : Number crunching : Monitoring inconclusive GBT validations and harvesting data for testing
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 33 · 34 · 35 · 36

AuthorMessage
Profile Raistmer
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 01
Posts: 6325
Credit: 106,370,077
RAC: 121
Russia
Message 1831986 - Posted: 23 Nov 2016, 4:16:06 UTC - in response to Message 1831985.  

Third will be SoG too so if real difference exists it will be hidden again.
Offline re-runs required.
SETI apps news
We're not gonna fight them. We're gonna transcend them.
ID: 1831986 · Report as offensive
Profile Jeff Buck Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 11 Feb 00
Posts: 1441
Credit: 148,764,870
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1833115 - Posted: 29 Nov 2016, 4:02:31 UTC

Here's one that looks interesting to me. The stock Windows CPU app, which appears to be running on a stable machine, found a pulse that my SoG r3556 didn't. The potential tiebreaker looks like it will run with the x41p_zi3j Petri special.

Workunit 2339625908 (12ja09af.10207.31262.13.40.18)
Task 5314735816 (S=10, A=4, P=1, T=0, G=0) v8.00 windows_intelx86
Task 5314735817 (S=10, A=4, P=0, T=0, G=0) SSE3xj Win32 Build 3556

(Jeez, can't even tell where the links are, at least at the time of posting. Trust me, they're there. Just wave your mouse around 'til you find them. An Easter egg hunt in November!)

On this next one, the counts are the same. The potential tiebreaker looks like it should run with Cuda42.

Workunit 2339653758 (20mr09ab.23439.316789.7.34.220)
Task 5314794045 (S=1, A=0, P=1, T=0, G=1) v8.00 windows_intelx86
Task 5314794046 (S=1, A=0, P=1, T=0, G=1) SSE3xj Win32 Build 3556

Are there any changes in r3571 that might impact these kinds of Inconclusives on my hardware? If so, I'll update. Otherwise, I'll keep running r3556 for now.
ID: 1833115 · Report as offensive
Profile Raistmer
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 01
Posts: 6325
Credit: 106,370,077
RAC: 121
Russia
Message 1833322 - Posted: 30 Nov 2016, 11:45:27 UTC - in response to Message 1833115.  

Nothing that should affect validation.
SETI apps news
We're not gonna fight them. We're gonna transcend them.
ID: 1833322 · Report as offensive
Profile Jeff Buck Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 11 Feb 00
Posts: 1441
Credit: 148,764,870
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1836429 - Posted: 17 Dec 2016, 4:29:18 UTC
Last modified: 17 Dec 2016, 5:23:04 UTC

Here's an Inconclusive WU with the new v8.20 (opencl_intel_gpu_sah) app. Both hosts appear to be reliable, but there's a pretty significant difference of opinion on this one.

Workunit 2362230258 (blc4_2bit_guppi_57424_80446_HIP9480_OFF_0004.32591.831.17.26.143.vlar)
Task 5362735823 (S=0, A=1, P=7, T=1, G=0) v8.00 (cuda42) windows_intelx86
Task 5362735824 (S=0, A=0, P=2, T=0, G=0) v8.20 (opencl_intel_gpu_sah) windows_intelx86

I've got the potential tiebreaker on one of my hosts. It's initially scheduled to run as Cuda50. However, since it's a VLAR, it might get rescheduled to run on the CPU if there's headroom in the CPU queue when that host boots back up in about half an hour. Anybody got a preference as to how it runs?

EDIT: Okay, looks like there wasn't room in the CPU queue so it's still scheduled to run as Cuda50, but probably not until late tomorrow afternoon. That means there's still plenty of time to change it if desired.
ID: 1836429 · Report as offensive
Profile jason_gee
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Nov 06
Posts: 7489
Credit: 91,093,184
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1836435 - Posted: 17 Dec 2016, 5:55:39 UTC - in response to Message 1836429.  

Could be worth adding to the pile of potential hurdles, as I wade through the alpha code (please email if you have it). Though the special apps don't have a horse in that particular race, and the problems in that look to be mostly isolated now, extra weird edge case tests could come in handy in the long run looking for more weaknesses.
"Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions.
ID: 1836435 · Report as offensive
Profile Jeff Buck Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 11 Feb 00
Posts: 1441
Credit: 148,764,870
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1836436 - Posted: 17 Dec 2016, 6:05:50 UTC - in response to Message 1836435.  

jason_gee wrote:
Could be worth adding to the pile of potential hurdles, as I wade through the alpha code (please email if you have it).
If you mean the WU file, it's still on the server so just click on the WU name link in my earlier post to d/l it.
ID: 1836436 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13736
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 1836437 - Posted: 17 Dec 2016, 6:10:08 UTC - in response to Message 1836429.  

Anybody got a preference as to how it runs?

I'd suggest CPU as that's the reference by which all others are judged.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1836437 · Report as offensive
Profile jason_gee
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Nov 06
Posts: 7489
Credit: 91,093,184
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1836438 - Posted: 17 Dec 2016, 6:13:04 UTC - in response to Message 1836436.  

jason_gee wrote:
Could be worth adding to the pile of potential hurdles, as I wade through the alpha code (please email if you have it).
If you mean the WU file, it's still on the server so just click on the WU name link in my earlier post to d/l it.

Cheers, missed that. Have quite a collection now...
"Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions.
ID: 1836438 · Report as offensive
Profile Jeff Buck Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 11 Feb 00
Posts: 1441
Credit: 148,764,870
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1836440 - Posted: 17 Dec 2016, 6:21:10 UTC - in response to Message 1836437.  

Grant (SSSF) wrote:
Anybody got a preference as to how it runs?

I'd suggest CPU as that's the reference by which all others are judged.
True, but I'm not running stock. My CPU app on that machine is SSE3xj Win32 Build 3330. I don't know whether that dilutes the "gold standard" or not.
ID: 1836440 · Report as offensive
Mike Davis
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 17 May 99
Posts: 240
Credit: 5,402,361
RAC: 0
Isle of Man
Message 1836576 - Posted: 17 Dec 2016, 21:15:17 UTC

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=2361131630 might be a worthwhile one to look at too.
ID: 1836576 · Report as offensive
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22202
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 1837344 - Posted: 22 Dec 2016, 15:35:50 UTC

One for your collection - various types tried and failed to validate:
https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=2364859374
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 1837344 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 33 · 34 · 35 · 36

Message boards : Number crunching : Monitoring inconclusive GBT validations and harvesting data for testing


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.