Message boards :
Number crunching :
Monitoring inconclusive GBT validations and harvesting data for testing
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 33 · 34 · 35 · 36
Author | Message |
---|---|
Raistmer Send message Joined: 16 Jun 01 Posts: 6325 Credit: 106,370,077 RAC: 121 |
Third will be SoG too so if real difference exists it will be hidden again. Offline re-runs required. SETI apps news We're not gonna fight them. We're gonna transcend them. |
Jeff Buck Send message Joined: 11 Feb 00 Posts: 1441 Credit: 148,764,870 RAC: 0 |
Here's one that looks interesting to me. The stock Windows CPU app, which appears to be running on a stable machine, found a pulse that my SoG r3556 didn't. The potential tiebreaker looks like it will run with the x41p_zi3j Petri special. Workunit 2339625908 (12ja09af.10207.31262.13.40.18) Task 5314735816 (S=10, A=4, P=1, T=0, G=0) v8.00 windows_intelx86 Task 5314735817 (S=10, A=4, P=0, T=0, G=0) SSE3xj Win32 Build 3556 (Jeez, can't even tell where the links are, at least at the time of posting. Trust me, they're there. Just wave your mouse around 'til you find them. An Easter egg hunt in November!) On this next one, the counts are the same. The potential tiebreaker looks like it should run with Cuda42. Workunit 2339653758 (20mr09ab.23439.316789.7.34.220) Task 5314794045 (S=1, A=0, P=1, T=0, G=1) v8.00 windows_intelx86 Task 5314794046 (S=1, A=0, P=1, T=0, G=1) SSE3xj Win32 Build 3556 Are there any changes in r3571 that might impact these kinds of Inconclusives on my hardware? If so, I'll update. Otherwise, I'll keep running r3556 for now. |
Raistmer Send message Joined: 16 Jun 01 Posts: 6325 Credit: 106,370,077 RAC: 121 |
Nothing that should affect validation. SETI apps news We're not gonna fight them. We're gonna transcend them. |
Jeff Buck Send message Joined: 11 Feb 00 Posts: 1441 Credit: 148,764,870 RAC: 0 |
Here's an Inconclusive WU with the new v8.20 (opencl_intel_gpu_sah) app. Both hosts appear to be reliable, but there's a pretty significant difference of opinion on this one. Workunit 2362230258 (blc4_2bit_guppi_57424_80446_HIP9480_OFF_0004.32591.831.17.26.143.vlar) Task 5362735823 (S=0, A=1, P=7, T=1, G=0) v8.00 (cuda42) windows_intelx86 Task 5362735824 (S=0, A=0, P=2, T=0, G=0) v8.20 (opencl_intel_gpu_sah) windows_intelx86 I've got the potential tiebreaker on one of my hosts. It's initially scheduled to run as Cuda50. However, since it's a VLAR, it might get rescheduled to run on the CPU if there's headroom in the CPU queue when that host boots back up in about half an hour. Anybody got a preference as to how it runs? EDIT: Okay, looks like there wasn't room in the CPU queue so it's still scheduled to run as Cuda50, but probably not until late tomorrow afternoon. That means there's still plenty of time to change it if desired. |
jason_gee Send message Joined: 24 Nov 06 Posts: 7489 Credit: 91,093,184 RAC: 0 |
Could be worth adding to the pile of potential hurdles, as I wade through the alpha code (please email if you have it). Though the special apps don't have a horse in that particular race, and the problems in that look to be mostly isolated now, extra weird edge case tests could come in handy in the long run looking for more weaknesses. "Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions. |
Jeff Buck Send message Joined: 11 Feb 00 Posts: 1441 Credit: 148,764,870 RAC: 0 |
jason_gee wrote: Could be worth adding to the pile of potential hurdles, as I wade through the alpha code (please email if you have it).If you mean the WU file, it's still on the server so just click on the WU name link in my earlier post to d/l it. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13736 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
Anybody got a preference as to how it runs? I'd suggest CPU as that's the reference by which all others are judged. Grant Darwin NT |
jason_gee Send message Joined: 24 Nov 06 Posts: 7489 Credit: 91,093,184 RAC: 0 |
jason_gee wrote:Could be worth adding to the pile of potential hurdles, as I wade through the alpha code (please email if you have it).If you mean the WU file, it's still on the server so just click on the WU name link in my earlier post to d/l it. Cheers, missed that. Have quite a collection now... "Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions. |
Jeff Buck Send message Joined: 11 Feb 00 Posts: 1441 Credit: 148,764,870 RAC: 0 |
Grant (SSSF) wrote: True, but I'm not running stock. My CPU app on that machine is SSE3xj Win32 Build 3330. I don't know whether that dilutes the "gold standard" or not.Anybody got a preference as to how it runs? |
Mike Davis Send message Joined: 17 May 99 Posts: 240 Credit: 5,402,361 RAC: 0 |
https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=2361131630 might be a worthwhile one to look at too. |
rob smith Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22202 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 |
One for your collection - various types tried and failed to validate: https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=2364859374 Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.