Panic Mode On (103) Server Problems?

Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (103) Server Problems?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 . . . 34 · Next

AuthorMessage
_heinz
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Feb 05
Posts: 744
Credit: 5,539,270
RAC: 0
France
Message 1809144 - Posted: 14 Aug 2016, 21:12:16 UTC

got 0 Tasks for GPU...
Does the Server not working in Berkeley?
ID: 1809144 · Report as offensive
Profile Zalster Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 May 99
Posts: 5517
Credit: 528,817,460
RAC: 242
United States
Message 1809145 - Posted: 14 Aug 2016, 21:15:55 UTC - in response to Message 1809144.  

I just got about 57 VLARs
ID: 1809145 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 1809147 - Posted: 14 Aug 2016, 21:28:32 UTC

No problems getting work here.....
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 1809147 · Report as offensive
_heinz
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Feb 05
Posts: 744
Credit: 5,539,270
RAC: 0
France
Message 1809156 - Posted: 14 Aug 2016, 22:02:34 UTC - in response to Message 1809144.  

got 0 Tasks for GPU...
Does the Server not working in Berkeley?

After a half hour I get now work again
:-)
ID: 1809156 · Report as offensive
Profile Raistmer
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 01
Posts: 6325
Credit: 106,370,077
RAC: 121
Russia
Message 1809224 - Posted: 15 Aug 2016, 5:54:56 UTC


> Hey,
>
> A '4th gen BOINC credit system' thread was created over at the official BOINC
> forums: https://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum_thread.php?id=10953
>
> There's been about 77 posts to the thread, the general consensus was that a new
> BOINC credit system is a good idea but thus far the definition/specs of such a
> next gen system has not been agreed upon.
>
> What are the BOINC dev's thoughts on this topic? I'd love to continue this
> discussion & work towards a next-gen BOINC system.
>
> Cheers guys :)


My thoughts:

1) The basic ideas behind the current credit system are sound,
but there seem to be some problems with the details,
in particular what happens when new app versions are added.

2) We need a simulator that models credit calculations for various scenarios
(synthetic, or based on trace data from a project).
Such a simulator would help identify the problems with the current system,
or would demonstrate that a new scheme works better.
I don't think we should consider a new system without simulator-based validation of it.

-- David

SETI apps news
We're not gonna fight them. We're gonna transcend them.
ID: 1809224 · Report as offensive
Profile Zalster Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 May 99
Posts: 5517
Credit: 528,817,460
RAC: 242
United States
Message 1809225 - Posted: 15 Aug 2016, 6:07:43 UTC - in response to Message 1809224.  

2) We need a simulator that models credit calculations for various scenarios
(synthetic, or based on trace data from a project).
Such a simulator would help identify the problems with the current system,
or would demonstrate that a new scheme works better.
I don't think we should consider a new system without simulator-based validation of it.

-- David


hmm....if a then b, b then c but only if a ..... yup
ID: 1809225 · Report as offensive
Profile jason_gee
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Nov 06
Posts: 7489
Credit: 91,093,184
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1809230 - Posted: 15 Aug 2016, 6:34:51 UTC - in response to Message 1809225.  

2) We need a simulator that models credit calculations for various scenarios
(synthetic, or based on trace data from a project).
Such a simulator would help identify the problems with the current system,
or would demonstrate that a new scheme works better.
I don't think we should consider a new system without simulator-based validation of it.

-- David


hmm....if a then b, b then c but only if a ..... yup



Responded there earlier:

I concur with these statements after having studied the mechanism from an engineering perspective over the last couple of years. Steady state and new host/app were observed, on seti/seti-beta, along with fresh app launch on single appversion regimen with the kind help of Albert@home staff (before me running out of resources to take the study further).

The fundamental design concepts weren't found to be problematic, though some of the implementation assumptions and choices were. Outcomes were that the dominant instabilities were (engineering) control systems related, and that characterisation of the existing system (via matching such a simulation to real-world) would aid communication of the problems and potential solutions.

What is a relatively simple engineering task of estimate localisation, is quickly conflated with passions when Credit is mentioned. That quickly mires the genuinely solvable issues in Inertia.

So In my view, progress could be made by:
- simulate the existing mechanism, under original CPU-FPUonly state, CPU-SIMD enabled state, GPU only state, and para-metrically mixed state
- Use that (refined) simulation as reference comparison to real-world, and to formalise potential practical solutions.
- Change the name from CreditNew to 'estimator'; or somesuch

"Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions.
ID: 1809230 · Report as offensive
Wedge009
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 451
Credit: 431,396,357
RAC: 553
Australia
Message 1809237 - Posted: 15 Aug 2016, 7:37:59 UTC

It turns out my connection issues appear to be related to my ISP's DNS servers. I had to manually switch to Google's public DNS servers before I could access berkeley.edu again (without having to use direct IP addresses).

Weird. I've never had this problem before...
Soli Deo Gloria
ID: 1809237 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13720
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 1809245 - Posted: 15 Aug 2016, 8:04:29 UTC - in response to Message 1809237.  

It turns out my connection issues appear to be related to my ISP's DNS servers. I had to manually switch to Google's public DNS servers before I could access berkeley.edu again (without having to use direct IP addresses).

Weird. I've never had this problem before...

I'm with one of the ISPs swallowed up by Iinet. Haven't had any issues here.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1809245 · Report as offensive
Wedge009
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 451
Credit: 431,396,357
RAC: 553
Australia
Message 1809282 - Posted: 15 Aug 2016, 12:02:35 UTC

Hmm, I'm on TPG (and have no major reason to complain). Like I said, it's weird, never happened to me before. Going by the 'last contact' times on my hosts page, looks like their DNS servers lost berekeley.edu at about 20:10 UTC on 13th August.
Soli Deo Gloria
ID: 1809282 · Report as offensive
Ulrich Metzner
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Jul 02
Posts: 1256
Credit: 13,565,513
RAC: 13
Germany
Message 1809292 - Posted: 15 Aug 2016, 12:36:12 UTC

I had similar issues with DNS with my provider 1&1. I additionally use the Google-DNS at 8.8.8.8 as the secondary DNS, so the request to Google is only spawned, if the main DNS has no entry or is not available. Using Google as main DNS seems fishy to me, because they already know more about me, than i'm comfortable with...
Aloha, Uli

ID: 1809292 · Report as offensive
Profile Mike Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 01
Posts: 34253
Credit: 79,922,639
RAC: 80
Germany
Message 1809322 - Posted: 15 Aug 2016, 13:50:17 UTC - in response to Message 1809292.  

I had similar issues with DNS with my provider 1&1. I additionally use the Google-DNS at 8.8.8.8 as the secondary DNS, so the request to Google is only spawned, if the main DNS has no entry or is not available. Using Google as main DNS seems fishy to me, because they already know more about me, than i'm comfortable with...


You can also use Comodo DNS servers.


With each crime and every kindness we birth our future.
ID: 1809322 · Report as offensive
Cosmic_Ocean
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Dec 00
Posts: 3027
Credit: 13,516,867
RAC: 13
United States
Message 1809441 - Posted: 15 Aug 2016, 19:05:44 UTC

Personally, I have Google DNS as a tertiary option. My DNS priorities are: ISP, OpenDNS (208.67.222.222), then Google (8.8.8.8).
Linux laptop:
record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up)
ID: 1809441 · Report as offensive
Wedge009
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 451
Credit: 431,396,357
RAC: 553
Australia
Message 1809493 - Posted: 16 Aug 2016, 1:16:24 UTC

Does anyone know if berkeley.edu has changed its DNS entries recently? Or maybe it's just that some DNS servers are having trouble with it for some bizarre obscure reason.
Soli Deo Gloria
ID: 1809493 · Report as offensive
Profile Zalster Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 May 99
Posts: 5517
Credit: 528,817,460
RAC: 242
United States
Message 1809761 - Posted: 17 Aug 2016, 0:16:27 UTC
Last modified: 17 Aug 2016, 0:19:38 UTC

So I've been trying to get an idea how my machines are doing by looking at FreeDC daily results but they are WAY off for the last few days.

In fact, it's saying I'm doing Fantastic at Einstein, except I stop crunching for them back on July 31...

I checked with Einstein and they have the correct values on their page, so is it just that seti isn't reporting the correct values to Free DC or what?

And it's not just 1 machine, it's across all 4 machines.

Edit..

Total combined looks ok, but individually they are all off
ID: 1809761 · Report as offensive
Al Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 1682
Credit: 477,343,364
RAC: 482
United States
Message 1809970 - Posted: 17 Aug 2016, 19:23:14 UTC

Hmm, I may be having the same issue, just came inside to the hourly (when I remember) run of the GPU-CPU swap routine, and after it restarted, I noticed that the connect time was like 7 minutes, which I thought was strange for this machine. I pulled up the event log, and this is what I saw, and the no application found, killing tasks things is also new on this one as well...


8/17/2016 2:13:36 PM | | Starting BOINC client version 7.6.22 for windows_x86_64
8/17/2016 2:13:36 PM | | log flags: file_xfer, sched_ops, task
8/17/2016 2:13:36 PM | | Libraries: libcurl/7.45.0 OpenSSL/1.0.2d zlib/1.2.8
8/17/2016 2:13:36 PM | | Data directory: C:\ProgramData\BOINC
8/17/2016 2:13:36 PM | | Running under account Flash
8/17/2016 2:13:37 PM | | CUDA: NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 1080 (driver version 368.39, CUDA version 8.0, compute capability 6.1, 4096MB, 3044MB available, 9523 GFLOPS peak)
8/17/2016 2:13:37 PM | | CUDA: NVIDIA GPU 1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti (driver version 368.39, CUDA version 8.0, compute capability 5.2, 4096MB, 3066MB available, 7271 GFLOPS peak)
8/17/2016 2:13:37 PM | | CUDA: NVIDIA GPU 2: GeForce GTX 980 Ti (driver version 368.39, CUDA version 8.0, compute capability 5.2, 4096MB, 3066MB available, 6702 GFLOPS peak)
8/17/2016 2:13:37 PM | | OpenCL: NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GTX 1080 (driver version 368.39, device version OpenCL 1.2 CUDA, 8192MB, 3044MB available, 9523 GFLOPS peak)
8/17/2016 2:13:37 PM | | OpenCL: NVIDIA GPU 1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti (driver version 368.39, device version OpenCL 1.2 CUDA, 6144MB, 3066MB available, 7271 GFLOPS peak)
8/17/2016 2:13:37 PM | | OpenCL: NVIDIA GPU 2: GeForce GTX 980 Ti (driver version 368.39, device version OpenCL 1.2 CUDA, 6144MB, 3066MB available, 6702 GFLOPS peak)
8/17/2016 2:13:37 PM | SETI@home | Found app_info.xml; using anonymous platform
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] No application found for task: windows_x86_64 710 opencl_nvidia_100; discarding
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] State file error: result 01mr09ag.22950.9888.11.38.36_0 not found for task
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] State file error: result 01mr09ag.22950.9888.11.38.122_0 not found for task
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] State file error: result 01mr09ag.22950.9888.11.38.225_0 not found for task
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] State file error: result 03no09ae.29414.250843.7.34.166_1 not found for task
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] State file error: result 01mr09ag.22950.9888.11.38.210_0 not found for task
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] State file error: result 03no09ae.29414.250843.7.34.247_1 not found for task
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] State file error: result 03no09ae.29414.250843.7.34.205_0 not found for task
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] State file error: result 01mr09ag.22950.9888.11.38.38_0 not found for task
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] State file error: result 01mr09ag.7598.24612.10.37.239_0 not found for task
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] State file error: result 01mr09ag.7598.24612.10.37.219_0 not found for task
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] State file error: result 01mr09ag.7598.24612.10.37.56_1 not found for task
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] State file error: result 03no09ae.29414.250843.7.34.207_0 not found for task
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] State file error: result 03no09ae.29414.250843.7.34.250_1 not found for task
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | [error] State file error: result 01mr09ag.22950.9888.11.38.72_0 not found for task
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | | Host name: LotzaCores
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | | Processor: 48 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2692 v2 @ 2.20GHz [Family 6 Model 62 Stepping 4]
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | | Processor features: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss htt tm pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes f16c rdrandsyscall nx lm avx vmx smx tm2 dca pbe fsgsbase smep
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | | OS: Microsoft Windows 7: Ultimate x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00)
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | | Memory: 31.97 GB physical, 63.93 GB virtual
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | | Disk: 424.70 GB total, 337.83 GB free
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | | Local time is UTC -5 hours
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Found app_config.xml
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | | Config: GUI RPCs allowed from:
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | | Zoom-PC
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | | Config: event log limit disabled
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | | Config: use all coprocessors
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | URL http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/; Computer ID 8012837; resource share 100
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | General prefs: from SETI@home (last modified 03-Apr-2013 23:59:56)
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Computer location: home
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | General prefs: no separate prefs for home; using your defaults
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | | Reading preferences override file
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | | Preferences:
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | | max memory usage when active: 16367.02MB
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | | max memory usage when idle: 31097.34MB
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | | max disk usage: 100.00GB
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | | (to change preferences, visit a project web site or select Preferences in the Manager)
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Starting task blc5_2bit_guppi_57451_68700_HIP117559_0021.12141.831.17.26.7.vlar_1
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Starting task blc5_2bit_guppi_57451_69044_HIP117559_OFF_0022.24235.416.18.27.42.vlar_1
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Starting task blc5_2bit_guppi_57451_69044_HIP117559_OFF_0022.24235.416.18.27.86.vlar_1
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Starting task blc5_2bit_guppi_57451_68700_HIP117559_0021.24845.0.17.26.3.vlar_1
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Starting task blc5_2bit_guppi_57451_69735_HIP117559_OFF_0024.25082.831.17.26.208.vlar_1
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Starting task blc5_2bit_guppi_57451_68700_HIP117559_0021.25840.831.18.27.101.vlar_0
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Starting task blc5_2bit_guppi_57451_69735_HIP117559_OFF_0024.26952.416.18.27.209.vlar_0
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Starting task blc5_2bit_guppi_57451_69387_HIP117559_0023.5323.416.18.27.197.vlar_1
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Starting task 02dc10ab.26255.221481.3.30.120.vlar_2
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Starting task blc2_2bit_guppi_57451_71786_HIP117779_OFF_0030.10252.416.17.26.137.vlar_3
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Starting task blc5_2bit_guppi_57451_68700_HIP117559_0021.28825.0.17.26.139.vlar_0
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Starting task blc5_2bit_guppi_57451_68700_HIP117559_0021.28825.0.17.26.68.vlar_1
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Starting task blc5_2bit_guppi_57451_68700_HIP117559_0021.28930.0.17.26.30.vlar_0
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Starting task blc5_2bit_guppi_57451_68700_HIP117559_0021.28930.831.17.26.93.vlar_1
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Reporting 6 completed tasks
8/17/2016 2:13:38 PM | SETI@home | Requesting new tasks for CPU and NVIDIA GPU
8/17/2016 2:13:42 PM | SETI@home | Scheduler request failed: Couldn't connect to server
8/17/2016 2:14:03 PM | SETI@home | update requested by user
8/17/2016 2:14:06 PM | | Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
8/17/2016 2:14:07 PM | SETI@home | Sending scheduler request: Requested by user.
8/17/2016 2:14:07 PM | SETI@home | Reporting 6 completed tasks
8/17/2016 2:14:07 PM | SETI@home | Requesting new tasks for CPU and NVIDIA GPU
8/17/2016 2:14:08 PM | | Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.
8/17/2016 2:14:10 PM | SETI@home | Scheduler request failed: Couldn't connect to server
8/17/2016 2:14:13 PM | | Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
8/17/2016 2:14:14 PM | | Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.


Is it me? or am I just the 1st to notice it? Obviously I can get here to post this, and I thought if the servers were down, access to the forum was down as well? Thoughts, anyone?

ID: 1809970 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11360
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1809972 - Posted: 17 Aug 2016, 19:27:01 UTC - in response to Message 1809970.  

I looks like we are sort of down.
ID: 1809972 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 . . . 34 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (103) Server Problems?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.