Electric cars - Right move?

Message boards : Politics : Electric cars - Right move?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 5 · 6 · 7 · 8

AuthorMessage
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20260
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 1784110 - Posted: 1 May 2016, 22:51:18 UTC - in response to Message 1783989.  
Last modified: 1 May 2016, 22:52:13 UTC

... The rest is waste heat.

The current F1 power units are at, or very close to 50% efficient.

Wow!

That's a lot better than all too many electricity power stations!...


All on our only one planet,
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 1784110 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30639
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1784135 - Posted: 2 May 2016, 1:09:25 UTC - in response to Message 1784110.  

... The rest is waste heat.

The current F1 power units are at, or very close to 50% efficient.

Wow!

That's a lot better than all too many electricity power stations!...

Which is what started this thread, that electric cars are not green because power stations are not green.
ID: 1784135 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1784141 - Posted: 2 May 2016, 2:37:37 UTC

What is an F1 Power unit. Formula one ?

Power plants can be quite efficient when the waste heat can be used in a steam district for heating or air conditioning or in a combined cycle, co-generation situation when the heat rejection can be assigned elsewhere. The electricity generated is almost BTU per BTU.

At the University of Illinois' Abbot Power Plant we often hit 300 percent efficiency for our steam absorption air conditioning for our 170 buildings (most of the BTU's coming from the atmosphere)
ID: 1784141 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20260
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 1784239 - Posted: 2 May 2016, 15:27:48 UTC - in response to Message 1784135.  

... The rest is waste heat.

The current F1 power units are at, or very close to 50% efficient.

Wow!

That's a lot better than all too many electricity power stations!...

Which is what started this thread, that electric cars are not green because power stations are not green.

Which is precisely why we need to get away from dirty old inefficient polluting coal, and then similarly move off all the other old fossils to instead go clean and finally totally get away from all the pollution waste...

We have the technology now.

The main hurdle is overcoming the fossils monopoly to move over investment faster to zero pollution...


All on our only one planet,
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 1784239 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19048
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 1784257 - Posted: 2 May 2016, 17:04:17 UTC - in response to Message 1784141.  
Last modified: 2 May 2016, 17:04:35 UTC

What is an F1 Power unit. Formula one ?

Power plants can be quite efficient when the waste heat can be used in a steam district for heating or air conditioning or in a combined cycle, co-generation situation when the heat rejection can be assigned elsewhere. The electricity generated is almost BTU per BTU.

At the University of Illinois' Abbot Power Plant we often hit 300 percent efficiency for our steam absorption air conditioning for our 170 buildings (most of the BTU's coming from the atmosphere)

Yes, F1 is Formula One.

For an explanation of F1 Power Unit there is this from Honda, or a 2014 one from Renault
ID: 1784257 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30639
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1784268 - Posted: 2 May 2016, 17:54:52 UTC - in response to Message 1784239.  

Which is precisely why we need to get away from dirty old inefficient polluting coal, and then similarly move off all the other old fossils to instead go clean and finally totally get away from all the pollution waste...

We have the technology now.

If we only did, but all the calculations showing we do assume that all the materials in the tech are made from zero CO2 electric, which doesn't yet exist. So as those items are deployed they actually accelerate global warming. Eventually the reality that nuclear is the only option, which is already ruled out, will sink in. While hydro is nice, just ask the salmon that can't spawn anymore. Or perhaps those extremely toxic rare earths used in wind farms that come from pit mines in China fueled by oil. Or those solar cells that only in the last year have been able to generate as much power in their lifetime as is used in their construction.

Some day you will have to come to the truth that the solution is to reduce people to reduce consumption.
ID: 1784268 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11361
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1784270 - Posted: 2 May 2016, 18:07:53 UTC - in response to Message 1784268.  

Some day you will have to come to the truth that the solution is to reduce people to reduce consumption.

We maybe seeing the start of that already. Witness the mass migrations from Africa.
ID: 1784270 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19048
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 1796759 - Posted: 17 Jun 2016, 2:32:48 UTC

LM24: Hydrogen LMP1s could enter Le Mans, WEC

LM - Le Mans, French racetrack home of the most famous 24 hour race. Takes place this weekend starting Saturday 13:00 UTC
LMP - Le Mans prototype
WEC - World Endurance Cars - usually ≥1000kms or ≥6 hour racing
ID: 1796759 · Report as offensive
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 3387
Credit: 4,182,900
RAC: 10
United States
Message 1796775 - Posted: 17 Jun 2016, 4:05:23 UTC

How "green" is the making of the batteries?
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.
ID: 1796775 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30639
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1796781 - Posted: 17 Jun 2016, 4:18:34 UTC - in response to Message 1796775.  

How "green" is the making of the batteries?

Better define "green" Just CO2 or total environmental factors considering regulation or lack where they are made?
ID: 1796781 · Report as offensive
Darth Beaver Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 99
Posts: 6728
Credit: 21,443,075
RAC: 3
Australia
Message 1796783 - Posted: 17 Jun 2016, 4:43:21 UTC

How many Gallons of fuel does a petrol engine USE ..

How much CO2 does it make ?

And comparing a Race with normal family motor and how long and Gallons of fuel it would use in it's lifetime compared with a Race is well dubious

Compare the lifespan of the Family Motor to ..

Batteries ? ... allowing for new break throughs in Battery Tech

Electric Cars are looking much better now .
ID: 1796783 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19048
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 1796784 - Posted: 17 Jun 2016, 4:48:25 UTC - in response to Message 1796775.  

How "green" is the making of the batteries?

Not a clue. I only posted the link because others where interested in alternative fuels.

I personally don't like batteries, but admit they are essential and at the moment and probably the best solution, at the moment, for storing temporary energy in energy recovery systems. But would like to see more development on flywheels, but think they might not make it because of the weight of the flywheel itself and the enclosure it is in.

My vote at this moment in time would be for a F1 style power unit built for longevity and economy fueled by LPG.
ID: 1796784 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 34744
Credit: 261,360,520
RAC: 489
Australia
Message 1796801 - Posted: 17 Jun 2016, 6:56:08 UTC - in response to Message 1796784.  

How "green" is the making of the batteries?

Not a clue. I only posted the link because others where interested in alternative fuels.

I personally don't like batteries, but admit they are essential and at the moment and probably the best solution, at the moment, for storing temporary energy in energy recovery systems. But would like to see more development on flywheels, but think they might not make it because of the weight of the flywheel itself and the enclosure it is in.

My vote at this moment in time would be for a F1 style power unit built for longevity and economy fueled by LPG.

Oh yes, 13+:1 compression ratio engines + electric boost from harvested braking and heat sources, why not?

If only I could get that on in a Japanese sports/touring motorcycle frame. :-D

Cheers.
ID: 1796801 · Report as offensive
Darth Beaver Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 99
Posts: 6728
Credit: 21,443,075
RAC: 3
Australia
Message 1797007 - Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 4:34:56 UTC - in response to Message 1796801.  

If only I could get that on in a Japanese sports/touring motorcycle frame. :-D


Wiggo mate aren't you getting a bit old for Motor bikes :-)

Or your thinking of becoming a Grey Nomad on a trike , there are a few doing that now :-)
ID: 1797007 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 1797009 - Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 4:39:32 UTC
Last modified: 18 Jun 2016, 4:41:36 UTC

I cannot find it right now, but I believe there was an article on an enhanced version of possibly the Stirling cycle motor that was purported to be able to cross the USA on 28 gallons of gas?

It was, of course used to generate electricity to power the actual motors that moved the car.

Still looking for it.
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 1797009 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30639
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1797015 - Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 5:01:47 UTC - in response to Message 1797009.  

I cannot find it right now, but I believe there was an article on an enhanced version of possibly the Stirling cycle motor that was purported to be able to cross the USA on 28 gallons of gas?

It was, of course used to generate electricity to power the actual motors that moved the car.

Still looking for it.

If you travel slow enough you don't have wind resistance and with the right tires you can cut road friction a lot, but it isn't a trip on the interstate with air conditioning! Also they may have calculated it for flat ground and not going over the Rocky Mountains.

Some of those solar cars can do amazing feats, but they aren't a comfortable ride. Oh they can do it on zero gasoline. I sure wouldn't want to take one out in Manhattan traffic!
ID: 1797015 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 1797024 - Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 5:15:21 UTC - in response to Message 1797015.  

I cannot find it right now, but I believe there was an article on an enhanced version of possibly the Stirling cycle motor that was purported to be able to cross the USA on 28 gallons of gas?

It was, of course used to generate electricity to power the actual motors that moved the car.

Still looking for it.

If you travel slow enough you don't have wind resistance and with the right tires you can cut road friction a lot, but it isn't a trip on the interstate with air conditioning! Also they may have calculated it for flat ground and not going over the Rocky Mountains.

Some of those solar cars can do amazing feats, but they aren't a comfortable ride. Oh they can do it on zero gasoline. I sure wouldn't want to take one out in Manhattan traffic!

It had nothing to do with solar.....
Petroleum powered.
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 1797024 · Report as offensive
Darth Beaver Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 99
Posts: 6728
Credit: 21,443,075
RAC: 3
Australia
Message 1797039 - Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 6:02:34 UTC
Last modified: 18 Jun 2016, 6:04:07 UTC

Kittyman I just did some calculations and there seems to already be Bikes that can give approx. 80 miles per gallon and you would need that amount or slightly more to cross the States on 28 gallons

Check this link out as it compares fuel consumption and you can look back to the 1930's all the way up to 2017(spose there the ones being released next year)

http://www.totalmotorcycle.com/MotorcycleFuelEconomyGuide/

Just click on the year and a new page will show the mileage in MILES not Klm
ID: 1797039 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30639
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1797062 - Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 7:14:15 UTC - in response to Message 1797039.  

Kittyman I just did some calculations and there seems to already be Bikes that can give approx. 80 miles per gallon and you would need that amount or slightly more to cross the States on 28 gallons

Check this link out as it compares fuel consumption and you can look back to the 1930's all the way up to 2017(spose there the ones being released next year)

http://www.totalmotorcycle.com/MotorcycleFuelEconomyGuide/

Just click on the year and a new page will show the mileage in MILES not Klm

Seattle WA to Miami FL about 3300 miles @ 80 MPG = 41.25 Gal
So 50% more is "slightly more" Got your thinking.
ID: 1797062 · Report as offensive
Darth Beaver Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 99
Posts: 6728
Credit: 21,443,075
RAC: 3
Australia
Message 1797067 - Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 7:28:03 UTC - in response to Message 1797062.  

Seattle WA to Miami FL about 3300 miles @ 80 MPG = 41.25 Gal
So 50% more is "slightly more" Got your thinking.


Well no your wrong there I did assume from east coast to west was about 2500 not 3,000 and approx. 80-95 would do appox 2660 so just a miscalculation on how wide the country is

110 = 3080 miles so I wasn't that far wrong

So cut the aggression please not warranted or called for I was agreeing with the kittyman and trying to post something that may help him in what he was looking for .
ID: 1797067 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 5 · 6 · 7 · 8

Message boards : Politics : Electric cars - Right move?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.