v8 Resend Tasks

Message boards : Number crunching : v8 Resend Tasks
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Brent Norman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 99
Posts: 2786
Credit: 685,657,289
RAC: 835
Canada
Message 1772335 - Posted: 18 Mar 2016, 4:55:57 UTC

Is it just me, or is there more seeing a lot of v8 resends coming though?

I see around 15 - 20 % of new tasks are resends.

Maybe it's the luck of the draw, or "new" apps kicking errors.

Not sure I haven't had the time to look.
ID: 1772335 · Report as offensive
Profile jason_gee
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Nov 06
Posts: 7489
Credit: 91,093,184
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1772342 - Posted: 18 Mar 2016, 5:15:14 UTC - in response to Message 1772335.  
Last modified: 18 Mar 2016, 5:26:35 UTC

As a rough (aggregate) estimate of health of the project applications as a whole, and my own systems/apps, I like to use #Inconclusive/#pending , and aim in app development for lower than 5%. Inconclusives naturally would be someone's resends.

My current systems work out to 2.5% (Mac), 4.8% (Win), and 5% (Linux) with the same Cuda code and no errors/invalids, so in the ballpark.

This proportion of inconclusives is generally lower than under v7 (~10% with healthy system+apps) and v6 (~15-20% with healthy system and apps)

In other words, on a statistical level, I'd guess your perceived preponderance of resends may be luck of the draw with respect to when your host(s) requested work, what was going through validation, and reentering the feeder queue (as opposed to initial replication straight from the splitter).

There are some dicey stock Mac apps, and experimental Cuda builds circulating, though in general the app quality (and so project efficiency) has risen, with setiathome_v8.
"Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions.
ID: 1772342 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : v8 Resend Tasks


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.