SpaceX, successful launch, but a crash landing

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : SpaceX, successful launch, but a crash landing
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30640
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1797161 - Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 15:48:00 UTC - in response to Message 1797042.  

Someone building shuttle engines after everyone has decided the shuttle concept is dead


Just from that comment you have not watched the link . Nothing to do with the shuttle , it was a different project called H.O.T.O.L and it wer'nt a American project either

I watched. You missed the SSTO in the vid. SSTO = shuttle!
ID: 1797161 · Report as offensive
Mark Stevenson Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 11
Posts: 1736
Credit: 174,899,165
RAC: 91
United Kingdom
Message 1797166 - Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 15:56:42 UTC - in response to Message 1797161.  
Last modified: 18 Jun 2016, 15:57:16 UTC

Na i Didn't miss that just the engine they are deleloping has got F.A to do with the shuttle . H.O.T.O.L different project entirely
Life is what you make of it :-)

When i'm good i'm very good , but when i'm bad i'm shi#eloads better ;-) In't I " buttercups " p.m.s.l at authoritie !!;-)
ID: 1797166 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30640
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1797259 - Posted: 18 Jun 2016, 22:04:43 UTC - in response to Message 1797166.  

Na i Didn't miss that just the engine they are deleloping has got F.A to do with the shuttle . H.O.T.O.L different project entirely

The only thing it could be for is a shuttle. Not THE SHUTTLE but a shuttle.
ID: 1797259 · Report as offensive
Darth Beaver Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 99
Posts: 6728
Credit: 21,443,075
RAC: 3
Australia
Message 1797493 - Posted: 20 Jun 2016, 4:03:36 UTC - in response to Message 1797259.  

Gary the engine will mean it will take off like a normal jet .

No external fuel tanks needed or solid rocket boosters so the things you have said will not be a problem .

I would also say the Poms build stuff better and engineer things better than America . You lot let the profit argument interfere with things and that's why the Shuttle had it's problems, cost cutting and trying to do things on the Cheap

Pity even with the accidents it was still a great machine and more reliable than Space -X 's efforts so far and did keep America on top when it came to Space .. not now thou
ID: 1797493 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : SpaceX, successful launch, but a crash landing


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.