RIP Antonin Scalia

Author	Message
Sarge Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Aug 99 Posts: 12273 Credit: 8,569,109 RAC: 79	Message 1779387 - Posted: 15 Apr 2016, 20:18:46 UTC - in response to Message 1778373. Or am I missing simething? Yes. Elsewhere it is provided that the President can make appointments when the Senate is in adjournment. The Senate isn't that dumb. Smart enough to not take vacations until Trump is sworn in? :) Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes. ID: 1779387 ·

Sarge Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Aug 99 Posts: 12273 Credit: 8,569,109 RAC: 79	Message 1779388 - Posted: 15 Apr 2016, 20:19:52 UTC - in response to Message 1778434. Or am I missing simething? Yes. Elsewhere it is provided that the President can make appointments when the Senate is in adjournment. The Senate isn't that dumb. Recently, the Senate never goes into adjournment. Obama made appointments, when most members were out of Washington. When the Senate stated they were still In Session. SCOTUS ruled correctly, that only the Senate could say when they were in adjournment. And the Unconstitutional Appointments were vacated. In the USA. A President has no power, or authority, over another Branch of Government. Nor can tell it how to do its business. Bet they paid themselves while not technically adjourned. Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes. ID: 1779388 ·

Gary Charpentier Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30651 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32	Message 1779407 - Posted: 15 Apr 2016, 21:19:06 UTC - in response to Message 1779388. Or am I missing simething? Yes. Elsewhere it is provided that the President can make appointments when the Senate is in adjournment. The Senate isn't that dumb. Recently, the Senate never goes into adjournment. Obama made appointments, when most members were out of Washington. When the Senate stated they were still In Session. SCOTUS ruled correctly, that only the Senate could say when they were in adjournment. And the Unconstitutional Appointments were vacated. In the USA. A President has no power, or authority, over another Branch of Government. Nor can tell it how to do its business. Bet they paid themselves while not technically adjourned. They get paid if they never gavel themselves into a session. ID: 1779407 ·

Sarge Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Aug 99 Posts: 12273 Credit: 8,569,109 RAC: 79	Message 1779430 - Posted: 15 Apr 2016, 22:49:52 UTC - in response to Message 1779407. Or am I missing simething? Yes. Elsewhere it is provided that the President can make appointments when the Senate is in adjournment. The Senate isn't that dumb. Recently, the Senate never goes into adjournment. Obama made appointments, when most members were out of Washington. When the Senate stated they were still In Session. SCOTUS ruled correctly, that only the Senate could say when they were in adjournment. And the Unconstitutional Appointments were vacated. In the USA. A President has no power, or authority, over another Branch of Government. Nor can tell it how to do its business. Bet they paid themselves while not technically adjourned. They get paid if they never gavel themselves into a session. And then pat themselves on the back believing they work hard, represent hard-working people and are doing things that allow us to rise? Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes. ID: 1779430 ·

bobby Send message Joined: 22 Mar 02 Posts: 2866 Credit: 17,789,109 RAC: 3	Message 1779594 - Posted: 16 Apr 2016, 12:47:03 UTC - in response to Message 1779515. Or am I missing simething? Yes. Elsewhere it is provided that the President can make appointments when the Senate is in adjournment. The Senate isn't that dumb. Recently, the Senate never goes into adjournment. Obama made appointments, when most members were out of Washington. When the Senate stated they were still In Session. SCOTUS ruled correctly, that only the Senate could say when they were in adjournment. And the Unconstitutional Appointments were vacated. In the USA. A President has no power, or authority, over another Branch of Government. Nor can tell it how to do its business. Bet they paid themselves while not technically adjourned. They get paid if they never gavel themselves into a session. And then pat themselves on the back believing they work hard, represent hard-working people and are doing things that allow us to rise? Doubt they really believe that. It is their job making us believe that. And yes... They are laughing all the way to the bank. Perhaps not laughing their way. I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ... ID: 1779594 ·

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.