It seems that all my inconclusives on this computer: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=7844250&offset=0&show_names=0&state=3&appid= are against Apple/Darwin computers. Some show differing results, some show the same results with differing stats somewhere.
I was just wondering if there is something in the programing that is causing this? or this normal?

---

SETI@home classic workunits 4,019
SETI@home classic CPU time 34,348 hours

Precision is markedly higher in v8, and it seems as though the standard apple build isn't quite as close as most other builds. I wouldn't be overly concerned, since your inconclusive to pending ratio is well below 5%, so in general, despite that particular build/platform possible needing some tweaking down the road, overall project health appears higher than under v6 and v7 (in terms of cross platform/device match with many applications, and higher precision)

---

"Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions.

It seems that all my inconclusives on this computer: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=7844250&offset=0&show_names=0&state=3&appid= are against Apple/Darwin computers.

Mot of mine are against Apple/Darwin systems, however I've now got a few against CUDA42 & open_cl_Intel GPUs as well.

---

Grant
Darwin NT