v7 WUs "Validation pending"

Message boards : Number crunching : v7 WUs "Validation pending"
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
AMDave
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Mar 01
Posts: 234
Credit: 11,671,730
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1756369 - Posted: 14 Jan 2016, 18:56:22 UTC

On my account, there are 41 WUs listed as "Validation pending", and all are v7. Would it be correct to surmise that this group will never be validated and time out b/c v7 is in the history books? Or, will they timeout and be resent for validation?
ID: 1756369 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6534
Credit: 196,805,888
RAC: 57
United States
Message 1756370 - Posted: 14 Jan 2016, 18:59:09 UTC - in response to Message 1756369.  
Last modified: 14 Jan 2016, 19:00:41 UTC

On my account, there are 41 WUs listed as "Validation pending", and all are v7. Would it be correct to surmise that this group will never be validated and time out b/c v7 is in the history books? Or, will they timeout and be resent for validation?

While not new SETI@home v7 MB tasks may be created the ones currently out will still follow the process to be completed.
Currently for v7 MB we are looking at:
Results out in the field 959,603
Results returned and awaiting validation 1,086,421
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
ID: 1756370 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14650
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 1756371 - Posted: 14 Jan 2016, 18:59:52 UTC - in response to Message 1756369.  

They'll time out and be resent. Even after the next Lunatics installer is released, and more people move on to v8 processing, it will still contain applications compatible with v7 precisely to pick up these waifs and strays on re-release.
ID: 1756371 · Report as offensive
AMDave
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Mar 01
Posts: 234
Credit: 11,671,730
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1756603 - Posted: 15 Jan 2016, 16:40:50 UTC - in response to Message 1756371.  
Last modified: 15 Jan 2016, 16:43:11 UTC

Thanks gents. I should have viewed the Server Status page.
I did find something odd though. On one of the Validation Pending WUs on my account, this one https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1994343051 is listed as "In progress" on this host https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=7575901. The odd part is that out of the 241 WUs listed as "In progress", virtually all of them were sent on 12/08/15. Is this the result of the host deselecting the running of v7?
ID: 1756603 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6534
Credit: 196,805,888
RAC: 57
United States
Message 1756609 - Posted: 15 Jan 2016, 16:51:30 UTC - in response to Message 1756603.  

Thanks gents. I should have viewed the Server Status page.
I did find something odd though. On one of the Validation Pending WUs on my account, this one https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1994343051 is listed as "In progress" on this host https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=7575901. The odd part is that out of the 241 WUs listed as "In progress", virtually all of them were sent on 12/08/15. Is this the result of the host deselecting the running of v7?

It is more likely that since the v8 app is new the estimated run times would be very high. Which will cause BOINC to process them first. As it thinks there isn't enough time to get them done before their deadline. Once that host has a good estimated completion time or finishes all of its v8 tasks it should get back to running FIFO and push out all of the v7 tasks.
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
ID: 1756609 · Report as offensive
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22199
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 1756610 - Posted: 15 Jan 2016, 16:52:15 UTC

That sort of thing happens every now and then. It may be that there was a server glitch just as the tasks were on their way and have never reached the client resulting in a large number of "ghosts".
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 1756610 · Report as offensive
Speedy
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Jun 04
Posts: 1643
Credit: 12,921,799
RAC: 89
New Zealand
Message 1756764 - Posted: 16 Jan 2016, 3:05:25 UTC

With just over 1,018,000 results out in the field by my calculations there is currently 128,997 results that need to be recent at some point. I will do my best to get some resends on my 970 GPU
ID: 1756764 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11361
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1756765 - Posted: 16 Jan 2016, 3:10:50 UTC

Resends are good.
ID: 1756765 · Report as offensive
Speedy
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Jun 04
Posts: 1643
Credit: 12,921,799
RAC: 89
New Zealand
Message 1756767 - Posted: 16 Jan 2016, 3:22:22 UTC - in response to Message 1756765.  
Last modified: 16 Jan 2016, 3:28:50 UTC

Resends are good.

Yes for 2 reasons wonder we are helping clean out the database and 2 we get credit quicker. I am completely aware it is not all about the credit it is about the science.

Edit = while I was writing I picked up one resend. It had been out in the field since November all returned and credited
ID: 1756767 · Report as offensive
Un4given Project Donor

Send message
Joined: 1 May 04
Posts: 19
Credit: 7,983,035
RAC: 13
United States
Message 1757381 - Posted: 19 Jan 2016, 1:36:06 UTC
Last modified: 19 Jan 2016, 1:36:35 UTC

Wait a minute. I've always had CPU tasks running on SETI because the system could never keep my systems supplied with GPU units. Are you saying the hundreds of hours of CPU processing time my files are showing as "Pending" are basically worthless and are just simply going to be redistributed?

WTF CHUCK!
ID: 1757381 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 1757382 - Posted: 19 Jan 2016, 1:42:19 UTC - in response to Message 1757381.  
Last modified: 19 Jan 2016, 1:43:39 UTC

Wait a minute. I've always had CPU tasks running on SETI because the system could never keep my systems supplied with GPU units. Are you saying the hundreds of hours of CPU processing time my files are showing as "Pending" are basically worthless and are just simply going to be redistributed?

WTF CHUCK!

Not worthless, my friend.
May take a LONG time to come back, but eventually all v7 wus should be validated.
There shall be many out in the field for months to come, so don't wait for the impending validations to arrive.
I am in WU hell right now, as almost all of the v7 tasks I have remaining are CPU tasks.........including APs, and they take a LONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNG time to do on a CPU.

No worries. GPU apps are coming soon, and then things shall start to slide upwards.

v8 vrooooooooooooooooooooooom say the kitties.
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 1757382 · Report as offensive
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 1757406 - Posted: 19 Jan 2016, 4:21:07 UTC
Last modified: 19 Jan 2016, 4:24:19 UTC

I have 8 v8 tasks in validation pending on my Linux laptop, not a fast machine, plus two with validation inconclusive on a Linux guest on the Windows 10 host.with one still processing. Of the two v7 tasks, one was aborted on the Windows 10, it took too much time, and the other is pending on a Linux host. 9 pending on a total of 14, all CPU.
Tullio
ID: 1757406 · Report as offensive
Un4given Project Donor

Send message
Joined: 1 May 04
Posts: 19
Credit: 7,983,035
RAC: 13
United States
Message 1757422 - Posted: 19 Jan 2016, 5:13:56 UTC - in response to Message 1757382.  

I hope you're correct. As I said, this program has never been able to keep my GPUs busy, so I've always run CPU tasks to keep my multiple, multi-core CPU systems busy, and the stuff that has been showing as pending is now getting quite old, and represents hundreds of CPU hours. I would be highly disappointed to find out that work was all for not.
ID: 1757422 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13736
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 1757433 - Posted: 19 Jan 2016, 6:42:32 UTC - in response to Message 1757381.  

I've always had CPU tasks running on SETI because the system could never keep my systems supplied with GPU units.

Other than a few system outages & the weekly outages others haven't had any issues keeping their GPUs busy with Seti work.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1757433 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 34744
Credit: 261,360,520
RAC: 489
Australia
Message 1757455 - Posted: 19 Jan 2016, 11:10:37 UTC - in response to Message 1757433.  

I've always had CPU tasks running on SETI because the system could never keep my systems supplied with GPU units.

Other than a few system outages & the weekly outages others haven't had any issues keeping their GPUs busy with Seti work.

Yep, until the seti V8 app changeover they've kept my GPU's fed 99% of the time.

But ATM those GPU's are doing a backup project of mine for the mean time until an optimized installer is released (I can wait). ;-)

Cheers.
ID: 1757455 · Report as offensive
Profile John Neale
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 00
Posts: 634
Credit: 7,246,513
RAC: 9
South Africa
Message 1757458 - Posted: 19 Jan 2016, 12:14:14 UTC - in response to Message 1757422.  

I hope you're correct. As I said, this program has never been able to keep my GPUs busy, so I've always run CPU tasks to keep my multiple, multi-core CPU systems busy, and the stuff that has been showing as pending is now getting quite old, and represents hundreds of CPU hours. I would be highly disappointed to find out that work was all for not.

I've estimated the total run time for the 17-odd SETI@home v7 tasks on your three machines that are either pending or inconclusive, and it comes to about 12 hours of computing time.

They will eventually be validated, but it could take many weeks, months even, for the last few to be processed and cleared. (SETI@home v6 took from 24 July to 7 December 2013 to decrease from 16,903 to 0 outstanding results. The last 1,000 results took from 31 August 2013 to clear.)
ID: 1757458 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6534
Credit: 196,805,888
RAC: 57
United States
Message 1757509 - Posted: 19 Jan 2016, 22:29:25 UTC - in response to Message 1757458.  

I hope you're correct. As I said, this program has never been able to keep my GPUs busy, so I've always run CPU tasks to keep my multiple, multi-core CPU systems busy, and the stuff that has been showing as pending is now getting quite old, and represents hundreds of CPU hours. I would be highly disappointed to find out that work was all for not.

I've estimated the total run time for the 17-odd SETI@home v7 tasks on your three machines that are either pending or inconclusive, and it comes to about 12 hours of computing time.

They will eventually be validated, but it could take many weeks, months even, for the last few to be processed and cleared. (SETI@home v6 took from 24 July to 7 December 2013 to decrease from 16,903 to 0 outstanding results. The last 1,000 results took from 31 August 2013 to clear.)

They seem to be complaining only about their pending v7 CPU tasks. The run time for their 5 pending CPU tasks do add up.... to exactly 39173.94 seconds or about 10.88 hours.
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
ID: 1757509 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : v7 WUs "Validation pending"


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.