Another example of USA Gun Laws (or lack of...)?

Message boards : Politics : Another example of USA Gun Laws (or lack of...)?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 . . . 234 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30639
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1799426 - Posted: 29 Jun 2016, 18:50:30 UTC - in response to Message 1799421.  

Yes all that lovely $$$ to reinvest in science, education & guns :-)

It already is invested in guns, so no change.
ID: 1799426 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20265
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 1799433 - Posted: 29 Jun 2016, 19:17:36 UTC - in response to Message 1799412.  

Stop living in the past. Look to the future (if possible).


That is the one good comment seen so far.


How do we persuade/encourage people to make a better future for us all?


All in our only one world,
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 1799433 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile janneseti
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 09
Posts: 14106
Credit: 655,366
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 1799440 - Posted: 29 Jun 2016, 19:31:30 UTC - in response to Message 1799426.  
Last modified: 29 Jun 2016, 19:38:48 UTC

Yes all that lovely $$$ to reinvest in science, education & guns :-)

It already is invested in guns, so no change.

We think the US need more.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_Bofors_Dynamics
http://saabgroup.com/
ID: 1799440 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile j mercer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Jun 99
Posts: 2422
Credit: 12,323,733
RAC: 1
United States
Message 1799442 - Posted: 29 Jun 2016, 19:44:56 UTC - in response to Message 1799433.  

Stop living in the past. Look to the future (if possible).


That is the one good comment seen so far.

How do we persuade/encourage people to make a better future for us all?

All in our only one world,
Martin

How about stop ragging on each other for a start.

"You get more flies with honey than vinegar."

;^)
...
ID: 1799442 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Siran d'Vel'nahr
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 May 99
Posts: 7379
Credit: 44,181,323
RAC: 238
United States
Message 1799484 - Posted: 29 Jun 2016, 21:56:35 UTC - in response to Message 1799406.  

Fine Bernie, you go right ahead and dismiss the statistics I linked to. You get no argument from me. :)
CAPT Siran d'Vel'nahr - L L & P _\\//
Winders 11 OS? "What a piece of junk!" - L. Skywalker
"Logic is the cement of our civilization with which we ascend from chaos using reason as our guide." - T'Plana-hath
ID: 1799484 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Darth Beaver Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 99
Posts: 6728
Credit: 21,443,075
RAC: 3
Australia
Message 1799491 - Posted: 29 Jun 2016, 22:12:00 UTC

how many people could you kill in one go with a hammer

1

How many with a car maybe

12 max dead same injuired

how many with a Assault Rifle ummmmmm

Last count mmm 49 dead 54 injured

most ppl die in cars from accidents are not deliberately run down and targeted

and where hammers or knifes are used it's usually something of a personal nature not a planed mas killing and you can arm your self with a hand gun not a weapon of mass murder like a Assault rifle
ID: 1799491 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15691
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 1799492 - Posted: 29 Jun 2016, 22:14:10 UTC - in response to Message 1799484.  

Bernie addressed your statistics quite clearly. His point was that you're comparing items with truly accident deaths (things which weren't designed with the purpose of killing) to the death caused by guns, and item which was designed with the sole intent to harm or kill.

And before I get accused of choosing sides by way of attacking your argument, I'm not necessarily in favor of more gun control since I acknowledge that only increases black market sales, and making it harder for law-abiding citizens to get firearms only means criminals simply won't care what laws are put in place.

2nd amendment advocates need to get better arguments than the "statistics" you used, or constantly telling the rest of the world to mind their own business.

BTW - Good to see I'm not the only one you cop an attitude with. Now I know it wasn't a problem with me. You have a problem with anyone that has an opinion counter to your own or corrects you on your false or untrue claims.
ID: 1799492 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30639
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1799494 - Posted: 29 Jun 2016, 22:23:34 UTC - in response to Message 1799484.  

Fine Bernie, you go right ahead and dismiss the statistics I linked to. You get no argument from me. :)

I think he got the answers to his questions wrong, except for cars.

Knives were designed for hunting, even if they were chipped out of rock, so the answer is yes.

Hammers, call them clubs and it is obvious what they are and they were designed for hunting, so the answer is yes. (even other primates use them this way)

Guns, unless paper targets are alive, the answer is no.

Now that we understand the one item not design for killing, the car, is the only item that requires a test on the laws of using it and a test in the operation of it, we can begin to see how society treats itself.

I think we all don't want crazy people to have any of these instruments. So work on getting the law changed so mental health professionals report crazy people to a database that can be searched to keep crazy people from these instruments.
ID: 1799494 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Darth Beaver Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 99
Posts: 6728
Credit: 21,443,075
RAC: 3
Australia
Message 1799497 - Posted: 29 Jun 2016, 22:35:33 UTC - in response to Message 1799494.  
Last modified: 29 Jun 2016, 22:37:09 UTC


I think we all don't want crazy people to have any of these instruments. So work on getting the law changed so mental health professionals report crazy people to a database that can be searched to keep crazy people from these instruments


Gary that type of argument is also part of the problem .

It would go against other rights in the Constitution and is not do able and is probably worse than going against the 2nd .

Where the NRA have gone wrong now was objecting to the police checks as it now clearly shows there not trying to protect the 2nd but protect the gun makers .

Compromise on things like gun checks and licences or risk losing the whole argument over weapons

do the math

400,000 per yrs x 50 years of memory's of humans = 20 million victims add a trend of mass murder and the number will explode and there goes the 2nd and all the guns at some point not to far away from now if the Mass Murder doesn't stop and that's not even counting moderates that will also call for banning of modern weapons

Grow Up and protect the right to own guns by compromising on some small issues that will help and let the Hoopla die down
ID: 1799497 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30639
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1799499 - Posted: 29 Jun 2016, 22:48:29 UTC - in response to Message 1799497.  


I think we all don't want crazy people to have any of these instruments. So work on getting the law changed so mental health professionals report crazy people to a database that can be searched to keep crazy people from these instruments


Gary that type of argument is also part of the problem .

It would go against other rights in the Constitution and is not do able and is probably worse than going against the 2nd .

Can you enumerate where that right you think it goes against is locate in the Constitution? I don't think you can. The prohibition is in an ordinary law, Title II of HIPAA.
ID: 1799499 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Darth Beaver Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 99
Posts: 6728
Credit: 21,443,075
RAC: 3
Australia
Message 1799503 - Posted: 29 Jun 2016, 23:02:22 UTC - in response to Message 1799499.  



I think we all don't want crazy people to have any of these instruments. So work on getting the law changed so mental health professionals report crazy people to a database that can be searched to keep crazy people from these instruments


Gary that type of argument is also part of the problem .

It would go against other rights in the Constitution and is not do able and is probably worse than going against the 2nd .
Can you enumerate where that right you think it goes against is locate in the Constitution? I don't think you can. The prohibition is in an ordinary law, Title II of HIPAA.


Doesn't go against your right that the government can't tell your citizens what to do ?

Ergo : report someone whose dangerous from the medical profession ? Hospitals , Head shrinks , rehab

dear I say it "that dag flipping constitution gets in the way all the dang time"
ID: 1799503 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30639
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1799507 - Posted: 29 Jun 2016, 23:10:10 UTC - in response to Message 1799503.  



I think we all don't want crazy people to have any of these instruments. So work on getting the law changed so mental health professionals report crazy people to a database that can be searched to keep crazy people from these instruments


Gary that type of argument is also part of the problem .

It would go against other rights in the Constitution and is not do able and is probably worse than going against the 2nd .
Can you enumerate where that right you think it goes against is locate in the Constitution? I don't think you can. The prohibition is in an ordinary law, Title II of HIPAA.


Doesn't go against your right that the government can't tell your citizens what to do ?

What section is that in? Quote it to me. Since you now seem to be an authority on the US Constitution.

Hint, government does tell citizens they must stop at a stop sign.
ID: 1799507 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile j mercer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Jun 99
Posts: 2422
Credit: 12,323,733
RAC: 1
United States
Message 1799511 - Posted: 29 Jun 2016, 23:21:20 UTC - in response to Message 1799503.  

dear I say it "that dag flipping constitution gets in the way all the dang time"

Yep it protects us from tyrants. Hmmm lots of those about mate. ;)

Full Definition of tyrant

a : an absolute ruler unrestrained by law or constitution
b : a usurper of sovereignty

a : a ruler who exercises absolute power oppressively or brutally
b : one resembling an oppressive ruler in the harsh use of authority or power
...
ID: 1799511 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Darth Beaver Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 99
Posts: 6728
Credit: 21,443,075
RAC: 3
Australia
Message 1799512 - Posted: 29 Jun 2016, 23:28:24 UTC - in response to Message 1799507.  




I think we all don't want crazy people to have any of these instruments. So work on getting the law changed so mental health professionals report crazy people to a database that can be searched to keep crazy people from these instruments


Gary that type of argument is also part of the problem .

It would go against other rights in the Constitution and is not do able and is probably worse than going against the 2nd .
Can you enumerate where that right you think it goes against is locate in the Constitution? I don't think you can. The prohibition is in an ordinary law, Title II of HIPAA.


Doesn't go against your right that the government can't tell your citizens what to do ?
What section is that in? Quote it to me. Since you now seem to be an authority on the US Constitution.

Hint, government does tell citizens they must stop at a stop sign.


Pay taxes , go to jail , go to war , Blah Blah

I'm no expert but as some one said I can only get my views watching Murdochs News services :-)
ID: 1799512 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile janneseti
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 09
Posts: 14106
Credit: 655,366
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 1799518 - Posted: 30 Jun 2016, 0:11:00 UTC - in response to Message 1799511.  

dear I say it "that dag flipping constitution gets in the way all the dang time"

Yep it protects us from tyrants. Hmmm lots of those about mate. ;)

Full Definition of tyrant

a : an absolute ruler unrestrained by law or constitution
b : a usurper of sovereignty

a : a ruler who exercises absolute power oppressively or brutally
b : one resembling an oppressive ruler in the harsh use of authority or power

Why do I come to think about Donald Trump reading the definition of a tyrant?
ID: 1799518 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile j mercer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Jun 99
Posts: 2422
Credit: 12,323,733
RAC: 1
United States
Message 1799529 - Posted: 30 Jun 2016, 0:51:49 UTC - in response to Message 1799518.  

dear I say it "that dag flipping constitution gets in the way all the dang time"

Yep it protects us from tyrants. Hmmm lots of those about mate. ;)

Full Definition of tyrant

a : an absolute ruler unrestrained by law or constitution
b : a usurper of sovereignty

a : a ruler who exercises absolute power oppressively or brutally
b : one resembling an oppressive ruler in the harsh use of authority or power

Why do I come to think about Donald Trump reading the definition of a tyrant?

In my country that would be your choice and that is fine with me. I see him differently though but I'm sure you all have a problem with that. ;)
...
ID: 1799529 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Darth Beaver Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 99
Posts: 6728
Credit: 21,443,075
RAC: 3
Australia
Message 1799532 - Posted: 30 Jun 2016, 1:14:20 UTC - in response to Message 1799529.  



dear I say it "that dag flipping constitution gets in the way all the dang time"

Yep it protects us from tyrants. Hmmm lots of those about mate. ;)

Full Definition of tyrant

a : an absolute ruler unrestrained by law or constitution
b : a usurper of sovereignty

a : a ruler who exercises absolute power oppressively or brutally
b : one resembling an oppressive ruler in the harsh use of authority or power
Why do I come to think about Donald Trump reading the definition of a tyrant?
In my country that would be your choice and that is fine with me. I see him differently though but I'm sure you all have a problem with that. ;)


No we don't ..... Gona be a Good show if he wins ...and very funny for us but bad for you's you'll be stuck with him for 4 YEARS
ID: 1799532 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30639
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1799533 - Posted: 30 Jun 2016, 1:17:58 UTC - in response to Message 1799512.  

[Pay taxes , go to jail , go to war , Blah Blah

I'm no expert but as some one said I can only get my views watching Murdochs News services :-)

Yes, and that is a problem isn't it?!

So who you gonna listen to: Murdoch or an American who might just understand how all the pieces fit together?

Or put it this way, does it matter how strict the gun law is, if no one can be put on the deny list? Chew on that for a while.

I'm off to chew on some dinner and prepare for Thorsday!
ID: 1799533 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Darth Beaver Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 99
Posts: 6728
Credit: 21,443,075
RAC: 3
Australia
Message 1799536 - Posted: 30 Jun 2016, 1:24:28 UTC

Gary I don't have Foxtel or Telstra or bye Murdochs papers ......He a American NOW !!!

I watch ABC NEWS24

or SBS World News :-)
ID: 1799536 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile janneseti
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 09
Posts: 14106
Credit: 655,366
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 1799540 - Posted: 30 Jun 2016, 1:39:14 UTC - in response to Message 1799529.  

dear I say it "that dag flipping constitution gets in the way all the dang time"

Yep it protects us from tyrants. Hmmm lots of those about mate. ;)

Full Definition of tyrant

a : an absolute ruler unrestrained by law or constitution
b : a usurper of sovereignty

a : a ruler who exercises absolute power oppressively or brutally
b : one resembling an oppressive ruler in the harsh use of authority or power

Why do I come to think about Donald Trump reading the definition of a tyrant?

In my country that would be your choice and that is fine with me. I see him differently though but I'm sure you all have a problem with that. ;)

Not yet, but Scotland have.
ID: 1799540 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 . . . 234 · Next

Message boards : Politics : Another example of USA Gun Laws (or lack of...)?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.