plan_class for AMD R9 Fury Nano?

Message boards : Number crunching : plan_class for AMD R9 Fury Nano?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
gary craig

Send message
Joined: 24 Feb 02
Posts: 2
Credit: 584,241
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1741683 - Posted: 13 Nov 2015, 4:49:58 UTC

Hi, I'm a new admin over at PrimeGrid and we have a user who can't get any work for his Fury Nano. The card is recognized, but the server never sends work.

With RPC tracing turned on, his nnn_sched_request.xml has (in part):
<have_cal>0</have_cal>
<have_opencl>1</have_opencl>
<CALVersion></CALVersion>

While the plan_class_spec.xml file has (in part):
<need_ati_libs/>
<min_driver_version> 1300000 </min_driver_version>
<min_cal_target>0</min_cal_target>

The user has tried with boinc client 7.6.9 and 7.6.15; same failure with both.

Do we need a new plan_class? Pointers on what to change would be appreciated.

TIA,
--Gary
ID: 1741683 · Report as offensive
Profile BilBg
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 May 07
Posts: 3720
Credit: 9,385,827
RAC: 0
Bulgaria
Message 1741694 - Posted: 13 Nov 2015, 6:37:52 UTC - in response to Message 1741683.  

You may see if the file used at SETI@home beta will give you some clues:
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/plan_class_spec.xml
 


- ALF - "Find out what you don't do well ..... then don't do it!" :)
 
ID: 1741694 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : plan_class for AMD R9 Fury Nano?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.