Message boards :
Number crunching :
plan_class for AMD R9 Fury Nano?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
gary craig Send message Joined: 24 Feb 02 Posts: 2 Credit: 584,241 RAC: 0 |
Hi, I'm a new admin over at PrimeGrid and we have a user who can't get any work for his Fury Nano. The card is recognized, but the server never sends work. With RPC tracing turned on, his nnn_sched_request.xml has (in part): <have_cal>0</have_cal> <have_opencl>1</have_opencl> <CALVersion></CALVersion> While the plan_class_spec.xml file has (in part): <need_ati_libs/> <min_driver_version> 1300000 </min_driver_version> <min_cal_target>0</min_cal_target> The user has tried with boinc client 7.6.9 and 7.6.15; same failure with both. Do we need a new plan_class? Pointers on what to change would be appreciated. TIA, --Gary |
BilBg Send message Joined: 27 May 07 Posts: 3720 Credit: 9,385,827 RAC: 0 |
You may see if the file used at SETI@home beta will give you some clues: http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/plan_class_spec.xml  - ALF - "Find out what you don't do well ..... then don't do it!" :)  |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.