Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (101) Server Problems?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 . . . 27 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Zalster Send message Joined: 27 May 99 Posts: 5517 Credit: 528,817,460 RAC: 242 |
Well I know I got my combo nvidia/intel macpro book crunching away. Too bad there isn't a way to list all the imacs/macbook that use the intel to crunch. |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
Here's an interesting phenomena. If you look at the Apps page you see the amount of production for each App. Let's look at these two, I would guess not enough results have been reported by those devices in the time period required so that they GPUs are listed. It could be useful to add another coloumn on the app list after "average computing" with the number of hosts that were used to get that average. Like the "Number of computers" column on the CPU list. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
TBar Send message Joined: 22 May 99 Posts: 5204 Credit: 840,779,836 RAC: 2,768 |
Here's an interesting phenomena. If you look at the Apps page you see the amount of production for each App. Let's look at these two, Considering the nVidia Mac App was only released 1 week ago and it has already amassed 5000 GigaFLOPS I don't think that is an accurate guess. There had to have been Many more results submitted in the last 7 days to pull ahead of the Linux App so quickly. Yet there aren't any listings on the GPU page that appears to be updated a couple times a day. Something else is at play. Looking at the most recent update, there Now appears to be a few listings under the Mac column. |
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 |
Here's an interesting phenomena. If you look at the Apps page you see the amount of production for each App. Let's look at these two, Agree, Over a week has gone by now, and now they are displayed: Mac 1. (1.000) GeForce GTX 680 2. (0.916) GeForce GTX 780M 3. (0.760) GeForce GTX 675MX 4. (0.216) GeForce GTX 680MX 5. (0.009) GeForce 9400 6. (0.009) GeForce GT 120 Claggy |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
Here's an interesting phenomena. If you look at the Apps page you see the amount of production for each App. Let's look at these two, The most recent polling at 24 Oct 2015, 0:10:45 looks to have picked them up. The last change to the Top GPUs list on github was: Oct 20, 2014 - @davidpanderson GPU list script: fix bug, and include anonymous platform hosts. So it just took some time for the app to go out & hosts to start returning enough work to be added to the list. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
TBar Send message Joined: 22 May 99 Posts: 5204 Credit: 840,779,836 RAC: 2,768 |
Here's an interesting phenomena. If you look at the Apps page you see the amount of production for each App. Let's look at these two, Strange that when the ATI Apps were released it didn't take a week before some were displayed. I've launched specific hardware and seen it show up within a day back when there were few Linux GPUs being displayed. Not to mention the Mac nVidia AP App has been around for quite a while and recently has had constant results returned from caches yet nothing was being displayed...until I mentioned it. Look at the Mac nVidia AP number, it's quite high comparatively and the slower cards have been working continuously. Those of us that pay attention aren't easily fooled, believe what you wish, within hours of me mentioning it they appeared. |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
Strange that when the ATI Apps were released it didn't take a week before some were displayed. I've launched specific hardware and seen it show up within a day back when there were few Linux GPUs being displayed. Not to mention the Mac nVidia AP App has been around for quite a while and recently has had constant results returned from caches yet nothing was being displayed...until I mentioned it. Look at the Mac nVidia AP number, it's quite high comparatively and the slower cards have been working continuously. Those of us that pay attention aren't easily fooled, believe what you wish, within hours of me mentioning it they appeared. I'm not sure what the threshold value for a specific GPU to be displayed might be. The CPU list requires 10 hosts before a specific CPU is listed. I'm not sure that same limit is used on the GPU list. As I have from time to time seem my custom GPU name of "ATI Radeon HD 6870 (Barts XT)" be displayed instead of the BOINC stock "AMD Radeon HD 6790/6850/6870 series (Barts)" From what I can tell in the code it requires there be at least 1 device in the past 30 days. There is a section where it is getting the results that states $results = BoincResult::enum( "app_version_id in ($av_ids) and create_time > $t and elapsed_time>100 limit 500" );. So it looks like tasks under 100 seconds don't get counted. Which would prevent those that GPU's that only produce invalids ever 5 seconds from getting mixed in. However I'm not seeing any other limiting factor. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 |
Strange that when the ATI Apps were released it didn't take a week before some were displayed. I've launched specific hardware and seen it show up within a day back when there were few Linux GPUs being displayed. Not to mention the Mac nVidia AP App has been around for quite a while and recently has had constant results returned from caches yet nothing was being displayed...until I mentioned it. Look at the Mac nVidia AP number, it's quite high comparatively and the slower cards have been working continuously. Those of us that pay attention aren't easily fooled, believe what you wish, within hours of me mentioning it they appeared. And back to: Mac For both Nvidia and Intel GPUs, perhaps there weren't enough hosts/samples in this latest snapshot. Claggy |
TBar Send message Joined: 22 May 99 Posts: 5204 Credit: 840,779,836 RAC: 2,768 |
Linux/x86_64 7.08 (opencl_nvidia_sah) 18 Sep 2015, 18:34:25 UTC 3,191 GigaFLOPS Linux/x86_64 7.08 (opencl_nvidia_100) 21 May 2015, 23:56:05 UTC 328 GigaFLOPS Linux/x86_64 7.08 (opencl_nvidia_cc1) 21 May 2015, 23:56:05 UTC 156 GigaFLOPS Mac OS X/64-bit Intel 7.08 (opencl_nvidia_mac) 16 Oct 2015, 18:45:36 UTC 5,806 GigaFLOPS Mac OS X/64-bit Intel 7.07 (opencl_nvidia_mac) 23 Apr 2015, 18:50:41 UTC 3,906 GigaFLOPS http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/apps.php Over Twice as many nVidia Mac Results as linux results, yet SETI says; Mac: No GPU tasks reported Just as a I said, obviously a reoccurring glitch in the matrix. A glitch that's been there quite a while. |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
Strange that when the ATI Apps were released it didn't take a week before some were displayed. I've launched specific hardware and seen it show up within a day back when there were few Linux GPUs being displayed. Not to mention the Mac nVidia AP App has been around for quite a while and recently has had constant results returned from caches yet nothing was being displayed...until I mentioned it. Look at the Mac nVidia AP number, it's quite high comparatively and the slower cards have been working continuously. Those of us that pay attention aren't easily fooled, believe what you wish, within hours of me mentioning it they appeared. The Total is also missing under Intel. Maybe it doesn't show up when there is only one platform? That would make logical sense I suppose. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
WezH Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 576 Credit: 67,033,957 RAC: 95 |
Splitters are struggling to produce MB wu's, no Ready-to-send buffer for a day. And now they are in Maximum Overdrive. Over 500K MB's ready to send. Haven't seen that before.... |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14649 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Splitters are struggling to produce MB wu's, no Ready-to-send buffer for a day. That happens when they miss the 'inhibit' signal at high water mark. Not a good sign. |
JaundicedEye Send message Joined: 14 Mar 12 Posts: 5375 Credit: 30,870,693 RAC: 1 |
I recently (2 weeks ago) initiated using the Intel GPU portion of my I7 Haswell chips through lunatics with 3 threads processing (as do my nvidia GPUs). Are these GPU activities shown on the comparison chart? "Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)> |
TBar Send message Joined: 22 May 99 Posts: 5204 Credit: 840,779,836 RAC: 2,768 |
Strange that when the ATI Apps were released it didn't take a week before some were displayed. I've launched specific hardware and seen it show up within a day back when there were few Linux GPUs being displayed. Not to mention the Mac nVidia AP App has been around for quite a while and recently has had constant results returned from caches yet nothing was being displayed...until I mentioned it. Look at the Mac nVidia AP number, it's quite high comparatively and the slower cards have been working continuously. Those of us that pay attention aren't easily fooled, believe what you wish, within hours of me mentioning it they appeared. Maybe you can elaborate on what you mean by only one platform? Most people consider a single platform OS being one where you can't mix AMD/ATI cards with nVidia cards, such as Linux or Vista. Certainly not OSX where AMD & nVidia drivers are built into the System. Currently you can even download nVidia drivers for the Macs with nVidia cards, I've been able to download NV Webdrivers for my MacPro ever since I can remember. Let's look at another comparison, this time comparing the results from both platforms. Note the current OSX AMD MBv7 Apps were released the same date as the nVidia MBv7 App and the counters began from Zero for both; Mac OS X/64-bit Intel 7.08 (opencl_ati5zc_mac) 16 Oct 2015, 18:45:36 UTC 2,788 GigaFLOPS Mac OS X/64-bit Intel 7.08 (opencl_ati5_mac) 16 Oct 2015, 18:45:36 UTC 6,073 GigaFLOPS Mac OS X/64-bit Intel 7.08 (opencl_ati_mac) 16 Oct 2015, 18:45:36 UTC 2,117 GigaFLOPS Mac OS X/64-bit Intel 7.07 (opencl_ati_mac) 23 Apr 2015, 18:50:41 UTC 552 GigaFLOPS 11,530 Mac OS X/64-bit Intel 7.08 (opencl_nvidia_mac) 16 Oct 2015, 18:45:36 UTC 6,043 GigaFLOPS Mac OS X/64-bit Intel 7.07 (opencl_nvidia_mac) 23 Apr 2015, 18:50:41 UTC 3,820 GigaFLOPS 9,863 Not much difference there, note the nVidia MBv7 App is still increasing at a good pace. Not a problem with the AMD Results, the nVidia results Still say, No GPU tasks reported Strange seeing as how there isn't that much difference between the AMD & NV numbers. Now here is the difference, note the Total Linux GPU number, 4,312. I'm afraid there are Over Twice as many OSX nVidia results as ALL the Linux GPU results combined. Why some people continue to deny the Obvious is a mystery. It's Broken. |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
Strange that when the ATI Apps were released it didn't take a week before some were displayed. I've launched specific hardware and seen it show up within a day back when there were few Linux GPUs being displayed. Not to mention the Mac nVidia AP App has been around for quite a while and recently has had constant results returned from caches yet nothing was being displayed...until I mentioned it. Look at the Mac nVidia AP number, it's quite high comparatively and the slower cards have been working continuously. Those of us that pay attention aren't easily fooled, believe what you wish, within hours of me mentioning it they appeared. I'd be happy to do so. The Top GPU models list, which are talking about, is separated by platform, Windows, Linux, & Mac. Additionally a total column ranking the GPUs across all three platforms. As of the 25 Oct 2015, 16:06:29 UTC update the Total column under Intel is missing. There are only GPUs listed under Windows with Linux & Mac indicating No GPU tasks reported. I am guessing as there is only data for the one platform the total column is not being included as it would be redundant. At this point all we can do is guess. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
Sutaru Tsureku Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5 |
JaundicedEye wrote: I recently (2 weeks ago) initiated using the Intel GPU portion of my I7 Haswell chips through lunatics with 3 threads processing (as do my nvidia GPUs). Are these GPU activities shown on the comparison chart? If you use opti apps with app_info.xml file (anonymous platform) then your GPUs are not added to the list. AFAIK, just stock SETI BOINCs are shown. Because of this my AMD Radeon R9 Fury X's ('Fiji') are not shown in this list. Because of: Top GPU models. But I guess it's also because of the Applications overview. |
TBar Send message Joined: 22 May 99 Posts: 5204 Credit: 840,779,836 RAC: 2,768 |
Strange that when the ATI Apps were released it didn't take a week before some were displayed. I've launched specific hardware and seen it show up within a day back when there were few Linux GPUs being displayed. Not to mention the Mac nVidia AP App has been around for quite a while and recently has had constant results returned from caches yet nothing was being displayed...until I mentioned it. Look at the Mac nVidia AP number, it's quite high comparatively and the slower cards have been working continuously. Those of us that pay attention aren't easily fooled, believe what you wish, within hours of me mentioning it they appeared. Yes, that part is also currently Broken. There are usually 3 entries under the Mac section, Iris Pro, Iris , and 1 other. Since someone kicked it the other day that part has also gone belly up. It has been working almost continuously since my Mac CPU apps were released and I started paying close attention to the page. You see, I have been looking at that page almost Everyday for sometime, so I can speak from observation. That why I get annoyed when I report yet Another Bug and get the same old song & dance about some river in Egypt. |
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 |
Splitters are struggling to produce MB wu's, no Ready-to-send buffer for a day. Judging by the pretty steady increase on the weekly graph, I would vote for something is amiss. There have been a few times in the past couple of years where there was a DB crash that took a while to recover from, and when the DB came back online, there were over 2 million RTS, and it took a surprisingly short amount of time to get that back down to under 300K.. like.. two hours to assign that many WUs. I want to say having that high of an RTS was somewhat common before the move to the co-lo, but has happened once or twice since then. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
WezH Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 576 Credit: 67,033,957 RAC: 95 |
Splitters are struggling to produce MB wu's, no Ready-to-send buffer for a day. Or maybe someone did increase RTS -buffer to about 600K? Just my guess... We wait and see. |
Swibby Bear Send message Joined: 1 Aug 01 Posts: 246 Credit: 7,945,093 RAC: 0 |
[/quote] Or maybe someone did increase RTS -buffer to about 600K? Just my guess... [/quote] I was about to make the same guess, but add that maybe they are planning some operation during tomorrow's outage that might take a longer-than-usual time. With a bulked-up RTS queue, recovery would be easier. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.