existance of god

Message boards : Politics : existance of god
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 . . . 21 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile John Neale
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 00
Posts: 634
Credit: 7,246,513
RAC: 9
South Africa
Message 1736394 - Posted: 23 Oct 2015, 14:31:33 UTC - in response to Message 1736360.  

<snip>

Or if you have a hard time with this...

<snip>

...if one were able to understand the concept at all...

<snip>

...never once having the wit to understand...

<snip>

Once one understands...

<snip>

One can only know God ... when one can reason...

So, practically speaking (and I'm an engineer, so I deal in nuts and bolts rather than abstract linguistic gymnastics), what use is any god if, as I suggest, around 98 % of human beings who have ever existed have not had the capacity, by your hurdle, to "know God"?
ID: 1736394 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11361
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1736462 - Posted: 23 Oct 2015, 19:15:36 UTC - in response to Message 1736461.  

I look forward to the return coming of Johnny Guinness.

+ 1
Profile of Philosopher8659
This member has been banned. (Mar 4, 2015 - 12:02 PM by unenlightened. Reason: low post quality)

I can understand that.
ID: 1736462 · Report as offensive
Dave(The Admiral)Nelson

Send message
Joined: 4 Jun 99
Posts: 415
Credit: 22,293,483
RAC: 1
United States
Message 1736520 - Posted: 23 Oct 2015, 21:22:16 UTC

You lost me. Who is Johnny Guiness?
Dave Nelson
ID: 1736520 · Report as offensive
Mark Stevenson Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 11
Posts: 1736
Credit: 174,899,165
RAC: 91
United Kingdom
Message 1736522 - Posted: 23 Oct 2015, 21:26:57 UTC - in response to Message 1736520.  
Last modified: 23 Oct 2015, 21:32:21 UTC

You lost me. Who is Johnny Guiness?


Johnny Guiness was posting a lot when I first started with this project . I'm not sure what happened but he has been quiet for some time now . His posts are still in the forums and I'm sure if you used the search function you can find all of his posts to read for yourself

Edit
think his team was called paddy's in space or something similar
ID: 1736522 · Report as offensive
Profile janneseti
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 09
Posts: 14106
Credit: 655,366
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 1736523 - Posted: 23 Oct 2015, 21:30:25 UTC - in response to Message 1736520.  

You lost me. Who is Johnny Guiness?

LOL.
ID: 1736523 · Report as offensive
Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 12273
Credit: 8,569,109
RAC: 79
United States
Message 1736610 - Posted: 24 Oct 2015, 3:31:58 UTC - in response to Message 1736388.  

It must give you atheists a nice, warm fuzzy feeling to huddle together, here in the darkness, nodding in agreement among each other and acknowledging to each other that we are here, all alone. Nothing but the product of randomness in the vastness of space. A series of lucky rolls of the dice to lead us to "think, therefore we are... but why?" And then conclude that we all eat, reproduce and then die--all for no reason. A blink of an eye on a cosmic scale, then we vanish, cease, extinguish--back into nothingness.

Ah... Feels good to come to that conclusion, doesn't it?

I've never heard a better description about the belief of religion as you have just offered. Gives you a warm fuzzy feeling to believe in the mythical man in the sky who will make it all better.

psycosis: noun: a severe mental disorder in which thought and emotions are so impaired that contact is lost with external reality.

BTW there is a reason we eat, reproduce and die: entropy.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGC_FE-pr_w
ID: 1736610 · Report as offensive
Profile janneseti
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 09
Posts: 14106
Credit: 655,366
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 1736652 - Posted: 24 Oct 2015, 11:31:50 UTC - in response to Message 1736610.  
Last modified: 24 Oct 2015, 12:03:11 UTC

It must give you atheists a nice, warm fuzzy feeling to huddle together, here in the darkness, nodding in agreement among each other and acknowledging to each other that we are here, all alone. Nothing but the product of randomness in the vastness of space. A series of lucky rolls of the dice to lead us to "think, therefore we are... but why?" And then conclude that we all eat, reproduce and then die--all for no reason. A blink of an eye on a cosmic scale, then we vanish, cease, extinguish--back into nothingness.
Ah... Feels good to come to that conclusion, doesn't it?

I've never heard a better description about the belief of religion as you have just offered. Gives you a warm fuzzy feeling to believe in the mythical man in the sky who will make it all better.
psycosis: noun: a severe mental disorder in which thought and emotions are so impaired that contact is lost with external reality.
BTW there is a reason we eat, reproduce and die: entropy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGC_FE-pr_w

God bless atheism.

On the other hand.
How can a collection of atoms be self aware?
Not only that. Life is inherited from the first successful DNA molecule that is thought to have occurred on Earth between 3.8 and 4 billion years ago.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
Life doesn't follow the second law of thermodynamics.
Life is a subset of a universal system and doesn't break any laws but it's a rather strange behaviour.
ID: 1736652 · Report as offensive
Profile Philosopher8659

Send message
Joined: 21 Oct 15
Posts: 97
Credit: 2,696
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1736679 - Posted: 24 Oct 2015, 14:28:26 UTC - in response to Message 1736461.  

One can only know God ... when one can reason...

So, practically speaking (and I'm an engineer, so I deal in nuts and bolts rather than abstract linguistic gymnastics), what use is any god if, as I suggest, around 98 % of human beings who have ever existed have not had the capacity, by your hurdle, to "know God"?

The world just does not recognize a prophet in his own time.
In his Seti profile Philo... most humbly admitted to being an unwilling prophet,
and, i assume, his great humility made him edit that profile.
Even on http://forums.philosophyforums.com/members/philosopher8659-60537.html he is not recognized
for being enlightened, having been banned by unenlightened. Reason: low post quality.
The only prophet recognized on the Seti forums is Johnny Guinness, and he has
promised to return after decoding the secrets of anti-gravity from the human genome.
I look forward to the return coming of Johnny Guinness.



I edited my profile to aid in an understanding of meaning.

And, you really do not have to take my word for the fact that the human race is currently proto-linguistic, try to follow any of my arguments in my essays, I define the concept and only predicate what is given in the definition.
https://archive.org/details/AUniversalLanguage

https://archive.org/details/TheDifferenceBetweenManAndBeast

https://archive.org/details/DelianQuest2015
ID: 1736679 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30648
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1736680 - Posted: 24 Oct 2015, 14:39:11 UTC - in response to Message 1736672.  

How can a collection of atoms be self aware?

Best question, regarding The Subject.

How?

Better question: Given The Schrödinger wave equation, how can a collection of atoms not be self aware?
ID: 1736680 · Report as offensive
Dave(The Admiral)Nelson

Send message
Joined: 4 Jun 99
Posts: 415
Credit: 22,293,483
RAC: 1
United States
Message 1736682 - Posted: 24 Oct 2015, 14:49:26 UTC
Last modified: 24 Oct 2015, 14:50:05 UTC

Could P8659 be a troll?
Dave Nelson
ID: 1736682 · Report as offensive
Profile Philosopher8659

Send message
Joined: 21 Oct 15
Posts: 97
Credit: 2,696
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1736690 - Posted: 24 Oct 2015, 15:19:03 UTC - in response to Message 1736682.  

Could P8659 be a troll?


Absolutely!

I could even be a tree in somebodies back yard.
https://archive.org/details/AUniversalLanguage

https://archive.org/details/TheDifferenceBetweenManAndBeast

https://archive.org/details/DelianQuest2015
ID: 1736690 · Report as offensive
Profile janneseti
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 09
Posts: 14106
Credit: 655,366
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 1736703 - Posted: 24 Oct 2015, 16:14:38 UTC - in response to Message 1736680.  
Last modified: 24 Oct 2015, 16:18:02 UTC

How can a collection of atoms be self aware?

Best question, regarding The Subject.

How?

Better question: Given The Schrödinger wave equation, how can a collection of atoms not be self aware?

Hmm.
"The Schrödinger equation is a partial differential equation that describes how the quantum state of a quantum system changes with time".
That's probably only a tiny part of the answer.
Particles interact with each other in many ways.
The problem with life is that many trillions of atoms in an organism interact with each other together.
Perhaps self awareness is only a function and a result from physical laws but that seems very strange to me.

@Clyde
The Schrödinger wave equation is a fact, not a hypothesis.
ID: 1736703 · Report as offensive
Мишель
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Nov 13
Posts: 3073
Credit: 87,868
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 1736704 - Posted: 24 Oct 2015, 16:16:32 UTC - in response to Message 1736679.  

And, you really do not have to take my word for the fact that the human race is currently proto-linguistic, try to follow any of my arguments in my essays, I define the concept and only predicate what is given in the definition.

Actually I think the term proto-linguistic doesn't really make sense. A proto-language is a thing, and linguistics refers to the science of language and linguistic to language/linguistics. Logically proto-linguistics would thus be whatever sort of science came before linguistics, the common ancestor of a number of linguistics studies.
ID: 1736704 · Report as offensive
Profile Es99
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 10874
Credit: 350,402
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1736707 - Posted: 24 Oct 2015, 16:38:34 UTC - in response to Message 1736372.  

It must give you atheists a nice, warm fuzzy feeling to huddle together, here in the darkness, nodding in agreement among each other and acknowledging to each other that we are here, all alone. Nothing but the product of randomness in the vastness of space. A series of lucky rolls of the dice to lead us to "think, therefore we are... but why?" And then conclude that we all eat, reproduce and then die--all for no reason. A blink of an eye on a cosmic scale, then we vanish, cease, extinguish--back into nothingness.

Ah... Feels good to come to that conclusion, doesn't it?

Actually, it is very liberating. The moment I realised that I didn't believe in god I felt a huge weight lift off me and realised that I had more control over my life than I realised. There was no 'great plan' and I wasn't being judged by a set of rules that seemed horribly unfair. It was wonderful.

I highly recommend it.
Reality Internet Personality
ID: 1736707 · Report as offensive
Profile janneseti
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 09
Posts: 14106
Credit: 655,366
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 1736716 - Posted: 24 Oct 2015, 16:55:05 UTC - in response to Message 1736706.  
Last modified: 24 Oct 2015, 17:02:20 UTC

Just as Discarded 'facts', in the past did. It is just, as other theories, the present explanation. To be questioned, as all must be.
This hopefully brings us inches closer to The Truth.
We are in the childhood of our Scientific Era. Where, many years from now: Many of our present Accepted Facts, will be discarded.

That science are being questioned all the time is part of all scientific works.
For instance Newton's law of gravity is not quite correct.
There have been measurements done of the distance to moon using mirrors placed there during the Apollo project.
It turns out that is a difference between measurements and calculations and it's being different by some meters.
Perhaps it's the Heisenberg uncertainty rule that are the cause.

The Schrödinger wave equation and other quantum mechanical rules have been tested over and over again.
You dont find those discrepancies there.
ID: 1736716 · Report as offensive
Profile Robert Waite
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Oct 07
Posts: 2417
Credit: 18,192,122
RAC: 59
Canada
Message 1736717 - Posted: 24 Oct 2015, 17:00:32 UTC - in response to Message 1736707.  


Actually, it is very liberating. The moment I realised that I didn't believe in god I felt a huge weight lift off me and realised that I had more control over my life than I realised. There was no 'great plan' and I wasn't being judged by a set of rules that seemed horribly unfair. It was wonderful.

I highly recommend it.


That was my experience too Es99
The sudden sense of freedom and feeling more at one with the universe than any other point in my life.
I do not fight fascists because I think I can win.
I fight them because they are fascists.
Chris Hedges

A riot is the language of the unheard. -Martin Luther King, Jr.
ID: 1736717 · Report as offensive
Profile Es99
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 05
Posts: 10874
Credit: 350,402
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1736731 - Posted: 24 Oct 2015, 17:42:46 UTC - in response to Message 1736717.  


Actually, it is very liberating. The moment I realised that I didn't believe in god I felt a huge weight lift off me and realised that I had more control over my life than I realised. There was no 'great plan' and I wasn't being judged by a set of rules that seemed horribly unfair. It was wonderful.

I highly recommend it.


That was my experience too Es99
The sudden sense of freedom and feeling more at one with the universe than any other point in my life.

It really did feel like "the scales had fallen from my eyes" and I could see everything clearly for the first time. I agree, I certainly feel more like part of this wonderful universe an closer to my species than before. We are all in the same boat, and the best we can do is take responsibility for how we deal with the randomness of it all. It is very empowering.
Reality Internet Personality
ID: 1736731 · Report as offensive
bobby
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Mar 02
Posts: 2866
Credit: 17,789,109
RAC: 3
United States
Message 1736742 - Posted: 24 Oct 2015, 19:10:43 UTC - in response to Message 1736652.  

Life doesn't follow the second law of thermodynamics.

It doesn't? Are you sure?
I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

ID: 1736742 · Report as offensive
Profile janneseti
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 09
Posts: 14106
Credit: 655,366
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 1736744 - Posted: 24 Oct 2015, 19:19:22 UTC - in response to Message 1736742.  
Last modified: 24 Oct 2015, 19:55:36 UTC

Life doesn't follow the second law of thermodynamics.

It doesn't? Are you sure?

Yes.
Can you tell any other physical phenomea that does the same?
But it also depends what part of the system you are observing.
If you look at the universe as a whole, life is decaying and following the second law of thermodynamics.
However, our galaxy is too young to experience that.

Come to think about it.
Quantum tunneling effect.
In order for a particle to get a lower energy from a higher energy level you require some energy to do that.
It's like having a basket with a ball on top of an other basket.
You must pull the ball out from the top basket so it can move the lower one.
Balls in the quantum world doesn't care.
They move anyway.
ID: 1736744 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30648
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1736757 - Posted: 24 Oct 2015, 19:48:34 UTC - in response to Message 1736703.  

How can a collection of atoms be self aware?

Best question, regarding The Subject.

How?

Better question: Given The Schrödinger wave equation, how can a collection of atoms not be self aware?

Hmm.
"The Schrödinger equation is a partial differential equation that describes how the quantum state of a quantum system changes with time".
That's probably only a tiny part of the answer.
Particles interact with each other in many ways.
The problem with life is that many trillions of atoms in an organism interact with each other together.
Perhaps self awareness is only a function and a result from physical laws but that seems very strange to me.

Physics is not only strange, but stranger than we can imagine.

To exist something has to collapse the wave function. So if an atom exists, it is aware of itself because the wave function is collapsed. The collapse limits how/where/when it can interact so it very much is aware of this happening. Perhaps the thought process it uses to conclude that is alien to a human brain, but nevertheless it occurs. It sets into play the entire universe.

Actually I think the definition of self aware may need a lot of work. Jacaranda trees are aware of each other. They smell. We can't talk to cats, dogs, dolphins or jacaranda trees so we don't know if they are aware of themselves in the manner the questioner means. But they may well know the true meaning of life. 42.
ID: 1736757 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 . . . 21 · Next

Message boards : Politics : existance of god


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.