Big Pharmaceutical companies price gouging

Message boards : Politics : Big Pharmaceutical companies price gouging
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 7 · 8 · 9 · 10

AuthorMessage
Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 12273
Credit: 8,569,109
RAC: 79
United States
Message 1729033 - Posted: 26 Sep 2015, 5:09:57 UTC

And here, too? Well, hello there, person against people being silenced but works hard to silence them.
ID: 1729033 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19062
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 1729554 - Posted: 27 Sep 2015, 15:06:27 UTC

Seems like our American friends are being screwed twice for their medicines.

The manufacturers claiming the need to charge high prices so they can research new and better drugs, when they actually spend more on PR and advertising. And what they do spend on research is on making their own slightly different version of known drugs.

While all the time the US government is spending taxes to fund the Universities to research completely new drugs. This is then sold to the pharmaceutical companies for pennies.

washington post - Why do drug companies charge so much? Because they can.
ID: 1729554 · Report as offensive
Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 12273
Credit: 8,569,109
RAC: 79
United States
Message 1729561 - Posted: 27 Sep 2015, 15:35:25 UTC - in response to Message 1729554.  

Seems like our American friends are being screwed twice for their medicines.

The manufacturers claiming the need to charge high prices so they can research new and better drugs, when they actually spend more on PR and advertising. And what they do spend on research is on making their own slightly different version of known drugs.

While all the time the US government is spending taxes to fund the Universities to research completely new drugs. This is then sold to the pharmaceutical companies for pennies.

washington post - Why do drug companies charge so much? Because they can.


What's wrong with advertising? The ones for .... male ... problems are hilarious! Someday soon, I shall go to my doctor and be asked to be prescribed everything advertised for problems I do not have. LOL!
ID: 1729561 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 1729586 - Posted: 27 Sep 2015, 17:47:34 UTC - in response to Message 1729561.  

Seems like our American friends are being screwed twice for their medicines.

The manufacturers claiming the need to charge high prices so they can research new and better drugs, when they actually spend more on PR and advertising. And what they do spend on research is on making their own slightly different version of known drugs.

While all the time the US government is spending taxes to fund the Universities to research completely new drugs. This is then sold to the pharmaceutical companies for pennies.

washington post - Why do drug companies charge so much? Because they can.


What's wrong with advertising? The ones for .... male ... problems are hilarious! Someday soon, I shall go to my doctor and be asked to be prescribed everything advertised for problems I do not have. LOL!

At my age, the only penile problem is not getting it up, it's getting it to pee...LOL. THAT is erectile dysfunction.
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 1729586 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19062
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 1729700 - Posted: 28 Sep 2015, 3:01:38 UTC - in response to Message 1729561.  

Seems like our American friends are being screwed twice for their medicines.

The manufacturers claiming the need to charge high prices so they can research new and better drugs, when they actually spend more on PR and advertising. And what they do spend on research is on making their own slightly different version of known drugs.

While all the time the US government is spending taxes to fund the Universities to research completely new drugs. This is then sold to the pharmaceutical companies for pennies.

washington post - Why do drug companies charge so much? Because they can.


What's wrong with advertising? The ones for .... male ... problems are hilarious! Someday soon, I shall go to my doctor and be asked to be prescribed everything advertised for problems I do not have. LOL!

I'll answer that with a question.

Why do prescription drugs need to be advertised to the general public?

Are you saying that the American in the street is qualified to make choice between drug A and drug B. If so then show me evidence because I see signs of it, the average American seems just as uneducated as the average Brit.
ID: 1729700 · Report as offensive
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 3387
Credit: 4,182,900
RAC: 10
United States
Message 1729793 - Posted: 28 Sep 2015, 14:49:13 UTC

I understand that new drugs come along after a long period of research and clinical trials and that it takes a lot of money to get a new drug to market. I also understand that any drug that can save one person's life may kill another person with the same ailment and that due to the legal climate in the US and most likely other countries pharmaceutical companies expose themselves to the possibility of lawsuits that could bring them to their knees. That may or may not justify the high cost of some drugs. But I feel that certain drugs that are established on the market like insulin that is needed by those who take it for the rest of their lives should be price capped by law and any price increase only be allowed after being reviewed as necessary to maintain minimum profitability for the company making it. This may be considered a Cinderella point of view by those who have no need for such medications but not to the millions who need certain drugs to just stay alive.
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.
ID: 1729793 · Report as offensive
Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 12273
Credit: 8,569,109
RAC: 79
United States
Message 1729804 - Posted: 28 Sep 2015, 15:29:04 UTC - in response to Message 1729700.  

Seems like our American friends are being screwed twice for their medicines.

The manufacturers claiming the need to charge high prices so they can research new and better drugs, when they actually spend more on PR and advertising. And what they do spend on research is on making their own slightly different version of known drugs.

While all the time the US government is spending taxes to fund the Universities to research completely new drugs. This is then sold to the pharmaceutical companies for pennies.

washington post - Why do drug companies charge so much? Because they can.


What's wrong with advertising? The ones for .... male ... problems are hilarious! Someday soon, I shall go to my doctor and be asked to be prescribed everything advertised for problems I do not have. LOL!

I'll answer that with a question.

Why do prescription drugs need to be advertised to the general public?

Are you saying that the American in the street is qualified to make choice between drug A and drug B. If so then show me evidence because I see signs of it, the average American seems just as uneducated as the average Brit.


I was being sarcastic.
Clearly, much of what of is advertised is not widely-used because it is not widely-needed.
I also seem to recall a law was changed or passed in the not-so-distance past to allow this type of advertising in the first place. We didn't see this junk when we were much younger.
ID: 1729804 · Report as offensive
Profile JaundicedEye
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 12
Posts: 5375
Credit: 30,870,693
RAC: 1
United States
Message 1729824 - Posted: 28 Sep 2015, 16:45:27 UTC

The only advertising that exceeds that of Pharmaceuticals is that of the Pharmaceutical Mal-Practice attorneys..........any questions?

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>
ID: 1729824 · Report as offensive
Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 12273
Credit: 8,569,109
RAC: 79
United States
Message 1729871 - Posted: 28 Sep 2015, 19:04:00 UTC - in response to Message 1729824.  
Last modified: 28 Sep 2015, 19:04:33 UTC

The only advertising that exceeds that of Pharmaceuticals is that of the Pharmaceutical Mal-Practice attorneys..........any questions?


So obvious.
But it started around 1995 and was satirized in a great science fiction show.
Here is a ripoff of what was in that show. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6pMgPfvbjw.

"Comrade, comrade, get on down. Get that grain right into town.

"Pledge your support for public television ... or else. We know who you are."
ID: 1729871 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30651
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1729904 - Posted: 28 Sep 2015, 21:18:06 UTC - in response to Message 1729824.  

The only advertising that exceeds that of Pharmaceuticals is that of the Pharmaceutical Mal-Practice attorneys..........any questions?

SCOTUS did that for us when they said the State Bar Associations could not prevent shysters from advertising. Something about the First Amendment.
ID: 1729904 · Report as offensive
Profile Sarge
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Aug 99
Posts: 12273
Credit: 8,569,109
RAC: 79
United States
Message 1729936 - Posted: 28 Sep 2015, 23:12:14 UTC - in response to Message 1729904.  

The only advertising that exceeds that of Pharmaceuticals is that of the Pharmaceutical Mal-Practice attorneys..........any questions?

SCOTUS did that for us when they said the State Bar Associations could not prevent shysters from advertising. Something about the First Amendment.


Am I correct that was not too long before 1995?
ID: 1729936 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30651
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1730003 - Posted: 29 Sep 2015, 4:47:54 UTC - in response to Message 1729936.  

The only advertising that exceeds that of Pharmaceuticals is that of the Pharmaceutical Mal-Practice attorneys..........any questions?

SCOTUS did that for us when they said the State Bar Associations could not prevent shysters from advertising. Something about the First Amendment.


Am I correct that was not too long before 1995?

1977
http://www.mprnews.org/story/2007/07/05/lawyer_advertising
ID: 1730003 · Report as offensive
KLiK
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 14
Posts: 1304
Credit: 22,994,597
RAC: 60
Croatia
Message 1732494 - Posted: 7 Oct 2015, 8:36:45 UTC
Last modified: 7 Oct 2015, 8:36:55 UTC

ID: 1732494 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 7 · 8 · 9 · 10

Message boards : Politics : Big Pharmaceutical companies price gouging


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.