Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (100) Server Problems?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 . . . 32 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Rasputin42 Send message Joined: 25 Jul 08 Posts: 412 Credit: 5,834,661 RAC: 0 |
Both download and upload are set at a max of 1024 kilobytes/second in the web preferences, not doing overriding through local preferences.(*) Why limit it at all? I would always enter a value in it, because i do not trust setting it to zero (no restriction)works. Zero means nothing, so i rather put huge value in for no restriction (like 800Mbit/sec) edit: and there might be a bug in the download speed reduction, that nobody has discovered,yet. |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
Why limit it at all? Primarily because I am a BOINC alpha tester. And as already observed, it doesn't matter in this, as the download speeds I reach at Seti are nowhere near the limits I set. I just downloaded TGBBO at 21MB/sec through P2P, just goes to show that I easily reach those speeds. |
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 |
The problem with setting a value to zero in BOINC is that zero means three different things, depending on how that particular section of code was coded: A) literal, actual zero B) assume defaults C) disabled I try not to use zero unless I want it to be A or C. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
Rasputin42 Send message Joined: 25 Jul 08 Posts: 412 Credit: 5,834,661 RAC: 0 |
as the download speeds I reach at Seti are nowhere near the limits I set. edit: and there might be a bug in the download speed reduction, that nobody has discovered,yet So, try setting it(temporarily) to a very high value and see! |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
No value set for the download and upload values means no limit. Here's a list of uploads to please Rasputin... The first two are just done with no limits set on downloads and uploads. The second is one that was done earlier with the limits set. And the rest of them is uploads throughout the year, to show that there's not much difference in them speeds. Can't show you uploads yet as my cache is full. Will have to wait for that, but am pretty sure there's nothing changed there either. I must iterate that I am not looking for a solution to get a faster download or upload speed, these suit me fine. That I was showing the speeds I reach was in answer to Cosmic_Ocean's question if there was any speed difference seen between the previous Hurricane Electric connection and the one through Berkeley Campus Internet. I also must iterate that I know that around Berkeley there are exchanges that have a maximum speed of 5MBit up and down. It all depends on how you reach Berkeley, from what direction, how many hops between you and there and the speed of those hops. 29/08/2015 20:00:00 | SETI@home | Finished upload of 02au12aa.24066.3748.438086664208.12.163_1_0 29/08/2015 20:00:00 | SETI@home | [file_xfer] Throughput 14139 bytes/sec 29-Aug-2015 19:50:42 [SETI@home] Finished upload of 02au12ac.18332.5388.438086664206.12.170_0_0 29-Aug-2015 19:50:42 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 17434 bytes/sec 29-Aug-2015 02:15:35 [SETI@home] Finished upload of 31ja13ac.31505.24607.438086664208.12.128_1_0 29-Aug-2015 02:15:35 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 14321 bytes/sec 15-Aug-2015 17:56:19 [SETI@home] Finished upload of 02my15aa.914.6332.438086664203.12.237_1_0 15-Aug-2015 17:56:19 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 17961 bytes/sec 09-Aug-2015 16:17:06 [SETI@home] Finished upload of 10my15ab.7001.273960.438086664206.12.5_1_0 09-Aug-2015 16:17:06 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 17905 bytes/sec 27-May-2015 22:37:10 [SETI@home] Finished upload of 25oc12ad.1814.4975.438086664198.12.206_1_0 27-May-2015 22:37:10 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 21254 bytes/sec 10-Jan-2015 23:15:16 [SETI@home] Finished download of 20se12ae.9277.13564.438086664200.12.125 10-Jan-2015 23:15:16 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 191143 bytes/sec |
Rasputin42 Send message Joined: 25 Jul 08 Posts: 412 Credit: 5,834,661 RAC: 0 |
I must iterate that I am not looking for a solution to get a faster download or upload speed, these suit me fine. So, what are you looking for? |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
I must iterate that I am not looking for a solution to get a faster download or upload speed, these suit me fine. He posted it in his reply....... "That I was showing the speeds I reach was in answer to Cosmic_Ocean's question if there was any speed difference seen between the previous Hurricane Electric connection and the one through Berkeley Campus Internet." "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
Rasputin42 Send message Joined: 25 Jul 08 Posts: 412 Credit: 5,834,661 RAC: 0 |
If it is not causing any problems, why worry about it? |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
I can ask you that, since you continue to try to help me. :-) Where was I worrying about it? |
Rasputin42 Send message Joined: 25 Jul 08 Posts: 412 Credit: 5,834,661 RAC: 0 |
It was determined, that the speed is slower now. Case closed. |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14649 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
@Richard Here goes. This is my estimate of how much MB work has been processed with the SaH v7 app (including autocorrelations), and how much might conceivably remain to be reprocessed. The 'TOTAL' column is what I've posted in the data distribution thread, including new tapes received since the start of 2015. The v7 column is what I've done since the SaH v7 launch date (June 2013), and the v6 only column is the difference between the two. Looks like we've processed roughly 600 tapes since I last drew up this table - say 200 new tapes and 400 reprocessed (about 40 of the earlier tapes we're running through at the moment seem not to have been processed at all the first time round). Current figures: Recorded TOTAL Processed with Processed with SaH v7 (since Sah v6 only launch June 2013) (derived) 2007 350 4 346 2008 916 874 42 2009 548 456 92 2010 762 138 624 2011 1136 214 922 2012 846 819 27 2013 590 585 5 2014 259 259 n/a 2015 164 164 n/a Grand total 5571 3513 2058 Previous values (01 May 2015) Recorded TOTAL Processed with Processed with SaH v7 (since Sah v6 only launch June 2013) (derived) 2007 350 4 346 2008 911 869 42 2009 546 455 91 2010 748 99 649 2011 1121 147 974 2012 843 583 260 2013 588 536 52 2014 232 232 n/a Grand total 5339 2925 2414 |
Filipe Send message Joined: 12 Aug 00 Posts: 218 Credit: 21,281,677 RAC: 20 |
@Richard Thank you for taking the time to do this update. Much apreciated. |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11360 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
For those who did not notice besides our normal outrage today we were also treated to another one @ Einstein. |
tbret Send message Joined: 28 May 99 Posts: 3380 Credit: 296,162,071 RAC: 40 |
I, for one, really appreciate your taking your valuable time to do this. It is nice to know "how things are going." |
WezH Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 576 Credit: 67,033,957 RAC: 95 |
Hey, what's up? Nothing new "Panic Mode On (100) Server Problems?" in last 24 hours? :) I just HAD to post this :) |
Brent Norman Send message Joined: 1 Dec 99 Posts: 2786 Credit: 685,657,289 RAC: 835 |
Well this is strange, I have an AP download that is struggling at 0-5 KB download ... and then I got 3 more tasks that came in at 400-500 easily. First task has been going for 11 minutes. just got another task that zoomed right in. |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
Well this is strange, I have an AP download that is struggling at 0-5 KB download ... and then I got 3 more tasks that came in at 400-500 easily. I wasn't sure if those data sets would generate any actual AP work, but I already have ~150 new AP across my machines. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
WezH Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 576 Credit: 67,033,957 RAC: 95 |
No panic yet, but getting close: MB splitters are again struggling to keep up with demand, RTS has dropped to ~140K... |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14649 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
No panic yet, but getting close: While at the same time, the number of "Results out in the field" has grown to over 4.5 million - the highest number for over a year. The shorty storm will have contributed to that, but let's hope the database isn't getting infested by ghosts again. |
WezH Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 576 Credit: 67,033,957 RAC: 95 |
The shorty storm will have contributed to that, but let's hope the database isn't getting infested by ghosts again. And that new AP's haven't splitted since about midday 5th... |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.