For the sake of Humanity. How do we get rid of BOTH Sides?

That's usually resolved by war.
Do we want that?
The Donald are probably in favour of that.
Or perhaps sueing the lot:)

blame the republicans blame the republicans blame the republicans...

And the people who make this country work are tired of the misplaced blame.

For the items that Gary showed Republicans could be at fault, who do yu believe is at fault and why?

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

Progressives for the past 100 years... because they are not following the rules we all agreed upon any more.

Exactly!

Progressives for the past 100 years... because they are not following the rules we all agreed upon any more.

Nice and specific, just like Gary's.

Let's try something else. Do you agree with the comment:

Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.

? If so, how does a flat tax (or a flatter tax), indicate a higher consideration for labor?

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

You asked a very broad question, I gave you a very broad answer.

You like the truth, right? (but not the whole truth and nothing but the truth...)

Here's a fact:

Most democrats are felons.

Truth? Yes.

Here's my source.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/jail-survey-nearly-34-felons-register-as-democrats/article/2541412

Now I can repeat ad nauseam that most democrats are felons.

Your source does not support your statement. Your source says most felons register as democrats. The source says nothing about "most democrats".

Your repetition of an unsubstantiated comment will not make it any more true than the first time you made it.

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

Your repetition of an unsubstantiated comment will not make it any more true than the first time you made it.

works for democrats, the media and many in here.

Guy if what you say is true what do you think that says about you?

---

For the truth is much stranger even than it appears in the formal doctrine of the sin of pride. It is not only true that humility is a much wiser and more vigorous thing than pride. It is also true that vanity is a much wiser and more vigorous thing than pride. Vanity is social— it is almost a kind of comradeship; pride is solitary and uncivilized. Vanity is active; it desires the applause of infinite multitudes; pride is passive, desiring only the applause of one person, which it already has. Vanity is humorous, and can enjoy the joke even of itself; pride is dull, and cannot even smile.

-G. K. Chesterton. Heretics

Frankenstein is SO VAIN.

And We Are Having FUN, watching Future President RED BUTTON aka The Wall aka GET 'IM The HELL OUTTA HERE!, Smoke The Most BORING CANDIDATES in History.

Vanity and CONFIDENCE in '16, Frankenstein Gets Hustlin'Hussein and His Minions, OUTTA HERE!

---

May we All have a METAMORPHOSIS. REASON. GOoD JUDGEMENT and LOVE and ORDER!!!!!

It says I like to follow rules. If these are the rules you want to follow, then I'll follow them too.

Then explain this from the US goverment questionary to immigrants that should be easy to answer when being a american citizen.

What does "the rule of law" mean?
1. Everyone must follow the law.
2. All laws will be uniform in all States
3. All but the president must follow the law.
4. The government does not have to follow the law

Your repetition of an unsubstantiated comment will not make it any more true than the first time you made it.

works for democrats, the media and many in here.

Why do you believe it works for "many in here"? Can you provide any specific instances where repetition of an unsubstantiated comment has made it true for any of your fellow posters?

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

Edit:

Give up bobby, I'm not going to play any or your games.

Why do you believe a request for evidence is a "playing a game"? If you want others to be accountable for what they say and do, why shouldn't you also be held to account?

[EDIT]Apologies, the word originally used was "silly" instead of "playing a", arising from my conflating your use of game with the criticism of another poster, who objects to requests for evidence on the basis that such requests are "silly games".[/EDIT]

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

At this time, it's looking like "we the people" are going to consent to giving the white house to Donald Trump.

That cannot be considered as true yet. At the moment, because there are too many GOP candidates, the votes have been split any ways. So in most cases 40%, usually less, of the GOP voters have voted for Trump.

As the two parties usually get about the same number of votes in the final election for President. Then, as of now, at most, only 20% of the US population want Trump to be President.

And polling suggests that about 60% of the US population do not view Trump favourably.
Huffpost
Gallop

Easy. #1

Everyone means everyone, including those in positions of power. And our positions of power are not absolute. Our positions of power are allowed to govern because "we the people" give them consent to govern. If they do not follow the "rule of law," then "we the people" can remove them from their position of power.

Correct answer.
Sometimes I believe that Trump doesn't know the answer.
Maybe #3 is something he likes. All but the president must follow the law.
"Sue me if i'm wrong"

Very bad night for Trump in Chicago. Violence might cost him the election.

Soros Funded MoveOn.org Takes Credit for Violence in Chicago

Ilya Sheyman, a failed Illinois contender for Congress and the executive director of MoveOn.org Political Action, has taken credit for the violence at a cancelled Trump event last night in Chicago. He promised similar violence and disruption will occur at future Trump political events leading up to the election.

http://www.infowars.com/soros-funded-moveon-org-takes-credit-for-violence-in-chicago/

---

blame the republicans blame the republicans blame the republicans...

Too easy. I can do that in just a few short sentences.

Cruz/Rubio want to repeal Dodd-Frank. For anyone paying attention that's the equivalent of voting in Vladimir Putin as POTUS. To make matters worse, we all know they are both nowhere near as talented as Vladimir.

blame the republicans blame the republicans blame the republicans...

And the people who make this country work are tired of the misplaced blame

Since the republicans took the ball and went home in a huff that leaves the democrats to run the country, and they very well know who is to blame for running off in a huff and refusing to work so they see no misplaced blame.

When politicians and political powers say my way or else, what follows is usually an orgy of death and destruction. Personally I don't wish to see the USA subjected to an orgy of death and destruction; however, there are those who wish to manufacture an apocalypse, so they can have their pyrrhic victory and point to their book and claim moral high ground in the quicksand at the bottom of the latrine pit they dug, which will give them comfort as they starve to death without anyone to pick the farm crops to feed them.

Those who fail to compromise are at fault.

---