There no doubt about you Guy, but you still keep showing the rest of us what is really wrong with the U.S. of A. these days.

Cheers.

Because none of you cannot refute what I say, or refute what I quote others as saying, you digress into the Alinsky rules for radicals and insult me, and attack me with veiled threats (and the moderators allow this).

When I make a spelling mistake, some of you point it out with "[sic]" to try to invalidate what I say.

Your short-term thinking, which is encouraged by the mentality of the 140 character limit septic tank of twitter, is the natural cycle of civilizations.

You want two classes of people: those who are smart (who you claim to be a member of), who are exempt from manual labour [sic] and those who are stupid and *do* the manual labour [sic] which serves you.

NO I DO NOT!!! Nor do I support this. Thus, you are refuted,

Our founder lit the fire of individual freedom and fanned those flames greater than at any time in the history of human existence.

You'll never be able to extinguish it.

Trump is scary. Yes. But to continue with what we are doing is even more scary. Look at history. History has lessons. And because of your arrogance, you'd rather destroy everything around you than admit that there are some in history who are smarter than you.

You are ignoring some history yourself.

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

Believe 'No Name' 'is' A 'Law' 'Enforcement' 'Entity', Fishing fO Like-Minded.

Once Hooked, This 'Entity' will 'Decide' if 'Fish' 'is' 'Worth' 'Catching'.

Usually, 'Like' 'Minded' will be A 'Fish' Under 'Size' 'Limit' and 'Thrown' Back.

IOWs, usual WASTE of Time and 'Money'.

RED BUTTON Don fO Prez in '16

Yap.

CLYDE is the former officer, actually.
Guy is ex-Air Force and now teachers computer programming, or something along those lines.

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

Marco Rubio is being positioned as a moderate alternative to Ted Cruz or Donald Trump. Baloney.

edit:

BTW can someone explain to me why Hillary is so popular with African-American voters? What did I miss? Bernie seems to be the obvious choice (in my head, with the admittedly very little info it has on this particular subject right now).

Help me out.

Just thinking. Trump wants to divide. Build walls and fences. Nothing about uniting, just divide. Like divide and conquer. Just thinking about the bundle of sticks. An individual stick is easy to break. The united bundle can't be broken. Trump's plan isn't to make America Great again, it is to make America weak, broken and destroyed.

---

Crystal ball mode on again:

Is it really gonna be Donald and Hillary after today? And if it is, can Hillary Rumble in the Trump Jungle 'till election day? Can she Rope-a-Dope Trump's psycho-babble 'till November?

I would have loved to watch Bernie stare at Trump with a "you poor boy" look on his face these following months but most people seem to think Hillary is going to kill it in the South. Damn.

@No-Name Guy:

I suspect many in here are unaware of the downfall of the U.S.A. ...

Those who are unaware of the USA's downfall are in good company.

So lets (sic) all just go ahead and vote with our vaginas ...

This comment is beneath contempt.

When I make a spelling mistake, some of you point it out with "[sic]" to try to invalidate what I say.

My intention by including (sic) was certainly not to invalidate what you say. It was merely to indicate that I was quoting you "as it was written". I have done so before when posting to these message boards. You can check my posting history to confirm this. (Unlike yours (--), my posting history is complete). I have used "sic" twice more in this post, with the same, benign, intention.

Your short-term thinking ... is encouraged by the mentality of the 140 character limit septic tank of twitter (sic) ...

Twitter is what Twitter is. Some parts may be septic, but Twitter is the first place I go to track breaking news stories; it is also a useful barometer of public opinion, a great way to communicate with a variety of people that one has no access to otherwise, and, in my local context, I find it a very useful tool for mobilising public services almost instantaneously. Making oneself understood in 140 characters can be a challenge, but I understand that may change soon.

You want two classes of people: those who are smart (who you claim to be a member of), who are exempt from manual labour [sic] and those who are stupid and *do* the manual labour [sic] which serves you.

Two points:
1. Where I live, labour is the correct spelling; where you live, it is not.
2. Your statement is speculative and, if applied to me, completely false. I refute it.

@MajorKong:

Now that is just Guy restating the 'cold, dead hands' response to disarmament.

A philosophic stance that I share.

It's not so much the stance itself, but rather the fact that someone thinks that this scenario might realistically come to pass, that is scary!

---

@MajorKong:

Now that is just Guy restating the 'cold, dead hands' response to disarmament.

A philosophic stance that I share.

It's not so much the stance itself, but rather the fact that someone thinks that this scenario might realistically come to pass, that is scary!

Oh, it is going to come to pass. No way to avoid it, shy of another outbreak of 'When in the course of human events...'. And, yes, you should be 'scared'.


I mean, think about it...

If one of the most basic of natural human rights can be successfully... removed... in the nation where it is most zealously guarded...

What hope is there for any of them to be retained... anywhere?

Now that is just Guy restating the 'cold, dead hands' response to disarmament.

A philosophic stance that I share.

It's not so much the stance itself, but rather the fact that someone thinks that this scenario might realistically come to pass, that is scary!

Some people want it to happen in the next hour and are doing everything they can to make it happen.

I'm not convinced it will happen again. A foreign action is about as likely. Especially considering Mr. Thomas asking questions yesterday.

---

Trump just finished a rally here in Louisville. The news said there were a lot of protesters, but it looks like there were far many more cheering him on.

---

The mind is a weird and mysterious place

...a rally here in Louisville.

GET 'EM OUTTA HERE!

Watched last 20 minutes of above mentioned Rally.

LOVE RED BUTTON Don sayin' GET 'IM OUTTA HERE!, 'bout DEM Protestors.

FanFookin'Tastic! or As Don Said: 'Incredible'.

Yap.

---

May we All have a METAMORPHOSIS. REASON. GOoD JUDGEMENT and LOVE and ORDER!!!!!

What a sad choice, Hillary or Donald.

---

Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.

The Missing Story of the 2014 Election.

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

What a sad choice, Hillary or Donald.

Can they both be indicted before it is too late?

---

If this doesn't put a smile on your face, I don't know what will.

Compared to Bush, Donald Trump is a Rutherford or an Einstein.

"And all of the Beltway's hooting and hollering about how "embarrassing" and "dangerous" Trump is will fall on deaf ears, because as gullible as Americans can be, they're smart enough to remember being told that it was OK to vote for George Bush, a man capable of losing at tic-tac-toe.

Madison and Jefferson never foresaw this situation. They knew there was danger of demagoguery, but they never imagined presidential candidates exchanging "mine's bigger than yours" jokes or doing "let's laugh at the disabled" routines. There's no map in the Constitution to tell us how to get out of where we're going. All we can do now is hold on."

If this doesn't put a smile on your face, I don't know what will.

Compared to Bush, Donald Trump is a Rutherford or an Einstein.

"And all of the Beltway's hooting and hollering about how "embarrassing" and "dangerous" Trump is will fall on deaf ears, because as gullible as Americans can be, they're smart enough to remember being told that it was OK to vote for George Bush, a man capable of losing at tic-tac-toe.

Madison and Jefferson never foresaw this situation. They knew there was danger of demagoguery, but they never imagined presidential candidates exchanging "mine's bigger than yours" jokes or doing "let's laugh at the disabled" routines. There's no map in the Constitution to tell us how to get out of where we're going. All we can do now is hold on."

Heh...

Still 'blaming Bush'..... bloody Democrats.


I did not support Bush (either the Elder or the Younger) for President, for quite a number of reasons. But, Bush the Younger was NOT a 'stupid idiot'.

Yes, Bush the Younger's presidency was an unmitigated disaster, but for reasons you might not think.

Bush the Younger was too much of a Progressive 'modern-Liberal'. His two signature achievements in domestic policy were NCLB (No Child Left Behind, a HUGE power-grab by the US Federal Government into the State/Local Government arena of public education) and Medicare 'Part D' (a VAST expansion of the social-welfare state in the USA which greatly added to the Unfunded liabilities of the Federal Government). Future generations are going to be cussing Bush's name when they see how much of their paychecks are going to have to be withheld for taxes to pay for that schizz, assuming they have jobs at all...

Re: Bush's getting place names wrong... Show me a President since Nixon that hasn't gotten a few place names wrong... Heck, I remember former Sec. of State Clinton doing that a few times, while she was Sec. of State... Heh heh... The chief diplomat of the USA didn't even know what Nation she was in on a visit on a couple of occasions... In other words... big fat hairy deal.

I would not put the 'beginning of the end' of the GOP on Bush the Younger. It goes back quite a bit further.

Tricky-Dick Nixon's naughtiness could be seen as the beginning of it. The American people lost a lot of respect for the GOP during that scandal. The Democrat party tasted blood, and like a pit-bull they have not let go of it yet.

Also, Nixon's successor Ford was kind of not-the-best. Reagan's Presidency was a problem too. The Congressional Democrats allowed his tax cuts but refused much of the rest of his economic program (the Government spending cuts). And Reagan was WAY too willing to compromise with the Democrats, and actually undid much of the good that even the tax cuts did with one of the largest tax increases up to that point. A feat surpassed by Reagan's successor, Bush the Elder (even after his pledge 'read my lips... no new taxes'). Remember, a compromise with the Progressive/modern-liberals is a victory for the Progressive/modern-liberals, and a loss for the minarchists and other conservatives.

Much of the American people lost faith with the GOP during the Reagan years, myself included.

No, Dubya didn't help... but he did NOT start the process. Dubya wasn't even honest on the situtation, and tried to disguise his Progressive/modern-liberalism by calling it 'compassionate conservatism' in an attempt to keep pulling the wool over the eyes of the conservative power base of the post-Goldwater republican party.


But a foolish idiot Dubya was NOT.

Neither is Trump.

Back to the thread subject. It is beginning to look like it is gonna be Trump vs. Clinton for the two major parties in the general election this fall... Urrgh.

This election looks like it is going to have to be a choice between two evils. But how do you choose which one is the lesser of the two evils when one is Asmodeus and the other is Mephistopheles?

The American people need to do themselves, their descendants, and the rest of the world a favor and NOT vote for either the Democrats or the Republicans this fall. Go find a 3rd party you can support, and cast your votes for them. Which one? I don't care. ANYTHING other than the D's or the R's.

The Dixiecrats are in full control of the Republican party. They shall now have their candidate Donald "George Wallace" Trump burst forth upon the land. The result will be the same as the last time the Dixiecrats were in control of the Democrats.

---

I have been away, but I hear that the Donald is doing well...

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA !!

---

I have been away, but I hear that the Donald is doing well...

Why yes, Donald "Seize Canada and make them pay for it" Trump is doing good in the polls. Be afraid, be very afraid.

---

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/fox-news-donald-trump-cape-breton-canada-americans-moving-1.3470962

If you pass the audition you may enter....

:):)



edit:
http://cbiftrumpwins.com/#intro

---