Then Both Clintons, All Politicians, Fox, CNN, et al, should be in jail.

You said that, I cannot comment;-)

Then Both Clintons, All Politicians, Fox, CNN, et al, should be in jail.

You said that, I cannot comment;-)

Of course not.

WinterKnight...

Never apply your beliefs upon your Political Enemies. You would not wish to apply to your Political Friends.

You have Political Friends!!!

Unbelievable

Then Both Clintons, All Politicians, Fox, CNN, et al, should be in jail.

You said that, I cannot comment;-)

Of course not.

WinterKnight...

Never apply your beliefs upon your Political Enemies. You would not wish to apply to your Political Friends.

You have Political Friends!!!

Unbelievable

Nope.

You mentioned Trump and Fox. Leaving out The Clintons and CNN.

I just entered your Universe. And pointed out the danger of your beliefs.

Nothing more. Nothing less. ;)

This is a thread about Donald, If you want comments on the Clintons then start a new thread.

In the meantime I see Donald is also hypocritical.

The billionaire has a rocky history with the United Kingdom, particularly in Scotland. The 2011 documentary You’ve Been Trumped, by British director Anthony Baxter, depicts Trump’s tempestuous relationship with local residents in a town in Scotland where he had built a luxury golf course. Trump’s lawyers tried to block the film from the BBC on grounds that it was “defamatory” and “deliberately misleading.”

From Time, British Lawmakers to Debate Call to Ban Donald Trump from U.K.

In the meantime I see Donald is also hypocritical.

The billionaire has a rocky history with the United Kingdom, particularly in Scotland. The 2011 documentary You’ve Been Trumped, by British director Anthony Baxter, depicts Trump’s tempestuous relationship with local residents in a town in Scotland where he had built a luxury golf course. Trump’s lawyers tried to block the film from the BBC on grounds that it was “defamatory” and “deliberately misleading.”

From Time, British Lawmakers to Debate Call to Ban Donald Trump from U.K.

Not only hypocritical!
He belives that you if rich enough you can do anything.

Donald Trump has lost a battle against the government owned Swedish energy company Vattenfall.
Trump has tried for several years to stop Vattenfall's windmills outside his golf course in the Scottish Aberdeen.
Now, however, Britain's highest court rejected Trump's appeal to stop Vattenfall's planned facility, which according Trump would spoil the view from the billion investment.
- A unanimous court rejects the appeal, said Patrick Hodge, Judge of the Supreme Court. The Court states that the Scottish authorities acted in unity with the rules and within its mandate when given Vattenfall the approval, writes Dagens Nyheter.
Compared with the Lockerbie disaster
Donald Trump has since 2012 challenged it in all Scottish courts. He has compared the planned eleven windmills with the Pan Am 103 which crashed in 1988 in Lockerbie Scotland after being blown up in a terrorist attack. All 259 people died.
"You will be on your own to inflict Scotland more damage than any event in the whole of the Scottish history," wrote Donald Trump to then Minister Alex Salmond who was behind the wind decision.

And the Scottish neighbours had their view blocked as well because Trump has now planted trees around his golf course!
Well the Trump answer to this will probably be "Sue me".

Disingenuous. But...

How?

He wants to block a TV program using English laws, which are absolutely 100% the opposite of the 1st Ammendment.

Disingenuous. But...

How?

He wants to block a TV program using English laws, which are absolutely 100% the opposite of the 1st Ammendment.

Why, that's acting like a lawyer. Use every trick in the book and invent a few new ones to put in the book while speaking with a forked tongue while wearing several hats. Oh, that's politician defined.

---

Lawyers:)
Why don't they run for office?

Lawyers:)
Why don't they run for office?

Because they make too much money in "other" ways.

Disingenuous. But...

How?

He wants to block a TV program using English laws, which are absolutely 100% the opposite of the 1st Ammendment.

Why, that's acting like a lawyer. Use every trick in the book and invent a few new ones to put in the book while speaking with a forked tongue while wearing several hats. Oh, that's politician defined.

I think we all knew that.

You mentioned Trump and Fox. Leaving out The Clintons and CNN.

I just entered your Universe. And pointed out the danger of your beliefs.

Nothing more. Nothing less. ;)

This is a thread about Donald, If you want comments on the Clintons then start a new thread.

Disingenuous. But...

No emphasis added.
Any clearer now?

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

We don’t need someone having any guts to lead; what we need is someone pretty enough to be a leader; if there's a blemish on a candidate: they're right out.

The DNC chairperson, the DNC heir-presumptive could not distinguish themselves from their opponent, i.e., a self-avowed socialist.

Donald Trump is going to 'destroy' the status quo. Donald Trump is NOT a conservative, albiet right of center. He's going to destroy the GOPe, i.e., the Stupid Party, the party that never plays offense.

The GOPe is akin to a baseball game where one team never takes their at-bat's; they're afraid of being deemed racist.

The GOPe mantra: OUR brand's plan to spend your money is better than the competition's plan to spend your money - we just wait a little bit longer to sell out - and by the way: we'll need more of your money to spend our way.

In the past this always resulted in the formation of a new party. That notwithstanding, the party of power will either adopt planks of the impugning party or go belly up.

What remains to be seen: will the Demoncraps field candidates that are not geriatric, or will the GOP pull planks from the Donald Trump party so as to remain viable power center?

All I see when looking at the current Demoncrap party is a bunch of Occupy Wall Street hooligans; that's their base.

Just a quickie, no time for debate.

Why does Trump want to build a wall along the Mexican border. To keep illegal immigrants out or to keep them in the US, because he and his friends need the cheap labour.

U.S. illegal immigrant population falls below 11 million, continuing nearly decade-long decline, report says

Until recent years, illegal immigrants tended to be young men streaming across the Southern border in pursuit of work. But demographic data show that the typical illegal immigrant now is much more likely someone who is 35 or older and has lived in the United States for a decade or more.

10 years ago or more, that would be in the period of that famously liberal president G W Bush then.

Pew Research - More Mexicans Leaving Than Coming to the U.S.

Net Loss of 140,000 from 2009 to 2014; Family Reunification Top Reason for Return

From 2009 to 2014, 1 million Mexicans and their families (including U.S.-born children) left the U.S. for Mexico

So in 30 years or more the headlines will be about a candidate who others will claim is a Mexican, when all the time (s)he is a natural born American.

If Trump wins then not only will the U.S of A. go further down the drain than it is now (and some of us foreigners will just laugh more with that comedy), but international relations may just become non-existent (It'll be just another Russia then). :-O

Are the generally sensible of those country-persons of yours going to let the fearful, greedy, self-centered and "I'm superior to the rest of yous" people take your country down that path?

Are they stupid enough to let him?

I (along with many others) certainly hope not.

Cheers.

Trump/Palin?

---

The mind is a weird and mysterious place

Trump/Palin?

Why not...LOL.
Although I think she is a bit out of the loop.

Trump/Cruz maybe.

---

"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

Trump/Cruz maybe

I don't see that. Even if Trump gets Iowa, and New Hampshire, I think his running mate is who he will need help from to actually win the presidency, and I'm not saying Palin is the answer, but they seem to get along fairly well, and chemistry on a ticket buys votes in the grand scheme of things.

---

The mind is a weird and mysterious place

Trump/Cruz maybe

I don't see that. Even if Trump gets Iowa, and New Hampshire, I think his running mate is who he will need help from to actually win the presidency, and I'm not saying Palin is the answer, but they seem to get along fairly well, and chemistry on a ticket buys votes in the grand scheme of things.

I dunno.........Palin is really old news, and I do not see her helping Trump at all.
Just my opinion, I guess.

---

"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

I dunno.........Palin is really old news, and I do not see her helping Trump at all.
Just my opinion, I guess.

He's been very friendly with her, and nothing would surprise me.

---

The mind is a weird and mysterious place

I dunno.........Palin is really old news, and I do not see her helping Trump at all.
Just my opinion, I guess.

He's been very friendly with her, and nothing would surprise me.

Who else do you see running???

I happen to think that Hillary is damaged goods, and shall NOT survive it to see the preliminaries. I know she does not believe it will catch up with her, and continues to campaign like nothing at all is going on...
But it IS going to catch up with her, she may be indicted soon.

Now that leaves...

---

"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster