Anything relating to AstroPulse tasks

Message boards : Number crunching : Anything relating to AstroPulse tasks
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 58 · 59 · 60 · 61 · 62 · 63 · 64 . . . 120 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile JaundicedEye
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 12
Posts: 5375
Credit: 30,870,693
RAC: 1
United States
Message 1815012 - Posted: 4 Sep 2016, 15:27:37 UTC
Last modified: 4 Sep 2016, 15:49:14 UTC

I picked up 110 on one machine and have just suspended everything other than AP processing. I'm curious to see what I've actually got. Combo of CPU and Intel and Nvidia GPU(not that it should make a difference if it's a GIGO problem).

Maybe it's a Subversive Plot to generate low AP credits thereby encouraging less 'AP Specializers'(myself included).....":D>

[edit] Well that was like giving my processors a laxative..........flushed the cache at an average of 3 sec a wu. Definitely a data GIGO problem.

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>
ID: 1815012 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11361
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1815017 - Posted: 4 Sep 2016, 16:03:50 UTC

One box had 74 and 1 wasn't totally blanked, it got 592 credits another box got 25 all totally blanked, the 3rd box hasn't started on it's 44. The up side is you don't waste much time on this garbage.
ID: 1815017 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14650
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 1815027 - Posted: 4 Sep 2016, 17:01:57 UTC - in response to Message 1815017.  

One box had 74 and 1 wasn't totally blanked, it got 592 credits another box got 25 all totally blanked, the 3rd box hasn't started on it's 44. The up side is you don't waste much time on this garbage.

Just a lot of bandwidth...

Has anybody applied the compressibility test to the datafiles, to find put if it's just an extreme version of the B3_P1 problem?
ID: 1815027 · Report as offensive
Kiska
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 12
Posts: 302
Credit: 3,067,762
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1815040 - Posted: 4 Sep 2016, 17:59:17 UTC - in response to Message 1815027.  

here is an ap b3_p1 if you would like to try it
ID: 1815040 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14650
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 1815047 - Posted: 4 Sep 2016, 18:33:34 UTC - in response to Message 1815040.  
Last modified: 4 Sep 2016, 18:33:56 UTC

here is an ap b3_p1 if you would like to try it

Well, that 8,196 KB file compresses to 4,427 KB (Windows implementation of ZIP algorithm) or 4,088 KB (7-zip). Those values are indicative of the 'stuck bit' error which has plagued us for many years - believed to be a fault in the digital recording system at Arecibo, and not indicative of radar contamination at all. The question is - how many of the 13 other channels (7 beams, 2 polarisations of each beam) are suffering from the same problem? Intact 8-bit recordings should be barely compressible at all.
ID: 1815047 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11361
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1815050 - Posted: 4 Sep 2016, 18:36:33 UTC
Last modified: 4 Sep 2016, 18:45:15 UTC

For frosting on the cake the remaining 44 were 100% blanked. Taking a closer look at the one that wasn't blanked LOL it was a resend originally created 24 Aug 2016.
ID: 1815050 · Report as offensive
Profile Bill G Special Project $75 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Jun 01
Posts: 1282
Credit: 187,688,550
RAC: 182
United States
Message 1815065 - Posted: 4 Sep 2016, 19:59:08 UTC - in response to Message 1815050.  
Last modified: 4 Sep 2016, 19:59:58 UTC

For frosting on the cake the remaining 44 were 100% blanked. Taking a closer look at the one that wasn't blanked LOL it was a resend originally created 24 Aug 2016.

That was probably one of mine originally as that was the date I abandoned a whole bunch because Windows updated and the drivers reverted.....

SETI@home classic workunits 4,019
SETI@home classic CPU time 34,348 hours
ID: 1815065 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11361
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1815083 - Posted: 4 Sep 2016, 23:19:13 UTC - in response to Message 1815065.  

I checked, it wasn't one of yours but if you have any to spare I would gladly take some.
ID: 1815083 · Report as offensive
Cosmic_Ocean
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Dec 00
Posts: 3027
Credit: 13,516,867
RAC: 13
United States
Message 1816123 - Posted: 10 Sep 2016, 8:28:40 UTC

Hey, a couple tapes got loaded, and they're actually producing real WUs. Apparently it's been a run for a few hours. It's 430am and I just noticed I have 4 in my cache and they've been crunching for about 3 hours.

I'll see if I can get a few more before this run ends. It looks like there's only one tape left to split and it doesn't take long when there are 4 splitters working on one tape.
Linux laptop:
record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up)
ID: 1816123 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14650
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 1816124 - Posted: 10 Sep 2016, 8:34:09 UTC

Did anyone ever work out whether the 2016 tapes were 'radar_blanked' or 'bit_stuck'?
ID: 1816124 · Report as offensive
Profile JaundicedEye
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 12
Posts: 5375
Credit: 30,870,693
RAC: 1
United States
Message 1816159 - Posted: 10 Sep 2016, 15:41:43 UTC

I managed to snag 9 out of that run, what is usable remains to be seen....

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>
ID: 1816159 · Report as offensive
Profile Bill G Special Project $75 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Jun 01
Posts: 1282
Credit: 187,688,550
RAC: 182
United States
Message 1816164 - Posted: 10 Sep 2016, 16:18:40 UTC - in response to Message 1816124.  
Last modified: 10 Sep 2016, 16:19:31 UTC

Did anyone ever work out whether the 2016 tapes were 'radar_blanked' or 'bit_stuck'?

Stderr says 100% blanked. I do not know if that is accurate or not.
See: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=5134438797

SETI@home classic workunits 4,019
SETI@home classic CPU time 34,348 hours
ID: 1816164 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14650
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 1816169 - Posted: 10 Sep 2016, 17:16:00 UTC - in response to Message 1816164.  

Did anyone ever work out whether the 2016 tapes were 'radar_blanked' or 'bit_stuck'?

Stderr says 100% blanked. I do not know if that is accurate or not.
See: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=5134438797

Stderr says the same thing, whether the task is blanked or the data bit is stuck. That's why I asked people to apply the compression test (some way down this thread, by now) - but that can only be done while the tasks are cached on your machines, or (for a very short time) in progress. By the time you can read stderr, it's too late.
ID: 1816169 · Report as offensive
Profile Bill G Special Project $75 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Jun 01
Posts: 1282
Credit: 187,688,550
RAC: 182
United States
Message 1816179 - Posted: 10 Sep 2016, 18:38:56 UTC - in response to Message 1816169.  


Stderr says the same thing, whether the task is blanked or the data bit is stuck. That's why I asked people to apply the compression test (some way down this thread, by now) - but that can only be done while the tasks are cached on your machines, or (for a very short time) in progress. By the time you can read stderr, it's too late.

Understood

SETI@home classic workunits 4,019
SETI@home classic CPU time 34,348 hours
ID: 1816179 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11361
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1816439 - Posted: 11 Sep 2016, 16:04:23 UTC

It looks like the recent mini run was not totally radar blanked, as Captain Obvious I deem that to be a good thing.
ID: 1816439 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14650
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 1816449 - Posted: 11 Sep 2016, 16:27:50 UTC - in response to Message 1816439.  

It looks like the recent mini run was not totally radar blanked, as Captain Obvious I deem that to be a good thing.

By that, do you mean the recent block of tasks from 2009 tapes, such as the ones that the MB splitters are still working through?

If so, it still doesn't allay my fears of a possible antenna or recorder problem rendering all tapes from 2016 as useless for Astropulse.
ID: 1816449 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11361
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1816455 - Posted: 11 Sep 2016, 16:50:45 UTC - in response to Message 1816449.  

Well it does eliminate server problems doesn't it?
ID: 1816455 · Report as offensive
Cosmic_Ocean
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Dec 00
Posts: 3027
Credit: 13,516,867
RAC: 13
United States
Message 1816485 - Posted: 11 Sep 2016, 19:52:35 UTC

That's what I was thinking. They were, indeed, 2009 tapes, and they produced usable WUs, which I believe eliminates a problem with the splitters.

Pretty sure that just means that the 2016 tapes have something wrong with them if APs are 100% blanked for every channel and every WU. Figuring out what the problem is.. is a whole other can of worms. Is it the receiver? Is it the recording hardware?

I thought I remembered reading Matt explain a long while back that one of the channels was used solely to say when radar was happening, so that channel could be used as an overlay to all the others for blanking. Could it be that channel has glitched-out, or was there a slight tweak/format change in how the data is written to disk, and that is what's making all channels useless when the tape goes through the RFI cleaner before being loaded as a tape to split?
Linux laptop:
record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up)
ID: 1816485 · Report as offensive
raydar115

Send message
Joined: 6 Oct 02
Posts: 17
Credit: 16,305,128
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1817002 - Posted: 14 Sep 2016, 2:09:50 UTC

I was wondering if anybody can help me with this I have not changed anything for several months since I installed Lunatics. I don't know much about computers so any help would be appreciated thanks
I got this in my notice section of my bionic
SETI@home: Notice from server
Unknown app name setiathome_v7 in app_info.xml
9/13/2016 8:26:38 PM
This is in my log file
9/13/2016 8:39:03 PM | SETI@home | Message from server: Unknown app name setiathome_v7 in app_info.xml
This is my cc config file

<cc_config>
<log_flags>
<file_xfer>1</file_xfer>
<sched_ops>1</sched_ops>
<task>1</task>
<android_debug>0</android_debug>
<app_msg_receive>0</app_msg_receive>
<app_msg_send>0</app_msg_send>
<async_file_debug>0</async_file_debug>
<benchmark_debug>0</benchmark_debug>
<checkpoint_debug>0</checkpoint_debug>
<coproc_debug>0</coproc_debug>
<cpu_sched>0</cpu_sched>
<cpu_sched_debug>0</cpu_sched_debug>
<cpu_sched_status>0</cpu_sched_status>
<dcf_debug>0</dcf_debug>
<disk_usage_debug>0</disk_usage_debug>
<file_xfer_debug>0</file_xfer_debug>
<gui_rpc_debug>0</gui_rpc_debug>
<heartbeat_debug>0</heartbeat_debug>
<http_debug>0</http_debug>
<http_xfer_debug>0</http_xfer_debug>
<mem_usage_debug>0</mem_usage_debug>
<network_status_debug>0</network_status_debug>
<notice_debug>0</notice_debug>
<poll_debug>0</poll_debug>
<priority_debug>0</priority_debug>
<proxy_debug>0</proxy_debug>
<rr_simulation>0</rr_simulation>
<rrsim_detail>0</rrsim_detail>
<sched_op_debug>0</sched_op_debug>
<scrsave_debug>0</scrsave_debug>
<slot_debug>0</slot_debug>
<state_debug>0</state_debug>
<statefile_debug>0</statefile_debug>
<suspend_debug>0</suspend_debug>
<task_debug>0</task_debug>
<time_debug>0</time_debug>
<trickle_debug>0</trickle_debug>
<unparsed_xml>0</unparsed_xml>
<work_fetch_debug>0</work_fetch_debug>
</log_flags>
<options>
<abort_jobs_on_exit>0</abort_jobs_on_exit>
<allow_multiple_clients>0</allow_multiple_clients>
<allow_remote_gui_rpc>0</allow_remote_gui_rpc>
<client_version_check_url>http://boinc.berkeley.edu/download.php?xml=1</client_version_check_url>
<client_new_version_text></client_new_version_text>
<client_download_url>http://boinc.berkeley.edu/download.php</client_download_url>
<disallow_attach>0</disallow_attach>
<dont_check_file_sizes>0</dont_check_file_sizes>
<dont_contact_ref_site>0</dont_contact_ref_site>
<dont_use_vbox>0</dont_use_vbox>
<exit_after_finish>0</exit_after_finish>
<exit_before_start>0</exit_before_start>
<exit_when_idle>0</exit_when_idle>
<fetch_minimal_work>0</fetch_minimal_work>
<fetch_on_update>0</fetch_on_update>
<force_auth>default</force_auth>
<http_1_0>0</http_1_0>
<http_transfer_timeout>300</http_transfer_timeout>
<http_transfer_timeout_bps>10</http_transfer_timeout_bps>
<max_event_log_lines>2000</max_event_log_lines>
<max_file_xfers>8</max_file_xfers>
<max_file_xfers_per_project>2</max_file_xfers_per_project>
<max_stderr_file_size>0</max_stderr_file_size>
<max_stdout_file_size>0</max_stdout_file_size>
<max_tasks_reported>0</max_tasks_reported>
<ncpus>-1</ncpus>
<network_test_url>http://www.google.com/</network_test_url>
<no_alt_platform>0</no_alt_platform>
<no_gpus>0</no_gpus>
<no_info_fetch>0</no_info_fetch>
<no_priority_change>0</no_priority_change>
<os_random_only>0</os_random_only>
<proxy_info>
<socks_server_name></socks_server_name>
<socks_server_port>80</socks_server_port>
<http_server_name></http_server_name>
<http_server_port>80</http_server_port>
<socks5_user_name></socks5_user_name>
<socks5_user_passwd></socks5_user_passwd>
<http_user_name></http_user_name>
<http_user_passwd></http_user_passwd>
<no_proxy></no_proxy>
</proxy_info>
<rec_half_life_days>10.000000</rec_half_life_days>
<report_results_immediately>0</report_results_immediately>
<run_apps_manually>0</run_apps_manually>
<save_stats_days>30</save_stats_days>
<skip_cpu_benchmarks>0</skip_cpu_benchmarks>
<simple_gui_only>0</simple_gui_only>
<start_delay>0.000000</start_delay>
<stderr_head>0</stderr_head>
<suppress_net_info>0</suppress_net_info>
<unsigned_apps_ok>0</unsigned_apps_ok>
<use_all_gpus>0</use_all_gpus>
<use_certs>0</use_certs>
<use_certs_only>0</use_certs_only>
<vbox_window>0</vbox_window>
</options>
</cc_config>
ID: 1817002 · Report as offensive
Profile Jimbocous Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Apr 13
Posts: 1853
Credit: 268,616,081
RAC: 1,349
United States
Message 1817010 - Posted: 14 Sep 2016, 2:19:17 UTC - in response to Message 1817002.  

I was wondering if anybody can help me with this I have not changed anything for several months since I installed Lunatics. I don't know much about computers so any help would be appreciated thanks
I got this in my notice section of my bionic
SETI@home: Notice from server
Unknown app name setiathome_v7 in app_info.xml
9/13/2016 8:26:38 PM
This is in my log file
9/13/2016 8:39:03 PM | SETI@home | Message from server: Unknown app name setiathome_v7 in app_info.xml
This is my cc config file

<cc_config>
...
</cc_config>


Hi, cc_config won't help you here, the issue is in your app_info.xml file, located in the ... BOINC\projects\setiathome.berkeley.edu directory.
Look for a section starting
<app>
<name>setiathome_v7</name>
and get rid of all <app> and <app_version> segments that refer to <app_name>setiathome_v7</app_name>.

Be very careful not to get confused with <app_name>astropulse_v7</app_name>, it's easy to do.

Or, for a better time, run the Lunatics 0.44 installer, which will rewrite all this stuff.

Later, Jim ...
ID: 1817010 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 58 · 59 · 60 · 61 · 62 · 63 · 64 . . . 120 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Anything relating to AstroPulse tasks


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.