AMD Fury X, anyone interested?
Message boards :
Number crunching :
AMD Fury X, anyone interested?
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Todderbert  Send message Joined: 17 Jun 99 Posts: 221 Credit: 53,153,779 RAC: 0 
|
I am interested in the water cooled one.   
ID: 1689903 ·  |
|
woohoo Send message Joined: 30 Oct 13 Posts: 972 Credit: 165,671,404 RAC: 5
|
but there's a fire sale on the 295x2 ID: 1689905 · |
Admiral Gloval  Send message Joined: 31 Mar 13 Posts: 20263 Credit: 5,308,449 RAC: 0
|
Googled a 295X2. Over $600.00. To rich for me. Fire sale? Burn my bank account down. LOL.  
ID: 1689913 · |
|
woohoo Send message Joined: 30 Oct 13 Posts: 972 Credit: 165,671,404 RAC: 5
|
original launch price of a 295x2 was $1,499. $580 now so 19.78 GFLOPS/$ 290x is now $330 so 17.06 GFLOPS/$ ID: 1689925 · |
zoom3+1=4  Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65745 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49
 |
Googled a 295X2. Over $600.00. To rich for me. Fire sale? Burn my bank account down. LOL. Not to mention what one would do to ones electric bill every month. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's 
ID: 1689927 · |
|
woohoo Send message Joined: 30 Oct 13 Posts: 972 Credit: 165,671,404 RAC: 5
|
it depends on how you look at it, a 295x2 can be considered as comparable in efficiency to a 750 Ti. So with a 295x2 at 11.5 TFLOPS and a 750 Ti at 1.3 TFLOPS, you almost need a nine pack of 750 Tis to match perfomance. A nine pack of 750 Tis costs just a little more than a 295x2, plus the nine cards would use just a little more power than a 295x2. And of course it's so easy to set up a cruncher with a nine pack of anything, I can do it in my sleep. ID: 1689943 · |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.