https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPAYZMzGMwQ

Seems like it takes an awful lot, in a small area to just melt a car. Any Thermite paint would have had to been applied at the construction, and be almost a foot think.

Steve

---

Warning, addicted to SETI crunching!
Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group.
GPUUG Website

In actuality, building 7 was just physics. Each deck that collapsed added weight, and inertia to the moving system, and the support beams couldn't handle it.

Steve

---

Warning, addicted to SETI crunching!
Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group.
GPUUG Website

In actuality, building 7 was just physics. Each deck that collapsed added weight, and inertia to the moving system, and the support beams couldn't handle it.

Steve

Weight? No. After all when it was standing still all the weight was there. So that is the mass component. Inertia, yes. As the floor above fell it picked up kinetic energy so when it met resistance of the floor below the supports could not handle it and they snap and the building pancakes. Happens in earthquakes as well.

---

Correct.

Steve

---

Warning, addicted to SETI crunching!
Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group.
GPUUG Website

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPAYZMzGMwQ

Seems like it takes an awful lot, in a small area to just melt a car. Any Thermite paint would have had to been applied at the construction, and be almost a foot think.

Steve

Steve, Even if they did use foot thick paint would not some trace of thermite have been left behind? A chemical by product that would have said Thermite was used.
I know fire investigators can find traces of any liguid fuel that was used. Surely thermite would leave a signature.

---

[/quote]

Old James

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPAYZMzGMwQ

Seems like it takes an awful lot, in a small area to just melt a car. Any Thermite paint would have had to been applied at the construction, and be almost a foot think.

Steve

Steve, Even if they did use foot thick paint would not some trace of thermite have been left behind? A chemical by product that would have said Thermite was used.
I know fire investigators can find traces of any liguid fuel that was used. Surely thermite would leave a signature.

Thermite is a mixture of aluminium powder and iron oxide.
There are already lot of those metals in a building.
Especially lots of aluminium where the plane chrashed.

Steve, Even if they did use foot thick paint would not some trace of thermite have been left behind? A chemical by product that would have said Thermite was used.
I know fire investigators can find traces of any liguid fuel that was used. Surely thermite would leave a signature.

Thermite is a mixture of aluminium powder and iron oxide.
There are already lot of those metals in a building.
Especially lots of aluminium where the plane chrashed.

Can't you still tell the difference between beams that have been cut in half by thermite and beams that have simply snapped under the stress caused by the fires and falling debris?

Steve, Even if they did use foot thick paint would not some trace of thermite have been left behind? A chemical by product that would have said Thermite was used.
I know fire investigators can find traces of any liguid fuel that was used. Surely thermite would leave a signature.

Thermite is a mixture of aluminium powder and iron oxide.
There are already lot of those metals in a building.
Especially lots of aluminium where the plane chrashed.

Can't you still tell the difference between beams that have been cut in half by thermite and beams that have simply snapped under the stress caused by the fires and falling debris?

Not I:)
http://www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm
http://www.debunking911.com/moltensteel.htm

Steve, Even if they did use foot thick paint would not some trace of thermite have been left behind? A chemical by product that would have said Thermite was used.
I know fire investigators can find traces of any liguid fuel that was used. Surely thermite would leave a signature.

Thermite is a mixture of aluminium powder and iron oxide.
There are already lot of those metals in a building.
Especially lots of aluminium where the plane chrashed.

Can't you still tell the difference between beams that have been cut in half by thermite and beams that have simply snapped under the stress caused by the fires and falling debris?

Im asking about left over chemical traces. Not physical eveidence.

---

[/quote]

Old James

Steve, Even if they did use foot thick paint would not some trace of thermite have been left behind? A chemical by product that would have said Thermite was used.
I know fire investigators can find traces of any liguid fuel that was used. Surely thermite would leave a signature.

Thermite is a mixture of aluminium powder and iron oxide.
There are already lot of those metals in a building.
Especially lots of aluminium where the plane chrashed.

Can't you still tell the difference between beams that have been cut in half by thermite and beams that have simply snapped under the stress caused by the fires and falling debris?

Im asking about left over chemical traces. Not physical eveidence.

Chemical traces are physical evidences.

Steve, Even if they did use foot thick paint would not some trace of thermite have been left behind? A chemical by product that would have said Thermite was used.
I know fire investigators can find traces of any liguid fuel that was used. Surely thermite would leave a signature.

Thermite is a mixture of aluminium powder and iron oxide.
There are already lot of those metals in a building.
Especially lots of aluminium where the plane chrashed.

Can't you still tell the difference between beams that have been cut in half by thermite and beams that have simply snapped under the stress caused by the fires and falling debris?

Im asking about left over chemical traces. Not physical eveidence.

Chemical traces are physical evidences.

And here I was starting to doubt myself. I was worried chemical traces might be supernatural!

Steve, Even if they did use foot thick paint would not some trace of thermite have been left behind? A chemical by product that would have said Thermite was used.
I know fire investigators can find traces of any liguid fuel that was used. Surely thermite would leave a signature.

Thermite is a mixture of aluminium powder and iron oxide.
There are already lot of those metals in a building.
Especially lots of aluminium where the plane chrashed.

Can't you still tell the difference between beams that have been cut in half by thermite and beams that have simply snapped under the stress caused by the fires and falling debris?

Im asking about left over chemical traces. Not physical eveidence.

Chemical traces are physical evidences.

And here I was starting to doubt myself. I was worried chemical traces might be supernatural!

Ok have your fun at my expense. What I should have stated and you both well know it Was.
Your eyes can tell the differance in steel that has been cut, burned or sheared. But your nose might not be able to detect what explosive, acid, And or whatever was used. But a chemical test should.

---

[/quote]

Old James

Steve, Even if they did use foot thick paint would not some trace of thermite have been left behind? A chemical by product that would have said Thermite was used.
I know fire investigators can find traces of any liguid fuel that was used. Surely thermite would leave a signature.

Thermite is a mixture of aluminium powder and iron oxide.
There are already lot of those metals in a building.
Especially lots of aluminium where the plane chrashed.

Can't you still tell the difference between beams that have been cut in half by thermite and beams that have simply snapped under the stress caused by the fires and falling debris?

Im asking about left over chemical traces. Not physical eveidence.

Chemical traces are physical evidences.

And here I was starting to doubt myself. I was worried chemical traces might be supernatural!

Ok have your fun at my expense. What I should have stated and you both well know it Was.
Your eyes can tell the differance in steel that has been cut, burned or sheared. But your nose might not be able to detect what explosive, acid, And or whatever was used. But a chemical test should.

I was indeed being silly, but I figured you'd handle it ok.

Your eyes can tell the differance in steel that has been cut, burned or sheared.

Yes you can

If Thermite was used there would be slag residue and a lot of it , pieces would be still attached to the beams

C4 different story

---