To Hyperthread or not to Hyperthread

Message boards : Number crunching : To Hyperthread or not to Hyperthread
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Profile Zalster Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 May 99
Posts: 5517
Credit: 528,817,460
RAC: 242
United States
Message 1689370 - Posted: 9 Jun 2015, 3:42:21 UTC - in response to Message 1689367.  
Last modified: 9 Jun 2015, 3:45:54 UTC

hmm..

Now see, that's what I wanted to hear. What advantage is there with the CPU HT on verus not using. 33% is impressive.

Might need to look at that then

Zalster
ID: 1689370 · Report as offensive
Profile JBird Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Sep 02
Posts: 297
Credit: 325,260,309
RAC: 549
United States
Message 1689384 - Posted: 9 Jun 2015, 4:31:05 UTC - in response to Message 1689370.  
Last modified: 9 Jun 2015, 4:37:19 UTC

Z - Do search at AnandTech re: Intel i7 5690x_OC, for similar range in *power *savings while increasing clock speed.
He lists about 5 Clock speeds, voltage and other parameters in a chart with summation re: Sweet spot(s.

Using his chart for my own project

PS- don't forget the "advantage" of turning on Unified Memory in all your Maxwells - there's another throughput increase

ID: 1689384 · Report as offensive
Profile Zalster Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 May 99
Posts: 5517
Credit: 528,817,460
RAC: 242
United States
Message 1689386 - Posted: 9 Jun 2015, 4:42:02 UTC - in response to Message 1689384.  

Well my computer made the decision for me.

It doesn't want to be hyperthreaded. LOL

I've had problems with this MoBo ever since I got it.

Once it turns off, it's a bear to get it to reboot.

I just spent the last 40 minutes trying to get into the BIOS to change turn the HT back on.

Never got there.

Finally got it to reboot and go to start up screen.

Think it's trying to tell me something.

So I'm done messing with it. It's back up and running and I'm not going to be attempting that again for sometime


Zalster
ID: 1689386 · Report as offensive
Profile JBird Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Sep 02
Posts: 297
Credit: 325,260,309
RAC: 549
United States
Message 1689431 - Posted: 9 Jun 2015, 9:17:30 UTC - in response to Message 1689386.  

Ratz!
Do contact ASUS - pretty responsive Tech support
Highly rated Board

ID: 1689431 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20286
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 1689536 - Posted: 9 Jun 2015, 22:55:57 UTC - in response to Message 1689369.  

... My i7-860 showed 11.1% increase in power consumption & 27.7% increase in work output when running HT on & 8 tasks.

Thanks for the good real world example. That looks to be about right for something consistent like s@h tasks.

Note that each task will individually take about twice as long to run but with twice the number of simultaneous tasks and with opportunistic utilization of CPU cycles, you see better utilization to give a higher throughput overall.

The increase in power usage is a good indicator of higher utilization (more work being done). (Or... If you see a slowdown,the higher power suggests that the tasks are too big for the CPU cache and all that extra power is being used to thrash the cache and system RAM.)

In computing it is all a balance of where in the design is the slowest bottleneck... Or not ;-)


Happy fast crunchin',
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 1689536 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Number crunching : To Hyperthread or not to Hyperthread


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.