Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs Symbols Of Flying Objects

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs Symbols Of Flying Objects
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
563896348592

Send message
Joined: 25 Apr 15
Posts: 5
Credit: 33,550
RAC: 0
Message 1680354 - Posted: 16 May 2015, 3:38:34 UTC

The lines above the ellipse may represent the flight paths of the objects. If the writing is an interpretation from an unexplained encounter and not a poem or dream.



Source is wikipedia.org from Book Of The Dead at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_the_Dead
ID: 1680354 · Report as offensive
guest-researcher

Send message
Joined: 9 May 14
Posts: 31
Credit: 652,751
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1680835 - Posted: 17 May 2015, 21:53:41 UTC - in response to Message 1680354.  

Did the Ancient Egyptians who designated this script brought their deceased out to the fields where they witnessed flying orbs or saucer shaped aerial objects?

Perhaps they believed this was the source of eternal life? Or did they witness a revived person from the encounter?

Perhaps the orbs revived the deceased. Our bodies respond to electricity and magnetic fields. Although unrelated this reminds me of the light bulb absorbing energy from Earth in the ground by Nikola Tesla and Schumann Resonance.
ID: 1680835 · Report as offensive
guest-researcher

Send message
Joined: 9 May 14
Posts: 31
Credit: 652,751
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1680841 - Posted: 17 May 2015, 22:06:46 UTC - in response to Message 1680835.  

Theory of orbs able to manipulate space-time. Reversing time can rejuvenate the deceased. If a 'magnetic field' surrounded only the deceased and time were to be reversed, then it may be possible to 'reset' all biological functions like the Star Trek transporter room on board the USS Enterprise.
ID: 1680841 · Report as offensive
Profile janneseti
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Oct 09
Posts: 14106
Credit: 655,366
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 1680853 - Posted: 17 May 2015, 23:07:18 UTC
Last modified: 17 May 2015, 23:11:42 UTC

What?
Ancient aliens?
Wrong forum:) It's not SETI or Science just rubbish...
ID: 1680853 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1680885 - Posted: 18 May 2015, 1:45:48 UTC

My advice is to get back to rational thought and speculation or else this whole effort will be classified as an errand of a bunch of fools and buffoons
ID: 1680885 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15691
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 1680887 - Posted: 18 May 2015, 1:49:37 UTC

I agree with Janneseti. The problem with trying to interpret the Egyptian hieroglyphs is that we are using what we know of the world today with what may not have been the world then. Any object can look like whatever you want it to look like - that's why they have Rorschach tests.

Without knowing what it was they were trying to paint or draw, what you are doing now is trying to match your pre-drawn conclusion (that we have been visited by aliens in the past) with the available data. That's terribly unscientific.

Any number of more plausible explanations come to mind that better explain the drawings, several that don't require mental gymnastics to keep re-interpreting the available data like the Ancient Aliens hypothesis.
ID: 1680887 · Report as offensive
guest-researcher

Send message
Joined: 9 May 14
Posts: 31
Credit: 652,751
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1680898 - Posted: 18 May 2015, 2:17:35 UTC - in response to Message 1680887.  
Last modified: 18 May 2015, 2:18:01 UTC

I agree, yet to explore advance technology from the perspective of nanotechnology and material science the possibility is intriguing yet frustrating to develop with our current knowledge and way of life.
ID: 1680898 · Report as offensive
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 3387
Credit: 4,182,900
RAC: 10
United States
Message 1680933 - Posted: 18 May 2015, 5:57:44 UTC - in response to Message 1680885.  

My advice is to get back to rational thought and speculation or else this whole effort will be classified as an errand of a bunch of fools and buffoons

+10 I think this forum wanders way too far into the realm of the ancient aliens crowd as it is without threads like this one.
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.
ID: 1680933 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15691
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 1680999 - Posted: 18 May 2015, 11:43:57 UTC - in response to Message 1680898.  

I agree, yet to explore advance technology from the perspective of nanotechnology and material science the possibility is intriguing yet frustrating to develop with our current knowledge and way of life.


I've read and re-read your response several times and I'm not exactly sure what it is you agreed with or what you are trying to say afterward.
ID: 1680999 · Report as offensive
Profile Jord
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 15184
Credit: 4,362,181
RAC: 3
Netherlands
Message 1681051 - Posted: 18 May 2015, 13:56:04 UTC - in response to Message 1680887.  
Last modified: 18 May 2015, 13:57:18 UTC

...the Ancient Aliens hypothesis.

Are we alone in our beliefs of extraterrestrial life? And if so, how can we explain that in simple terms?
Ancient Alien theorists say yes, and ask you to look at an ancient ruin on the other side of the world, where ancient alien scientists have recently discovered strange triangles, this while the building is over 3,000 years old. How could ancient man have knowledge of triangles, if these didn't exist before Pythagoras had his theorem about them? Ancient Alien theorist convey that this means man must have had contact from beyond the stars.

I always fall off the couch laughing at the debunk methods of the ancient alien theorists. 5,000 year old circle? Must be aliens, because pi wasn't invented at that time, so how could ancient man then have drawn a perfect circle in the sand?

The screen saver on my TV server consists of 27 images of Giorgio with different hairstyles (but all as if he's been in a tornado 2 minutes before filming), ties, brooches and off late holding a mask. I hope AA goes on a long time, just for screen grabs of Giorgio. :)
ID: 1681051 · Report as offensive
Profile William Rothamel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 3756
Credit: 1,999,735
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1681059 - Posted: 18 May 2015, 14:32:43 UTC - in response to Message 1681051.  
Last modified: 18 May 2015, 14:32:59 UTC

how could ancient man then have drawn a perfect circle in the sand?


Tie a rope to a pole or stake and walk around as many times as you want.

Babylonians, Etruscans, Greeks, Romans and probably those in the middle east and China were all excellent mathematicians
ID: 1681059 · Report as offensive
KLiK
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 14
Posts: 1304
Credit: 22,994,597
RAC: 60
Croatia
Message 1681363 - Posted: 19 May 2015, 6:08:21 UTC

ID: 1681363 · Report as offensive
guest-researcher

Send message
Joined: 9 May 14
Posts: 31
Credit: 652,751
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1681623 - Posted: 20 May 2015, 2:20:18 UTC - in response to Message 1680999.  

Our progress in developing 'flying saucer' technology should have already been developed. We are simply not a scientific civilization. Our progress is too slow.
ID: 1681623 · Report as offensive
guest-researcher

Send message
Joined: 9 May 14
Posts: 31
Credit: 652,751
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1681625 - Posted: 20 May 2015, 2:35:41 UTC - in response to Message 1681363.  
Last modified: 20 May 2015, 2:39:17 UTC



Ancient Egyptians think like us. Drawing similar shapes.
ID: 1681625 · Report as offensive
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 3387
Credit: 4,182,900
RAC: 10
United States
Message 1681629 - Posted: 20 May 2015, 3:11:37 UTC

Actually many rocket experts think the Star Trek Enterprise design is bad engineering and would tear itself apart the first time it tried to go to warp.
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.
ID: 1681629 · Report as offensive
Profile Gordon Lowe
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Nov 00
Posts: 12094
Credit: 6,317,865
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1681630 - Posted: 20 May 2015, 3:17:30 UTC - in response to Message 1681629.  
Last modified: 20 May 2015, 3:18:35 UTC

Actually many rocket experts think the Star Trek Enterprise design is bad engineering and would tear itself apart the first time it tried to go to warp.


You're probably right, but tell this guy that - http://www.buildtheenterprise.org/
The mind is a weird and mysterious place
ID: 1681630 · Report as offensive
Darth Beaver Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 99
Posts: 6728
Credit: 21,443,075
RAC: 3
Australia
Message 1681644 - Posted: 20 May 2015, 4:35:52 UTC - in response to Message 1681630.  

You're probably right, but tell this guy that - http://www.buildtheenterprise.org/


Wow someone is crazy enough to try and build the enterprise , cool !
ID: 1681644 · Report as offensive
KLiK
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 14
Posts: 1304
Credit: 22,994,597
RAC: 60
Croatia
Message 1681661 - Posted: 20 May 2015, 5:58:27 UTC - in response to Message 1681629.  

Actually many rocket experts think the Star Trek Enterprise design is bad engineering and would tear itself apart the first time it tried to go to warp.

well, no it wouldn't!

'cause there is no INERTIA in going to WARP...inside a Acumbere bubble the ship is massless! ;)


non-profit org. Play4Life in Zagreb, Croatia, EU
ID: 1681661 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15691
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 1681719 - Posted: 20 May 2015, 9:49:12 UTC - in response to Message 1681623.  
Last modified: 20 May 2015, 10:03:09 UTC

Our progress in developing 'flying saucer' technology should have already been developed. We are simply not a scientific civilization. Our progress is too slow.


Not quite sure what this has to do with your topic. This is also a non-sequitur. That we haven't developed a 'flying saucer' (or why we need to in the first place) does not indicate we are not a scientific civilization.

And I'm not quite sure why you feel we should be farther along in our progress. By what arbitrary measure are you comparing us against? Have other civilizations been able to do it in a shorter amount of time?

I'm also wondering what our progress as a civilization in developing a flying saucer has to do with these Egyptian hieroglyphs. And I'm still looking for a good reason to conclude these drawing were of flying saucers and not any number of more plausible explanations.
ID: 1681719 · Report as offensive
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 3387
Credit: 4,182,900
RAC: 10
United States
Message 1681733 - Posted: 20 May 2015, 11:44:14 UTC - in response to Message 1681661.  

Actually many rocket experts think the Star Trek Enterprise design is bad engineering and would tear itself apart the first time it tried to go to warp.

well, no it wouldn't!

'cause there is no INERTIA in going to WARP...inside a Acumbere bubble the ship is massless! ;)

Yeah but the Enterprise didn't go to warp from a standing start. At least that is not how it was presented. I watched every one of Star Treks original airings back in the 1960's. It was the first TV show my parents allowed me and my brothers to stay up after 9:00 PM to watch. So to be more correct I should have stated, the first time it fired up it's impulse engines to travel at sublight speeds
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.
ID: 1681733 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs Symbols Of Flying Objects


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.