Message boards :
SETI@home Science :
Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs Symbols Of Flying Objects
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
563896348592 Send message Joined: 25 Apr 15 Posts: 5 Credit: 33,550 RAC: 0 |
The lines above the ellipse may represent the flight paths of the objects. If the writing is an interpretation from an unexplained encounter and not a poem or dream. Source is wikipedia.org from Book Of The Dead at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_the_Dead |
guest-researcher Send message Joined: 9 May 14 Posts: 31 Credit: 652,751 RAC: 0 |
Did the Ancient Egyptians who designated this script brought their deceased out to the fields where they witnessed flying orbs or saucer shaped aerial objects? Perhaps they believed this was the source of eternal life? Or did they witness a revived person from the encounter? Perhaps the orbs revived the deceased. Our bodies respond to electricity and magnetic fields. Although unrelated this reminds me of the light bulb absorbing energy from Earth in the ground by Nikola Tesla and Schumann Resonance. |
guest-researcher Send message Joined: 9 May 14 Posts: 31 Credit: 652,751 RAC: 0 |
Theory of orbs able to manipulate space-time. Reversing time can rejuvenate the deceased. If a 'magnetic field' surrounded only the deceased and time were to be reversed, then it may be possible to 'reset' all biological functions like the Star Trek transporter room on board the USS Enterprise. |
janneseti Send message Joined: 14 Oct 09 Posts: 14106 Credit: 655,366 RAC: 0 |
What? Ancient aliens? Wrong forum:) It's not SETI or Science just rubbish... |
William Rothamel Send message Joined: 25 Oct 06 Posts: 3756 Credit: 1,999,735 RAC: 4 |
My advice is to get back to rational thought and speculation or else this whole effort will be classified as an errand of a bunch of fools and buffoons |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
I agree with Janneseti. The problem with trying to interpret the Egyptian hieroglyphs is that we are using what we know of the world today with what may not have been the world then. Any object can look like whatever you want it to look like - that's why they have Rorschach tests. Without knowing what it was they were trying to paint or draw, what you are doing now is trying to match your pre-drawn conclusion (that we have been visited by aliens in the past) with the available data. That's terribly unscientific. Any number of more plausible explanations come to mind that better explain the drawings, several that don't require mental gymnastics to keep re-interpreting the available data like the Ancient Aliens hypothesis. |
guest-researcher Send message Joined: 9 May 14 Posts: 31 Credit: 652,751 RAC: 0 |
I agree, yet to explore advance technology from the perspective of nanotechnology and material science the possibility is intriguing yet frustrating to develop with our current knowledge and way of life. |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
My advice is to get back to rational thought and speculation or else this whole effort will be classified as an errand of a bunch of fools and buffoons +10 I think this forum wanders way too far into the realm of the ancient aliens crowd as it is without threads like this one. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
I agree, yet to explore advance technology from the perspective of nanotechnology and material science the possibility is intriguing yet frustrating to develop with our current knowledge and way of life. I've read and re-read your response several times and I'm not exactly sure what it is you agreed with or what you are trying to say afterward. |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
...the Ancient Aliens hypothesis. Are we alone in our beliefs of extraterrestrial life? And if so, how can we explain that in simple terms? Ancient Alien theorists say yes, and ask you to look at an ancient ruin on the other side of the world, where ancient alien scientists have recently discovered strange triangles, this while the building is over 3,000 years old. How could ancient man have knowledge of triangles, if these didn't exist before Pythagoras had his theorem about them? Ancient Alien theorist convey that this means man must have had contact from beyond the stars. I always fall off the couch laughing at the debunk methods of the ancient alien theorists. 5,000 year old circle? Must be aliens, because pi wasn't invented at that time, so how could ancient man then have drawn a perfect circle in the sand? The screen saver on my TV server consists of 27 images of Giorgio with different hairstyles (but all as if he's been in a tornado 2 minutes before filming), ties, brooches and off late holding a mask. I hope AA goes on a long time, just for screen grabs of Giorgio. :) |
William Rothamel Send message Joined: 25 Oct 06 Posts: 3756 Credit: 1,999,735 RAC: 4 |
how could ancient man then have drawn a perfect circle in the sand? Tie a rope to a pole or stake and walk around as many times as you want. Babylonians, Etruscans, Greeks, Romans and probably those in the middle east and China were all excellent mathematicians |
KLiK Send message Joined: 31 Mar 14 Posts: 1304 Credit: 22,994,597 RAC: 60 |
Talking about Prime directive, are we? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKE5L2FG63I ;) non-profit org. Play4Life in Zagreb, Croatia, EU |
guest-researcher Send message Joined: 9 May 14 Posts: 31 Credit: 652,751 RAC: 0 |
Our progress in developing 'flying saucer' technology should have already been developed. We are simply not a scientific civilization. Our progress is too slow. |
guest-researcher Send message Joined: 9 May 14 Posts: 31 Credit: 652,751 RAC: 0 |
Ancient Egyptians think like us. Drawing similar shapes. |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
Actually many rocket experts think the Star Trek Enterprise design is bad engineering and would tear itself apart the first time it tried to go to warp. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
Gordon Lowe Send message Joined: 5 Nov 00 Posts: 12094 Credit: 6,317,865 RAC: 0 |
Actually many rocket experts think the Star Trek Enterprise design is bad engineering and would tear itself apart the first time it tried to go to warp. You're probably right, but tell this guy that - http://www.buildtheenterprise.org/ The mind is a weird and mysterious place |
Darth Beaver Send message Joined: 20 Aug 99 Posts: 6728 Credit: 21,443,075 RAC: 3 |
You're probably right, but tell this guy that - http://www.buildtheenterprise.org/ Wow someone is crazy enough to try and build the enterprise , cool ! |
KLiK Send message Joined: 31 Mar 14 Posts: 1304 Credit: 22,994,597 RAC: 60 |
Actually many rocket experts think the Star Trek Enterprise design is bad engineering and would tear itself apart the first time it tried to go to warp. well, no it wouldn't! 'cause there is no INERTIA in going to WARP...inside a Acumbere bubble the ship is massless! ;) non-profit org. Play4Life in Zagreb, Croatia, EU |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
Our progress in developing 'flying saucer' technology should have already been developed. We are simply not a scientific civilization. Our progress is too slow. Not quite sure what this has to do with your topic. This is also a non-sequitur. That we haven't developed a 'flying saucer' (or why we need to in the first place) does not indicate we are not a scientific civilization. And I'm not quite sure why you feel we should be farther along in our progress. By what arbitrary measure are you comparing us against? Have other civilizations been able to do it in a shorter amount of time? I'm also wondering what our progress as a civilization in developing a flying saucer has to do with these Egyptian hieroglyphs. And I'm still looking for a good reason to conclude these drawing were of flying saucers and not any number of more plausible explanations. |
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
Actually many rocket experts think the Star Trek Enterprise design is bad engineering and would tear itself apart the first time it tried to go to warp. Yeah but the Enterprise didn't go to warp from a standing start. At least that is not how it was presented. I watched every one of Star Treks original airings back in the 1960's. It was the first TV show my parents allowed me and my brothers to stay up after 9:00 PM to watch. So to be more correct I should have stated, the first time it fired up it's impulse engines to travel at sublight speeds Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.