Shelley Wright: Is ET using infrared lasers to communicate?

Message boards : News : Shelley Wright: Is ET using infrared lasers to communicate?

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Steve Croft
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Oct 99
Posts: 42
Credit: 2,935,805
RAC: 5,994
United States
Message 1678268 - Posted: 11 May 2015, 17:16:48 UTC
Last modified: 11 May 2015, 17:17:25 UTC

Shelley Wright, a former postdoctoral scientist in the UC Berkeley Astronomy Department, and now faculty at the Dunlap Institute for Astronomy & Astrophysics at the University of Toronto, visited Berkeley SETI Research Center recently to talk about infrared and optical SETI, and how ET might be using huge lasers to communicate. Watch our four minute video interview at https://youtu.be/JoOkXhNUQO4
ID: 1678268 · Report as offensive
OzzFan
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15126
Credit: 45,596,226
RAC: 46,701
United States
Message 1678348 - Posted: 11 May 2015, 19:15:57 UTC - in response to Message 1678268.  

Loving the videos and engagement with the community, sir. Please keep it up! I'll have to watch the video when I get home from work later today.
ID: 1678348 · Report as offensive
Tom95134

Send message
Joined: 27 Nov 01
Posts: 216
Credit: 3,790,200
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1678949 - Posted: 13 May 2015, 3:26:14 UTC

Lasers would be too slow since the transmission speed would still be limited by the speed of light. Also, the beam would be subject to attenuation should it pass through planetary atmospheres and warping as it passed near large bodies with high orders of gravity.

It's more likely that they have figured out how to use gravity waves as a carrier and are imposing some form of modulation we have yet to detect.

Just my opinion.
ID: 1678949 · Report as offensive
Profile Cactus Bob
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 May 99
Posts: 166
Credit: 6,527,965
RAC: 1,988
United States
Message 1679247 - Posted: 13 May 2015, 15:57:19 UTC - in response to Message 1678949.  

Lasers would be too slow since the transmission speed would still be limited by the speed of light. Also, the beam would be subject to attenuation should it pass through planetary atmospheres and warping as it passed near large bodies with high orders of gravity.

It's more likely that they have figured out how to use gravity waves as a carrier and are imposing some form of modulation we have yet to detect.

Just my opinion.


Unless I am mistaken. it appears gravity travels at the speed of light. Entanglement seems to be the best solution for Faster Than Light Speed although that is not supposed to carry any information.

It appears we are cavemen (and Caveladies) trying to figure out how a radio works. Without the effort we will never unravel the mystery.

Bob
---------------
Sig File to be inserted here
Sometimes you are the windshield, sometimes the bug.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SETI@home classic workunits 4,321
SETI@home classic CPU time 22,169 hours
ID: 1679247 · Report as offensive
Joseph03051971

Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 03
Posts: 43
Credit: 719,859
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1679367 - Posted: 13 May 2015, 21:06:55 UTC - in response to Message 1678949.  

Work was being done gravity wave detection.
ID: 1679367 · Report as offensive
Profile tullioProject Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 5719
Credit: 975,333
RAC: 2,482
Italy
Message 1679514 - Posted: 14 May 2015, 7:51:31 UTC

You can still hunt for gravitational (not gravity) waves at Einstein@home and Albert@home.
Tullio
ID: 1679514 · Report as offensive
Profile zubr2009Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Mar 13
Posts: 24
Credit: 143,756
RAC: 230
Belarus
Message 1679598 - Posted: 14 May 2015, 16:43:20 UTC

Hello.
We must ask Captain James T. Kirk from "Enterprise" as they talked at great distances in space and all the business then. :))
Горы, нет ничего лучше гор. :)
Mountains, there is nothing better than mountains. :)
Life is good when you live without haste! ))
ID: 1679598 · Report as offensive
Tom95134

Send message
Joined: 27 Nov 01
Posts: 216
Credit: 3,790,200
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1681193 - Posted: 18 May 2015, 20:09:52 UTC - in response to Message 1679247.  
Last modified: 18 May 2015, 20:11:30 UTC

Lasers would be too slow since the transmission speed would still be limited by the speed of light. Also, the beam would be subject to attenuation should it pass through planetary atmospheres and warping as it passed near large bodies with high orders of gravity.

It's more likely that they have figured out how to use gravity waves as a carrier and are imposing some form of modulation we have yet to detect.

Just my opinion.


Unless I am mistaken. it appears gravity travels at the speed of light. Entanglement seems to be the best solution for Faster Than Light Speed although that is not supposed to carry any information.

It appears we are cavemen (and Caveladies) trying to figure out how a radio works. Without the effort we will never unravel the mystery.

Bob
---------------
Sig File to be inserted here

As far as I know, there is very little information about the way and speed in which gravitational waves are propagated. This would be especially true if what we perceive as gravity is a "leakage" into our reality from a parallel universe.
ID: 1681193 · Report as offensive
Profile TREEDAWG

Send message
Joined: 3 Jun 13
Posts: 2
Credit: 33,848
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1683633 - Posted: 24 May 2015, 8:52:21 UTC

Lasers would be too slow since the transmission speed would still be limited by the speed of light. Also, the beam would be subject to attenuation should it pass through planetary atmospheres and warping as it passed near large bodies with high orders of gravity.

It's more likely that they have figured out how to use gravity waves as a carrier and are imposing some form of modulation we have yet to detect.

Just my opinion.

We haven't found anything that can travel faster than the speed of light yet, so why wouldn't lasers or radio waves still be the best means of communication?
ID: 1683633 · Report as offensive
A Harliquin

Send message
Joined: 28 Mar 10
Posts: 3
Credit: 10,944,546
RAC: 433
United States
Message 1684144 - Posted: 25 May 2015, 20:11:33 UTC - in response to Message 1678268.  

Yeh, Right - let's see now,

An intelligent species has a high probability of needing an atmosphere - I've never seen any model outside of SpeFic fantasy (for instance S&J Robinson's Stardance trilogy - nice, but, as I said, fiction).

While a species as intelligent as ours may be exploring its local solar system, it has too many Senators from Wisconsin - like the guy who took the seat formerly held by Joseph McCarthy. Bill Proxmire, cut the budget for NASA's proposed 100% reusable return as glider lift liquid hydrogen/oxygen lift vehicle carrying a similarly-fueled reusable "space shuttle" returning the same way in half, ordering NASA to build the STS on half its proposed bare-bones budget.

(Proxmire, told this former newspaperman that he loved the fact everybody concerned with scientific research used his name as a verb of maladiction, went to his grave, damned cheerful that his way was paved by the ashes of astronauts)

They may have out-of-atmosphere telescopes lasting a little longer than their lunar exploration phase, but, all-in-all, they're a damned stupid bunch.

And any atmosphere will scatter optical communications worse than "empty space" phenomena like the still-unclassified "dark matter". So, unless your society can harness the power of a star, and point it in the right direction, the ABSOLUTE right direction, fuggetaboutit.

If you can harness the power of a star to look for intelligent life, you would be better off developing a method of modulating its amplitude, sending out a signal to any species with optical (or in this case almost any EMF) receptors for sensing its environment, and therefore "looking" at stars. FM would carry further, but it could lead to the creation of a "pulsing expansion-contraction universe" theory based on the rapid appearance of what could be a radical Doppler shift.

A directional laser has to be aimed at the spefcific place the target will be able to see it in n lightyears, and we're talking planet for a highly columnated polarized beam, which could be highly destructive for anybody who happens to break it far closer to its source than itss intended target.

This is what post-doc researchers are turning out these days?

That's just problem #1.
ID: 1684144 · Report as offensive
AlPaquot

Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 15
Posts: 1
Credit: 17,494
RAC: 13
Belgium
Message 1689668 - Posted: 10 Jun 2015, 6:22:00 UTC - in response to Message 1678949.  

Lasers would be too slow since the transmission speed would still be limited by the speed of light. Also, the beam would be subject to attenuation should it pass through planetary atmospheres and warping as it passed near large bodies with high orders of gravity.

It's more likely that they have figured out how to use gravity waves as a carrier and are imposing some form of modulation we have yet to detect.

Just my opinion.



What makes you think gravity travels any faster than the speed of light?
Not an expert in physics, but it sure sounds like an heresy.
I'm pretty sure I've read about this, though. Wasn't the discovery of the concept of gravitational wave and the idea that they do not travel at infinite speed one of the big achievements of Albert Einstein?
ID: 1689668 · Report as offensive

Message boards : News : Shelley Wright: Is ET using infrared lasers to communicate?


 
©2016 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.