Aren't Christian women still asked to cover their heads when they go onto Church?

I don't Think that practice is done anymore.
But I remember my grandma used to where a hat anyway in the church in the 60's.
And of course. Shut up!
But 100 years ago...

You, and Gary, are at least consistent. Which in some ways positive, and in others, negative.

Perhaps we see the Emperor's clothes.

---

You, and Gary, are at least consistent. Which in some ways positive, and in others, negative.

Perhaps we see the Emperor's clothes.

... or lack thereof.

You, and Gary, are at least consistent. Which in some ways positive, and in others, negative.

Perhaps we see the Emperor's clothes.

See, this is where I don't even get what Clyde is trying to say.
Is he saying, "among the qualities Gary and Sarge have, they are consistent in the way they speak"?
Or is he saying, "among the S@H posters, we can say there are at least two posters that are consistent"?
This is such interesting use of the American language, if confusing.

You, and Gary, are at least consistent. Which in some ways positive, and in others, negative.

Perhaps we see the Emperor's clothes.

See, this is where I don't even get what Clyde is trying to say.
Is he saying, "among the qualities Gary and Sarge have, they are consistent in the way they speak"?
Or is he saying, "among the S@H posters, we can say there are at least two posters that are consistent"?
This is such interesting use of the American language, if confusing.

+1

I have given up with, Clyde. He doesn't write clearly and he doesn't really understand what other people write. Those with a generous nature could interpret it as a deliberate debating technique to create confusion so he can declare himself a winner (which is what does seem to be what happens).

---

Reality Internet Personality

If you disagree, on who is winning:

So what. I don't care.

I know who is really winning, by your, and others, silly, not to the point, responses.

Not understand any thinking, outside of a Monastic Type Intellectual Environment: Is to be expected, from those with a Theological/Ideological Belief.

Just as many would get bored, and worse, attempting to have an Intellectual Discussion with a Religious Believer:

I find the same with Ideological Believers.

Neither you, or others sharing your Beliefs, will ever truly understand.

Just Human Nature.

I'm sorry Clyde, I've raised too many teenagers and taught too many teenagers to not see your posting style for exactly what it is.

---

Reality Internet Personality

Dr. HOHUM has Raised too many, Oh so many Pebbles, and Taught countless of Geological Rubble, only to 'see' them' Waste Away into The Sea. Their Streams of Consciousness, another Layer Added to Sea Floor, never to be 'heard' from again, for Eons.

Now if Youse Wants 'Style', Sit Back and Get Your Gravel 'On', as HOHUM beat beat beat beats 'it' 'Out'.

Yep.

---

May we All have a METAMORPHOSIS. REASON. GOoD JUDGEMENT and LOVE and ORDER!!!!!

Your free association comes at a cost. Mine does not. Stream of consciousness from me, Your stream? River sentiment, dredged up, only to have the pebbles left in da delta.
Bow ye, to your stone idol, jailed "Dr." Kent Ho-hum-vind. Speciation. Glaciation.
Oh, that mud you flung, was not by you, but by 'The' Flood?

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

I have given up with, Clyde. He doesn't write clearly and he doesn't really understand what other people write. Those with a generous nature could interpret it as a deliberate debating technique to create confusion so he can declare himself a winner (which is what does seem to be what happens).

Es we have seen this before, maybe he learned it from the departed ID.

---

If you disagree, on who is winning:

So what. I don't care.

I know who is really winning, by your, and others, silly, not to the point, responses.

Not understand any thinking, outside of a Monastic Type Intellectual Environment: Is to be expected, from those with a Theological/Ideological Belief.

Just as many would get bored, and worse, attempting to have an Intellectual Discussion with a Religious Believer:

I find the same with Ideological Believers.

Neither you, or others sharing your Beliefs, will ever truly understand.

Just Human Nature.

I'm sorry Clyde, I've raised too many teenagers and taught too many teenagers to not see your posting style for exactly what it is.

Monastic? LOL! He'a totally missed all the hints. Sees only what he wishes to, 'Tis a wonder more than 4 people have left his posts visible.
Besides, the point was, why does Dull believe no one goes after Obama (when, of course, it was already demonstrated even libs do, but we wanted to hear his supposed reasons for believing this).

When you learn at age 3 what it is for life to kick you in the derriere, it's hard to lead a monastic existence. When one seeks out conversation and friendship (in person and online) with several outside the supposed "cloister" of one's department (or even several of opposing points of view within one's cloister), it is hard to lead a monastic existence. When one routinely encounters people who would like to kick one's derriere for having long hair, a different sense of humor or one's occupation, it is hard to lead a monastic existence. At best, one can catch a few moments of peace by switching from listening to hard rock and metal over to the space ambient stuff for a while and, here on the S@H fora, putting someone who he believes he knows what existences others lead on ignore. Granted, that moment of peace can be tainted when, by coding/design flaw, others that do not have that user on ignore quote that user in their responses. I predict three things:

1) He will eventually disappear.
2) Or, he will be ignored by more and more to become the empty can, rattling most, that no one hears.
3) Or, he will eventually learn to change his tactics/communication style and become someone we enjoy speaking with, even if we do not see eye to eye.

My prediction will deliberately lack what probabilities I think should be assigned to this partition of the sample space.[/list][/list]

I just watched a scary movie. The title is "America, Imagine the World Without her" narrated by Dinesh D'Souza. I have not yet watched "2016 Obama's America" but I will soon.

---

Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.

Poor Poor Poor 3 Job Working Sarge. Railing Against Dull, AGAIN, and AGAIN and AGAIN.

Long Hair Weighs Heavy on A Brainiac Mind. Must be da Thin Skin holding 'it' Down.

Got cha beat, when I was 2, and when I was 5, no matta.

My Long Hair has Long Since Departed and The Hay now Sprouting 'Long' from my sides Gets All The Derision. Sigh Sigh Sigh.

Yes, I Also 'Predict' my Demise and Soon(In Geological Time, of course) will Leave. I am So Unhappy being 'Invisible' to The Visible.

I'm Very Sorry Da Ones who 'Quote' Me, cause Such Irritation. 'It' 'is' A Hard Hard Hard Existence We Endure, trying so Hard Hard Hard to be 'HuWoMan'.

As Far As 'OBlabby' is Concerned, All Who Have a Brain, 'Know', and Need Not to 'Have' 'it' Spelled Out.

'Rock' On Broheims, or Easy Listening. Whatever 'is' Your 'Thang'.

Yep.

---

May we All have a METAMORPHOSIS. REASON. GOoD JUDGEMENT and LOVE and ORDER!!!!!

I'm not sure why anyone on these fora would call for a shunning of SillyMan, DullMan, or others. Why deny them the simple pleasures these fora afford? Different threads may offer a therapeutic experience for some in need.

These people need to turn to fora like this, because if they said the things to family and friends that they say here, they'd be ostracised in real life. Rather sad really, almost like living two separate lives simultaneously.

Perhaps they've already been ostracized which is why they've turned to places like this?

The few people who read these fora do so for entertainment/distraction. It's the disparate views, some thought provoking, others laughable, that makes it interesting.

These Seti fora are open to the whole world to read, not just a few Setizens that might be interested. Are there any figures of the total hits that Seti receives, whether logged in or not? Why can't we have a hit counter?

While the data might be interesting, we already have at least one person that creates threads just to watch the thread views as a gauge of how popular their threads are. I don't think the forums really needs that kind of distraction as people thinking thread views equates directly with popularity - or as a personal soap box to the world. I understand it's going to happen regardless, but we don't need to feed that mentality.

Disagree.

I have never pushed the 'Red X', Ignored, nor attempted to censor others. They do have a Right to their BS.

As shown in the previous posts.

BTW: I have never pushed the 'Red X', nor attempted to Censor, or Ignore others, as they continually do. Betting the same regarding you.

You keep denying something that no-one has accused you of... guilty conscience?

---

Life on earth is the global equivalent of not storing things in the fridge.

Just to clarify for those who imagine there is some sort of red-X campaign being run behind the scenes, there is actually very few red x reports for the whole of seti.

So anyone who accuses others of red Xing posts as a form of censorship is making themselves look rather silly. The same goes for anyone who claims some sort of superiority because they don't press it.

So how about we stop this silly bun fight about who is the most freedomist and get back to the topic of the thread, whatever that actually is.

---

Reality Internet Personality

Of course Es99.

BTW: Freedomest.

Nice word. May I use it in the future?

I think she meant what she said, freedomist, i.e. an advocate or adherent of freedomism.
Freedomism (noun): the doctrine that man has freedom of choice in his actions.

Freedomest is a drub rehab clinic in Giza, Egypt.

---

Life on earth is the global equivalent of not storing things in the fridge.

Freedom, au! (With an umlaut. For the Yiddish, oy!)

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

I was not aware it was actually a word, but obviously it means a supporter of Freedomism and this blog gives the meaning I was most aiming at.

---

Reality Internet Personality

Your honor, I submit to you, San Francisco has 'Nothing' to do with Dull's rant that we fail to criticize Obama. I move to strike. I also file a motion that we be forced to use the red X a minimum of 10 times a day and that I be forced to publicize my block list so that others be forced to block the same people I do. Because, you know, 'It'.