GPU performance of GTX580 and GTX780Ti

Message boards : Number crunching : GPU performance of GTX580 and GTX780Ti
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
yyama@home
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Apr 00
Posts: 9
Credit: 80,896,843
RAC: 61
Japan
Message 1642794 - Posted: 16 Feb 2015, 9:25:07 UTC

I changed GPU from GTX580 SLI to GTX780Ti SLI few month ago.
But Credit/day of BOINCstats.com seems decreased.

I want information about GPU performance of GTX580 and GTX780Ti
as GPGPU of SETI@home.
yyama@home
a member of the Team EDGE

"Murphy's law" is the one and only Truth of the universe.
ID: 1642794 · Report as offensive
Profile BilBg
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 May 07
Posts: 3720
Credit: 9,385,827
RAC: 0
Bulgaria
Message 1642815 - Posted: 16 Feb 2015, 10:07:47 UTC - in response to Message 1642794.  

AstroPulse (which gives better credit/h) is down so anyone's RAC is down
I now have "Recent average credit 3,851" and usually when AstroPulse is working my RAC is ~8500
 


- ALF - "Find out what you don't do well ..... then don't do it!" :)
 
ID: 1642815 · Report as offensive
yyama@home
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Apr 00
Posts: 9
Credit: 80,896,843
RAC: 61
Japan
Message 1644322 - Posted: 20 Feb 2015, 2:36:56 UTC

BilBg, thanks.
But I still doubt performance of GTX780Ti.

I have two computers which run SETI.
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/hosts_user.php?userid=858
ID: 4862228 (Core2Duo E8500, GTX580)'s RAC is about 16,000.
ID: 7328558 (Core i7-4790K, GTX780Ti SLI)'s RAC is about 30,000.

More distinction should be expected from SPEC, I think.
yyama@home
a member of the Team EDGE

"Murphy's law" is the one and only Truth of the universe.
ID: 1644322 · Report as offensive
Profile BilBg
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 May 07
Posts: 3720
Credit: 9,385,827
RAC: 0
Bulgaria
Message 1644471 - Posted: 20 Feb 2015, 13:39:06 UTC - in response to Message 1644322.  
Last modified: 20 Feb 2015, 13:56:36 UTC

Do you use app_config.xml to run 2 tasks per GPU?
<app_config>

   <app>
      <name>setiathome_v7</name>
      <gpu_versions>
         <gpu_usage>0.5</gpu_usage>
         <cpu_usage>0.04</cpu_usage>
      </gpu_versions>
   </app>

   <app>
      <name>astropulse_v7</name>
      <gpu_versions>
         <gpu_usage>0.5</gpu_usage>
         <cpu_usage>0.5</cpu_usage>
      </gpu_versions>
   </app>

</app_config>


P.S.
If you want people which use GPUs like yours to give info on their speed first hand - post in Number Crunching
Or you can click the red-x square under your first post and ask a moderator to move this thread to Number Crunching
 


- ALF - "Find out what you don't do well ..... then don't do it!" :)
 
ID: 1644471 · Report as offensive
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22190
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 1644486 - Posted: 20 Feb 2015, 14:23:18 UTC

I can't comment on the gtx580, but my pair of GTX780 are doing about 45000....
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 1644486 · Report as offensive
Profile petri33
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 02
Posts: 1668
Credit: 623,086,772
RAC: 156
Finland
Message 1644656 - Posted: 20 Feb 2015, 21:23:09 UTC - in response to Message 1644486.  

I can't comment on the gtx580, but my pair of GTX780 are doing about 45000....

My three GTX780 are doing ~ 70000+ (on MB only for now).
To overcome Heisenbergs:
"You can't always get what you want / but if you try sometimes you just might find / you get what you need." -- Rolling Stones
ID: 1644656 · Report as offensive
Profile petri33
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 02
Posts: 1668
Credit: 623,086,772
RAC: 156
Finland
Message 1644657 - Posted: 20 Feb 2015, 21:26:15 UTC - in response to Message 1644471.  
Last modified: 20 Feb 2015, 21:29:55 UTC

Do you use app_config.xml to run 2 tasks per GPU?
... ...


I'd too advise of doing 2 (maybe 3) at a time.
To overcome Heisenbergs:
"You can't always get what you want / but if you try sometimes you just might find / you get what you need." -- Rolling Stones
ID: 1644657 · Report as offensive
yyama@home
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Apr 00
Posts: 9
Credit: 80,896,843
RAC: 61
Japan
Message 1644708 - Posted: 20 Feb 2015, 23:08:57 UTC

Thank you for your advices.
I quickly appended "app_config.xml" to run 2 tasks per GPU.

But why 2 or 3 tasks are recommended for the performance?
BOINC's default setting is 1 task per GPU.
yyama@home
a member of the Team EDGE

"Murphy's law" is the one and only Truth of the universe.
ID: 1644708 · Report as offensive
Profile Brent Norman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 99
Posts: 2786
Credit: 685,657,289
RAC: 835
Canada
Message 1644711 - Posted: 20 Feb 2015, 23:15:49 UTC - in response to Message 1644708.  
Last modified: 20 Feb 2015, 23:17:04 UTC

You may also want to read this thread The GTX750(Ti) Thread

There is lots if tweaking info on the 780 cards there.
ID: 1644711 · Report as offensive
Profile petri33
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 02
Posts: 1668
Credit: 623,086,772
RAC: 156
Finland
Message 1644728 - Posted: 21 Feb 2015, 0:15:53 UTC - in response to Message 1644708.  

Thank you for your advices.
I quickly appended "app_config.xml" to run 2 tasks per GPU.

But why 2 or 3 tasks are recommended for the performance?
BOINC's default setting is 1 task per GPU.



One at at time works for all (If any).

Sending work, receiving answers, seding new .. They all have a wait time (latency). Both the CPU and GPU can do something valuable when waiting for the other.
To overcome Heisenbergs:
"You can't always get what you want / but if you try sometimes you just might find / you get what you need." -- Rolling Stones
ID: 1644728 · Report as offensive
Wedge009
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 451
Credit: 431,396,357
RAC: 553
Australia
Message 1644835 - Posted: 21 Feb 2015, 8:23:04 UTC

I'll remark that I have fairly good experience with both GF110 (GTX 570/580) and GK110 (GTX 780/Ti) and the latter will definitely perform better in S@h than the former (even GTX 780 vs GTX 580) by a reasonably good margin. It's just not easy to see this in terms of RAC, especially with task generation and validation being quite spotty over the past several months.
Soli Deo Gloria
ID: 1644835 · Report as offensive
yyama@home
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Apr 00
Posts: 9
Credit: 80,896,843
RAC: 61
Japan
Message 1644859 - Posted: 21 Feb 2015, 10:33:09 UTC

You may also want to read this thread The GTX750(Ti) Thread

There is lots if tweaking info on the 780 cards there.


I wrote "ap_cmdline_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_NV.txt" for AstroPulse as follows
referring to The GTX750(Ti) Thread and "v0.43a_ReadMe_AstroPulse_OpenCL_NV.txt".

GTX780Ti
-use_sleep -unroll 16 -oclFFT_plan 256 16 256 -ffa_block 16384 -ffa_block_fetch 8192 -tune 1 64 8 1 -tune 2 64 8 1 -hp

GTX580
-use_sleep -unroll 12 -oclFFT_plan 256 16 256 -ffa_block 12288 -ffa_block_fetch 6144 -tune 1 64 8 1 -tune 2 64 8 1 -hp

It's just not easy to see this in terms of RAC, especially with task generation and validation being quite spotty over the past several months.


I will wait for a long time. Thank you.
yyama@home
a member of the Team EDGE

"Murphy's law" is the one and only Truth of the universe.
ID: 1644859 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : GPU performance of GTX580 and GTX780Ti


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.