Whats the Best Platform to Crunch on?

Message boards : Number crunching : Whats the Best Platform to Crunch on?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22199
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 1642289 - Posted: 15 Feb 2015, 8:29:43 UTC

Having and AMD farm, I would say Intel I7, a pair (at least) of GTX980ti...

That should get the debate going....
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 1642289 · Report as offensive
Profile Zalster Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 May 99
Posts: 5517
Credit: 528,817,460
RAC: 242
United States
Message 1642349 - Posted: 15 Feb 2015, 12:56:51 UTC - in response to Message 1642289.  

To answer that question, I'll post my own.

How much are you willing to spend and what sort of RAC are you looking for?

Depending on your answer will get some of ours
ID: 1642349 · Report as offensive
Profile jason_gee
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Nov 06
Posts: 7489
Credit: 91,093,184
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1642470 - Posted: 15 Feb 2015, 17:45:40 UTC - in response to Message 1642289.  

Having and AMD farm, I would say Intel I7, a pair (at least) of GTX980ti...

That should get the debate going....


WUT, considering joining the darkside rob ?
"Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions.
ID: 1642470 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6534
Credit: 196,805,888
RAC: 57
United States
Message 1642524 - Posted: 15 Feb 2015, 20:17:10 UTC - in response to Message 1642248.  

I know the PS3's have been pretty much depreciated since the firm ware update. The Android Based Platform runs slow on mid range to low end devices, so with that in mind is the best plat form pretty much the Desktop CPU and GPU?

Is their any alternatives?

Best in which aspect?
-Best total output
-Best Performance Per Watt
-Best Performance Per Dollar/unit of currency
One option not many consider is the MoDT(Mobile on Desktop) setup. A desktop MB that takes a mobile/notebook CPU & gives the ability to add standard desktop GPUs.
Here are some examples of the current Socket G3 MBs from ASrock.
A similar, & cheaper to MoDT, way to go would be with an Intel Atom based system & adding GPUs.
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
ID: 1642524 · Report as offensive
spitfire_mk_2
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Apr 00
Posts: 563
Credit: 27,306,885
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1642526 - Posted: 15 Feb 2015, 20:24:52 UTC - in response to Message 1642470.  

Having and AMD farm, I would say Intel I7, a pair (at least) of GTX980ti...

That should get the debate going....


WUT, considering joining the darkside rob ?

We have cookies...
ID: 1642526 · Report as offensive
Profile Brent Norman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 99
Posts: 2786
Credit: 685,657,289
RAC: 835
Canada
Message 1642531 - Posted: 15 Feb 2015, 20:34:59 UTC - in response to Message 1642524.  

Hal, you forgot ... which setup gives the most reliable since results.

From what I see in my validating of other's inconclusive results ... NVidia cards suck at being reliable Scientifically. But you will bang up your credits.

Now that should start a debate!
ID: 1642531 · Report as offensive
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22199
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 1642543 - Posted: 15 Feb 2015, 20:55:06 UTC

Jason - the dark side?

I did consider it when plotting last year's upgrade of two of three crunchers. Cost deterred me.

I suppose for the ultimate I would be looking for something that would support a dozen (or more) GPU, costing less than a hundred bucks......

The majority of my credit comes from the GPUs, so money spent there is more effective than money spent of CPUs and mother boards, where, in comparison, the gains are "marginal".

The biggest problem I find with AMD boards is that finding one that will actually take 3 or more double width GPUs is rather hard...
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 1642543 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6534
Credit: 196,805,888
RAC: 57
United States
Message 1642689 - Posted: 16 Feb 2015, 2:46:34 UTC - in response to Message 1642531.  

Hal, you forgot ... which setup gives the most reliable since results.

From what I see in my validating of other's inconclusive results ... NVidia cards suck at being reliable Scientifically. But you will bang up your credits.

Now that should start a debate!

Measuring reliability is a tricky thing to do. If you simply compare a hosts valid & invalid results the top 20 hosts run ~1-2% invalid. Which isn't to bad on most scales of reliability. Also if they were very unreliable then they would not be producing so many valid results. Granted there are a number of hosts out there producing 100% garbage. Like due to the person running them not ever monitoring the machine.
There is the well known issue when a seemingly valid CPU result will get marked invalid against two GPU results. With the two GPU results are obviously trashed. However, That is more of an issue with limits the project, or BOINC, has on validating results. That can also happen with 3 CPU results, but is probably less likely due to the much more mature nature of CPU computing vs GPGPU computing.

Error rates and issues are a given for GPGPU computing that we can only accept for the time being.
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
ID: 1642689 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 1642691 - Posted: 16 Feb 2015, 2:51:51 UTC

I think, given the tens of thousands of WUs I process, my error rate is quite acceptable. All nVidia cards here.

If I see something running amock, I tend to it. Usually just a reboot fixes it quickly. Have had one or two rouge cards that needed to be taken out of service, but not many.
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 1642691 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Whats the Best Platform to Crunch on?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.