Big Bang

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Big Bang
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
KLiK
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 31 Mar 14
Posts: 1304
Credit: 22,994,597
RAC: 60
Croatia
Message 1615709 - Posted: 18 Dec 2014, 9:42:43 UTC - in response to Message 1615702.  

Think bigger, like a Multiverse, of course! There's another theory I do believe in. There are several Big Bangs and several Universes within a Multiverse but the question is, where does it stop? Is it infinite? Are there any borders? sigh, time to go to work... Nice post mp!

Now that we know that our Universe has Higgs field od 125GeV, and that it will be stable fo 10on100 years...

A question remains:
- Can we simulate the Universe with lower of higher Higgs field? And see when will the field collapse...
- Also, can the the "spot in background radiation" occur from the barriers of our Univers & another one "touching"?


non-profit org. Play4Life in Zagreb, Croatia, EU
ID: 1615709 · Report as offensive
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34053
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1615746 - Posted: 18 Dec 2014, 12:58:25 UTC - in response to Message 1615731.  

On a bigger timescale also energy will die

Doesn't the law of energy conservation say differently?


The law of conservation of energy states that the total energy of an isolated system cannot change. The big picture is not an isolated system imo Chris.
rOZZ
Music
Pictures
ID: 1615746 · Report as offensive
Darth Beaver Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 99
Posts: 6728
Credit: 21,443,075
RAC: 3
Australia
Message 1615779 - Posted: 18 Dec 2014, 14:38:48 UTC
Last modified: 18 Dec 2014, 14:40:23 UTC

Well i read your link Wiggo and i have many questions about it .

But basically i can't see how that theroy would work . Some one mentiond entrapy would be my first problem with this .

i don't and can't see how time could run backwards as that would mean gavity would also have to run backwards or repel atoms not bring them togeather , there are way to many problems with this theory .I also don't think you need to explain the arrow of time , for the multy verse or any verse to work the arrow of time must go forward otherwise you run into the big one .

cause and effect if time ran backward you would have effect then cause .

As it stands the big rip is pefect the universe returns back to pure energy and then the whole thing would start again i can't see any other way it could be different . I know i have said aything is possible in a multi verse but not time going backwards that would throw a spanner in the works .

As for proving there are other verses well i herd that sciencetists have found a gavity wave finally. With the spot on the background pictures of the universe and now the finding of a gavity wave the evedence is mounting that we do in fact live in a mutiverse.
ID: 1615779 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : Big Bang


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.