Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (93) Server Problems?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
arkayn Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 |
|
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
Again we have 3 AP splitters working on another file together, 01jl11ad this time. :-( Cheers. |
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 |
Well this is somewhat interesting. I was expecting that the huge surge in backlogged APs getting validated all of the sudden, RACs would explode 5-50x... but it seems to have not done that at all. Rather, at least from what I can see, it has gone back to roughly normal before the DB crashed in the first place. My host average--after being a flat line for 33 days--is now only down about 13% from what it was flat-lined at. Just not the result I was expecting. I would guess third-party calculations will show a huge spike, but the project doesn't seem to be doing the same. *shrug* Science is getting done though, and the credits don't matter in the grand scheme of things. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
BetelgeuseFive Send message Joined: 6 Jul 99 Posts: 158 Credit: 17,117,787 RAC: 19 |
I had over 600 validated Astropulse tasks and I would have expected my credit to be up by at least 200K. However, it didn't even come close to that. It looks like the total credit has not (yet ?) been incremented by the sum of the credit for the validated tasks. Has anyone else noticed something similar ? Tom |
BetelgeuseFive Send message Joined: 6 Jul 99 Posts: 158 Credit: 17,117,787 RAC: 19 |
Oops, maybe it was not that bad. I forgot that there were a lot of tasks that had already been validated, but not yet been purged. However, I still think the increase in credit should have been a little higher. Tom I had over 600 validated Astropulse tasks and I would have expected my credit to be up by at least 200K. However, it didn't even come close to that. It looks like the total credit has not (yet ?) been incremented by the sum of the credit for the validated tasks. Has anyone else noticed something similar ? |
Cruncher-American Send message Joined: 25 Mar 02 Posts: 1513 Credit: 370,893,186 RAC: 340 |
God Bless CreditNew: 9 Dec 2014, 5:06:05 UTC Completed and validated 5.34 1.05 490.39 AstroPulse v7 Anonymous platform (NVIDIA GPU) |
Julie Send message Joined: 28 Oct 09 Posts: 34053 Credit: 18,883,157 RAC: 18 |
|
Admiral Gloval Send message Joined: 31 Mar 13 Posts: 20243 Credit: 5,308,449 RAC: 0 |
I think my RAC got a swallow or two of "Red Bull". It is starting to fly up. |
JohnDK Send message Joined: 28 May 00 Posts: 1222 Credit: 451,243,443 RAC: 1,127 |
Nom, nom, nom, feeding frenzy. There's not much feeding frenzy going on, it's not easy getting APs and it's not because the demand is high. Looking at the cricket, the load isn't much higher compared with when there's was only MBs to download. |
Zalster Send message Joined: 27 May 99 Posts: 5517 Credit: 528,817,460 RAC: 242 |
Yeah, it's like 1 AP for every 30-40 MB coming out. Don't quote me on that number but looking at 300 download and only 17 were aps that is how it feels. Maybe it's just slow to get going? |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
Woohoo!! My RAC is climbing again! Just a quick question, will everything be alright with Bruno? Bruno has been or is going to be replace with a spare machine they acquired. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
cliff Send message Joined: 16 Dec 07 Posts: 625 Credit: 3,590,440 RAC: 0 |
@all, well the gremlins are back:-( 09/12/2014 23:15:54 | SETI@home | Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. 09/12/2014 23:15:54 | SETI@home | Reporting 2 completed tasks 09/12/2014 23:15:54 | SETI@home | Requesting new tasks for NVIDIA GPU 09/12/2014 23:16:16 | SETI@home | Scheduler request failed: Couldn't connect to server 09/12/2014 23:16:30 | | Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 09/12/2014 23:16:31 | | Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. 09/12/2014 23:17:45 | SETI@home | Computation for task 10oc14aa.15931.3748.438086664200.12.58_2 finished 09/12/2014 23:17:45 | SETI@home | Starting task 20no14aa.15664.20926.438086664199.12.103_0 09/12/2014 23:17:48 | SETI@home | Started upload of 10oc14aa.15931.3748.438086664200.12.58_2_0 09/12/2014 23:17:52 | SETI@home | Finished upload of 10oc14aa.15931.3748.438086664200.12.58_2_0 1st no tasks available, stats 5 hrs behind due to maint, now when apparently tasks ARE to hand, the bleeding server aint.. Bah humbug.. Regards, Cliff, Been there, Done that, Still no damm T shirt! |
Cruncher-American Send message Joined: 25 Mar 02 Posts: 1513 Credit: 370,893,186 RAC: 340 |
Back with a vengeance - dead for the last 6 hours, I make it. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
Yes, there certainly are several different error messages being throw back at me here. :-( Cheers. |
Dena Wiltsie Send message Joined: 19 Apr 01 Posts: 1628 Credit: 24,230,968 RAC: 26 |
If you try looking at your task list, you will find it takes a while to pull up. In addition, the creation rate is far to low for even normal operation. It looks like something is locking the data base and the software needs a good kick to clear it. |
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 |
[snip] I was seeing the same thing, then I remembered something that improved the odds back in the days before the co-lo: 2014-12-09 18:27:28 SETI@home Reporting 5 completed tasks, requesting new tasks So I got my tasks reported by going No New Tasks. After waiting 303 seconds, the scheduler responded normally. edit: of course, 45 minutes is the span from start to finish on the above log snippets, and a lot can change in 45 minutes server-side. So maybe what I did.. didn't even matter. *shrug* Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
[snip] I got my tasks reported 1st up, but now (even using that trick) just results in timeouts. :-( Cheers. |
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 |
Still haven't gotten handed any new tasks after 4 more requests, but all the requests are completing properly. Looking at the cricket, it sure doesn't seem things are back up and running smoothly after the maintenance this time around. Probably some DB query that is taking unusually long to run (purging many many many completed AP WUs, perhaps?). I did see just after the data driven webpages came back up that for MB, "received in last hour" was nearly 200k. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
Jimbocous Send message Joined: 1 Apr 13 Posts: 1853 Credit: 268,616,081 RAC: 1,349 |
It's dead Jim, it's dead... So it would seem, at least the SSP seems frozen, and trying to look at tasks takes you out into space. Later, Jim ... (lol) |
OTS Send message Joined: 6 Jan 08 Posts: 369 Credit: 20,533,537 RAC: 0 |
It's dead Jim, it's dead... It might be back. After several hours of Scheduler request failed: HTTP internal server error I am now seeing Message from server: Project has no tasks available Well, at least it is a start :) Edit: Wishful thinking I guess. After three AP downloads it is back to Scheduler request failed: HTTP internal server error Another case of never call a no hitter |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.